World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
56
Citations
14364
World Ranking
4027
National Ranking
1919

Mor Harchol-Balter publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mor Harchol-Balter sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 246 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mor Harchol-Balter D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mor Harchol-Balter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - ACM Fellow For contributions to performance modeling and analysis of distributed computing systems

Overview

Mor Harchol-Balter is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields including computer science, engineering, and business, management and accounting. The scientist has produced significant work in subfields such as management information systems, computer networks and communications, electrical and electronic engineering, information systems, and hardware and architecture.

The main topics of Mor Harchol-Balter's research include advanced queuing theory analysis, advanced wireless network optimization, cloud computing and resource management, optimization and search problems, parallel computing and optimization techniques, scheduling and optimization algorithms, and distributed and parallel computing systems.

Notable recent publications include:

  • Open problems in queueing theory inspired by datacenter computing, 2021, Queueing Systems
  • Optimal Scheduling in the Multiserver-job Model under Heavy Traffic, 2022, Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems
  • The Gittins Policy is Nearly Optimal in the M/G/k under Extremely General Conditions, 2020, Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems
  • The multiserver job queueing model, 2022, Queueing Systems
  • WCFS: a new framework for analyzing multiserver systems, 2022, Queueing Systems

Frequent co-authors in their research include Isaac Grosof, Alan Scheller-Wolf, Ziv Scully, Weina Wang, and Benjamin Wagner vom Berg.

Mor Harchol-Balter has published extensively in various venues, with a high number of contributions in ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, arXiv (Cornell University), Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems, Queueing Systems, and Performance Evaluation.

Among their book publications, Mor Harchol-Balter authored "Introduction to Probability for Computing," published by Cambridge University Press in 2023.

In recognition of their work, they received the ACM Fellow award in 2017 for contributions to performance modeling and analysis of distributed computing systems.

Best Publications

  • Performance Modeling and Design of Computer Systems: Queueing Theory in Action

    Mor Harchol-Balter

  • Optimal power allocation in server farms

    Anshul Gandhi;Mor Harchol-Balter;Rajarshi Das;Charles Lefurgy

  • Exploiting process lifetime distributions for dynamic load balancing

    Mor Harchol-Balter;Allen B. Downey

  • ATLAS: A scalable and high-performance scheduling algorithm for multiple memory controllers

    Yoongu Kim;Dongsu Han;Onur Mutlu;Mor Harchol-Balter

  • Thread Cluster Memory Scheduling: Exploiting Differences in Memory Access Behavior

    Yoongu Kim;Michael Papamichael;Onur Mutlu;Mor Harchol-Balter

  • Analysis of SRPT scheduling: investigating unfairness

    Nikhil Bansal;Mor Harchol-Balter

  • Size-based scheduling to improve web performance

    Mor Harchol-Balter;Bianca Schroeder;Nikhil Bansal;Mukesh Agrawal

  • On Choosing a Task Assignment Policy for a Distributed Server System

    Mor Harchol-Balter;Mark E. Crovella;Cristina D. Murta

  • AutoScale: Dynamic, Robust Capacity Management for Multi-Tier Data Centers

    Anshul Gandhi;Mor Harchol-Balter;Ram Raghunathan;Michael A. Kozuch

  • Open versus closed: a cautionary tale

    Bianca Schroeder;Adam Wierman;Mor Harchol-Balter

  • Connection Scheduling in Web Servers

    Mark E. Crovella;Robert Frangioso;Mor Harchol-Balter

  • Optimality analysis of energy-performance trade-off for server farm management

    Anshul Gandhi;Varun Gupta;Mor Harchol-Balter;Michael A. Kozuch

  • Task assignment with unknown duration.

    Mor Harchol-Balter

  • Resource discovery in distributed networks

    Mor Harchol-Balter;Tom Leighton;Daniel Lewin

  • Borg: the next generation

    Muhammad Tirmazi;Adam Barker;Nan Deng;E. Haque

  • Analysis of join-the-shortest-queue routing for web server farms

    Varun Gupta;Mor Harchol Balter;Karl Sigman;Ward Whitt

  • Exploiting process lifetime distributions for dynamic load balancing

    Mor Harchol-Balter;Allen B. Downey

  • Method and apparatus for assigning tasks in a distributed server system

    Mor Harchol-Balter;Mark E. Crovella

  • Web servers under overload: How scheduling can help

    Bianca Schroeder;Mor Harchol-Balter

  • Performance Modeling and Design of Computer Systems: Contents

    Unknown

  • Task assignment in a distributed system (extended abstract): improving performance by unbalancing load

    Mark E. Crovella;Mor Harchol-Balter;Cristina D. Murta

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan Scheller-Wolf
Alan Scheller-Wolf Carnegie Mellon University
Adam Wierman
Adam Wierman California Institute of Technology
Michael Kozuch
Michael Kozuch Intel (United States)
Mark Crovella
Mark Crovella Boston University
Nikhil Bansal
Nikhil Bansal University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jennifer Chayes
Jennifer Chayes University of California, Berkeley
Christian Borgs
Christian Borgs University of California, Berkeley
R. Srikant
R. Srikant University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Gregory R. Ganger
Gregory R. Ganger Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science opens doors to diverse online educational opportunities and dynamic career paths. Many students opt for online universities that are accredited, ensuring their degrees are recognized by employers and graduate schools. Accreditation provides confidence in the quality and integrity of your education.

For those passionate about interactive technology, a masters in game design online enables you to sharpen your creative and technical skills for roles in the booming gaming industry. Similarly, a cyber security bachelor degree online prepares students for in-demand careers protecting digital assets and critical infrastructure.

Computer science skills also transfer well into emerging fields. If you're interested in the intersection of technology and the built environment, an online construction management degree can pave the way for leadership roles in infrastructure and project development. Each of these pathways benefits from flexible online learning, allowing you to balance education with professional and personal commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Mor Harchol-Balter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles