World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
55
Citations
9950
World Ranking
15146
National Ranking
6336

Marsha L. Frazier publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marsha L. Frazier sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 188 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Marsha L. Frazier D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marsha L. Frazier sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marsha L. Frazier was affiliated with The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in the United States during their professional career.

The available data does not include detailed information on the scientist's research papers, co-authors, main or subfields of study, or main topics of work. There is no record of specific publication venues or book publications associated with Marsha L. Frazier.

As the scientist is recorded as deceased, all references to their work appear in past tense, reflecting on their career and academic contributions without current active involvement.

No awards or honors linked to Marsha L. Frazier have been documented. Similarly, there is no detailed data about recent research outputs, allowing only a limited summary based on the affiliation information.

This overview is limited to verified factual data points and avoids any extrapolation beyond the known affiliation and status.

Best Publications

  • MicroRNAs in plasma of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients as novel blood-based biomarkers of disease

    Jin Wang;Jinyun Chen;Ping Chang;Aimee LeBlanc

  • MMAC1/PTEN mutations in primary tumor specimens and tumor cell lines.

    David H.F. Teng;Rong Hu;Huai Lin;Thaylon Davis

  • Increased Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression in Human Pancreatic Carcinomas and Cell Lines: Growth Inhibition by Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs

    Miguel A. Molina;Marta Sitja-Arnau;Michael G. Lemoine;Marsha L. Frazier

  • Microsatellite instability in the insulin–like growth factor II receptor gene in gastrointestinal tumours

    R. F. Souza;R. Appel;J. Yin;S. Wang

  • A Missense Mutation in KIT Kinase Domain 1 Correlates with Imatinib Resistance in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

    Lei L. Chen;Jonathan C. Trent;Elsie F. Wu;Gregory N. Fuller

  • Mammalian pancreatic preproglucagon contains three glucagon-related peptides.

    Linda C. Lopez;Marsha L. Frazier;Chung-Jey Su;Ashok Kumar

  • A genetic screen identifies an LKB1–MARK signalling axis controlling the Hippo–YAP pathway

    Morvarid Mohseni;Jianlong Sun;Allison Lau;Stephen Curtis

  • Phase II trial of imatinib mesylate in patients with metastatic melanoma

    K B Kim;O Eton;D W Davis;M L Frazier

  • Effects of Cyclin D1 Polymorphism on Age of Onset of Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer

    Shouming Kong;Christopher I. Amos;Rajyalakshmi Luthra;Patrick M. Lynch

  • Genotype–phenotype correlations in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome

    C. I. Amos;M. B. Keitheri-Cheteri;M. Sabripour;C. Wei

  • Reduced expression of cyclooxygenase 2 proteins in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancers relative to sporadic cancers.

    Frank A. Sinicrope;Michael Lemoine;Lixuan Xi;Patrick M. Lynch

  • Psychological impact of genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

    Ellen R. Gritz;Susan K. Peterson;Sally W. Vernon;Salma K. Marani

  • CXCL1 mediates obesity-associated adipose stromal cell trafficking and function in the tumour microenvironment

    Tao Zhang;Chieh Tseng;Yan Zhang;Olga Sirin

  • Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms of RecQ1, RAD54L, and ATM Genes Are Associated With Reduced Survival of Pancreatic Cancer

    Donghui Li;Marsha Frazier;Douglas B. Evans;Kenneth R. Hess

  • Cyclin D1 polymorphism and risk for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a case–control study

    Yuxin Zheng;Hongbing Shen;Erich M. Sturgis;Li E. Wang

  • Association of the CpG island methylator phenotype with family history of cancer in patients with colorectal cancer.

    Marsha L. Frazier;Lixuan Xi;Jihong Zong;Nancy Viscofsky

  • DNA Repair: a Double-Edged Sword

    Qingyi Wei;Marsha L. Frazier;Bernard Levin

  • Potato Carboxypeptidase Inhibitor, a T-knot Protein, Is an Epidermal Growth Factor Antagonist That Inhibits Tumor Cell Growth

    Carmen Blanco-Aparicio;Miguel Angel Molina;Ester Fernández-Salas;Marsha L. Frazier

  • Fine Mapping of a Genetic Locus for Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome on Chromosome 19p

    Christopher I. Amos;Deeksha Bali;Tracy J. Thiel;Joshua P. Anderson

  • Circulating microRNAs in Pancreatic Juice as Candidate Biomarkers of Pancreatic Cancer

    Jin Wang;Massimo Raimondo;Massimo Raimondo;Sushovan Guha;Jinyun Chen

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher I. Amos
Christopher I. Amos Baylor College of Medicine
Patrick M. Lynch
Patrick M. Lynch The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Douglas B. Evans
Douglas B. Evans Medical College of Wisconsin
James L. Abbruzzese
James L. Abbruzzese Duke University
Margaret R. Spitz
Margaret R. Spitz Baylor College of Medicine
Xifeng Wu
Xifeng Wu Zhejiang University
Victor G. Prieto
Victor G. Prieto The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Grady F. Saunders
Grady F. Saunders The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Qingyi Wei
Qingyi Wei Duke University
Asif Rashid
Asif Rashid The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to a wide range of degree programs and career pathways in the health sciences. Many students interested in life sciences also consider related fields like exercise science or nutrition. Pursuing an exercise science and nutrition degree online can complement a background in biology, providing opportunities in health coaching, sports science, or wellness consulting.

For those who prefer a specialized skillset, an online kinesiology bachelor's degree is ideal for careers focused on human movement, physical therapy, or rehabilitation. These programs build on foundational biological knowledge while preparing graduates for practical, in-demand professions.

There are also accelerated certificate options for students with advanced degrees looking to further their specialization. For example, the shortest pmhnp certificate program qualifies nurses for psychiatric care roles in less time, while the 12-month fnp program online allows experienced nurses to become family nurse practitioners quickly.

Whether you want to expand your scientific expertise or enter a new career in healthcare, these online programs offer flexible pathways tailored to your goals in the life sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Marsha L. Frazier

Recently Published Articles