World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
Switzerland
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 97 9094 125 458 50327

Michael J. Mihatsch publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael J. Mihatsch between 1972 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael J. Mihatsch published across 52 years, from 1972 to 2023, averaging 8.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 1978. 1 of the 465 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 1978. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 3 publications 1974: 2 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 30 publications 1979: 5 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 7 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 14 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 10 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 12 publications 1992: 11 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 14 publications 1995: 20 publications 1996: 17 publications 1997: 16 publications 1998: 20 publications 1999: 24 publications 2000: 16 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 24 publications 2003: 20 publications 2004: 30 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 3 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 4 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication
1972 2023

465 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael J. Mihatsch: publications per year, 1972 to 2023
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 3
1974 2
1975 1
1976 1
1977 0
1978 30
1979 5
1980 3
1981 4
1982 2
1983 7
1984 2
1985 3
1986 14
1987 6
1988 10
1989 7
1990 7
1991 12
1992 11
1993 12
1994 14
1995 20
1996 17
1997 16
1998 20
1999 24
2000 16
2001 16
2002 24
2003 20
2004 30
2005 6
2006 24
2007 11
2008 18
2009 10
2010 8
2011 7
2012 8
2013 3
2014 0
2015 0
2016 1
2017 3
2018 0
2019 0
2020 1
2021 4
2022 0
2023 1
Total 465
Download as CSV

Michael J. Mihatsch publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Mihatsch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 441–460 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 458 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771 458
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael J. Mihatsch D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Mihatsch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 96–97 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779 97
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Switzerland Leader Award

Overview

Michael J. Mihatsch was affiliated with the University Hospital of Basel in Switzerland. Their research primarily contributed to the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on several subfields including Molecular Biology, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Infectious Diseases, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

Their work covered various main topics related to biomedical research, including RNA Interference and Gene Delivery, DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry, advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques, COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies, COVID-19 diagnosis using artificial intelligence, and the broader healthcare impacts of COVID-19.

Recent papers authored by Michael J. Mihatsch include:

  • Safety, Tissue Distribution, and Metabolism of LNA-Containing Antisense Oligonucleotides in Rats, 2021, Toxicologic Pathology
  • Retrospective Post-mortem SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR of Autopsies with COVID-19-Suggestive Pathology Supports the Absence of Lethal Community Spread in Basel, Switzerland, before February 2020, 2020, Pathobiology
  • Multiorgan Crystal Deposition of an Amphoteric Drug in Rats Due to Lysosomal Accumulation and Conversion to a Poorly Soluble Hydrochloride Salt, 2020, Toxicological Sciences
  • Lamellar Inclusions within Hyperplastic Endoplasmic Reticulum in Benign Mesothelial Cells, 2020, Acta Cytologica

Their frequent co-authors consisted of:

  • Barbara Lenz
  • Andreas Brink
  • Bernd Steinhuber
  • F. Romero-Palomo
  • Matthias Festag

Michael J. Mihatsch's publications were distributed across various venues such as Toxicologic Pathology, Pathobiology, Toxicological Sciences, and Acta Cytologica, each representing a distinct aspect of biomedical and toxicological research.

Best Publications

  • Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor specimens

    J Kononen;L Bubendorf;A Kallioniemi;M Bärlund

  • The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology

    Lorraine C. Racusen;Kim Solez;Robert B. Colvin;Stephen M. Bonsib

  • Banff 07 Classification of Renal Allograft Pathology: Updates and Future Directions

    K. Solez;R. B. Colvin;L. C. Racusen;M. Haas

  • Metastatic patterns of prostate cancer: an autopsy study of 1,589 patients.

    Lukas Bubendorf;Alain Schöpfer;Urs Wagner;Guido Sauter

  • International standardization of criteria for the histologic diagnosis of renal allograft rejection : the Banff working classification of kidney transplant pathology

    K.i.m. Solez;Roy A. Axelsen;Hallgrimur Benediktsson;James F. Burdick

  • Prospective Study of Polyomavirus Type BK Replication and Nephropathy in Renal-Transplant Recipients

    Hans H Hirsch;Wendy Knowles;Michael Dickenmann;Jakob Passweg

  • Banff '05 Meeting Report: differential diagnosis of chronic allograft injury and elimination of chronic allograft nephropathy ('CAN').

    K. Solez;R. B. Colvin;L. C. Racusen;B. Sis

  • Antibody-mediated rejection criteria - an addition to the Banff 97 classification of renal allograft rejection.

    Lorraine C. Racusen;Robert B. Colvin;Kim Solez;Michael J. Mihatsch

  • Polyomavirus-Associated Nephropathy in Renal Transplantation: Interdisciplinary Analyses and Recommendations

    Hans H. Hirsch;Daniel C. Brennan;Cinthia B. Drachenberg;Fabrizio Ginevri

  • Survey of Gene Amplifications during Prostate Cancer Progression by High-Throughput Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization on Tissue Microarrays

    Lukas Bubendorf;Juha Kononen;Pasi Koivisto;Peter Schraml

  • Tissue microarrays for rapid linking of molecular changes to clinical endpoints.

    Joachim Torhorst;Christoph Bucher;Juha Kononen;Philippe Haas

  • Testing for polyomavirus type BK DNA in plasma to identify renal-allograft recipients with viral nephropathy.

    V Nickeleit;T Klimkait;I F Binet;P Dalquen

  • Tissue Microarrays for Gene Amplification Surveys in Many Different Tumor Types

    Peter Schraml;Juha Kononen;Lukas Bubendorf;Holger Moch

  • Polyomavirus Infection of Renal Allograft Recipients From Latent Infection to Manifest Disease

    Volker Nickeleit;Hans H. Hirsch;Isabelle F. Binet;Fred Gudat

  • Polyomavirus disease under new immunosuppressive drugs: a cause of renal graft dysfunction and graft loss.

    Isabelle Binet;Volker Nickeleit;Hans H. Hirsch;Olivier Prince

  • Sarcomatoid differentiation in renal cell carcinoma: A study of 101 cases

    Mariza De Peralta-Venturina;Holger Moch;Mitual Amin;Pheroze Tamboli

  • Hormone Therapy Failure in Human Prostate Cancer: Analysis by Complementary DNA and Tissue Microarrays

    Lukas Bubendorf;Meelis Kolmer;Meelis Kolmer;Juha Kononen;Pasi Koivisto

  • BK-virus nephropathy in renal transplants—tubular necrosis, MHC-class II expression and rejection in a puzzling game

    Volker Nickeleit;Hans H. Hirsch;Matthias Zeiler;Fred Gudat

  • Detection of the complement degradation product C4d in renal allografts: Diagnostic and therapeutic implications

    Volker Nickeleit;Matthias Zeiler;Fred Gudat;Gilbert Thiel

  • Factors associated with early remission of type I diabetes in children treated with cyclosporine.

    P.F. Bougneres;J.C. Carel;L. Castano;C. Boitard

Frequent Co-Authors

Holger Moch
Holger Moch University of Zurich
Guido Sauter
Guido Sauter Universität Hamburg
Lukas Bubendorf
Lukas Bubendorf University Hospital of Basel
Ronald Simon
Ronald Simon Universität Hamburg
Hans H. Hirsch
Hans H. Hirsch University Hospital of Basel
Philip F. Halloran
Philip F. Halloran University of Alberta
Olli Kallioniemi
Olli Kallioniemi Karolinska Institute
Lorraine C. Racusen
Lorraine C. Racusen Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Claudio Ponticelli
Claudio Ponticelli University of Milan
Michael Mengel
Michael Mengel University of Alberta

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The path to a medical career in the USA is broadening, with many students choosing related degrees and flexible online options to fast-track their goals. Nursing programs, in particular, are among the most popular alternatives, allowing you to enter the healthcare field more quickly or advance your current credentials.

For aspiring nurse practitioners, there are cheapest np school online options that enable working professionals to earn an advanced degree with affordable tuition. If you are starting your nursing education, consider the best cheapest bsn programs online to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing without a substantial financial burden.

Registered nurses aiming to take the next step can find cheap rn to bsn online programs designed to upskill quickly and flexibly. For those interested in academia or leadership, pursuing phd nursing education online can open doors to advanced research, teaching, and policy-making positions.

Exploring these online degree options can help streamline your journey into a rewarding healthcare career, offering education that fits your professional and personal life.

Best Scientists Citing Michael J. Mihatsch

Recently Published Articles