World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
37
Citations
18156
World Ranking
2340
National Ranking
78

Markus Raffel publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Raffel sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 332 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Markus Raffel D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Raffel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Particle Image Velocimetry: A Practical Guide

    Unknown

  • Particle Image Velocimetry

    Unknown

  • Particle Image Velocimetry

    Unknown

  • Flow Diagnostics of Dynamic Stall on a Pitching Airfoil

    Unknown

  • Background-oriented schlieren (BOS) techniques

    Unknown

  • Principle and applications of the background oriented schlieren (BOS) method

    Unknown

  • The onset of dynamic stall revisited

    Unknown

  • On the applicability of background oriented optical tomography for large scale aerodynamic investigations

    Unknown

  • Dynamic Stall Control by Passive Disturbance Generators

    Unknown

  • Investigation of Three-Dimensional Dynamic Stall Using Computational Fluid Dynamics

    Agis Spentzos;George N. Barakos;Ken J. Badcock;Bryan E. Richards

  • Dynamic stall development

    Unknown

  • Experimental and numerical investigations of dynamic stall on a pitching airfoil

    Unknown

  • Application of particle image velocimetry to combusting flows: Design considerations and uncertainty assessment

    Unknown

  • Demonstration of the applicability of a Background Oriented Schlieren (BOS) method

    Unknown

  • Advanced evaluation algorithms for standard and dual plane particle image velocimetry.

    Olaf Ronneberger;M. Raffel;J. Kompenhans

  • Recent developments in background oriented Schlieren methods for rotor blade tip vortex measurements

    Unknown

  • Investigation of the unsteady flow velocity field above an airfoil pitching under deep dynamic stall conditions

    Unknown

  • Dynamic stall control by passive disturbance generators

    Unknown

  • Recording and evaluation methods of PIV investigations on a helicopter rotor model

    Unknown

  • Particle image velocimetry: a practical guide (experimental fluid mechanics)

    Markus Raffel;Christian E. Willert;Christian J. Kähler;Steve T. Wereley

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven T. Wereley
Steven T. Wereley Purdue University West Lafayette
Christian J. Kähler
Christian J. Kähler Bundeswehr University Munich
Fulvio Scarano
Fulvio Scarano Delft University of Technology
Olaf Ronneberger
Olaf Ronneberger University of Freiburg
Andreas Schröder
Andreas Schröder German Aerospace Center
Jerry Westerweel
Jerry Westerweel Delft University of Technology
George N. Barakos
George N. Barakos University of Glasgow
Ken Badcock
Ken Badcock University of Liverpool
Morteza Gharib
Morteza Gharib California Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering opens many doors, but students often explore related online degrees to broaden their expertise and job prospects. For those interested in speech and hearing sciences, it's useful to understand how challenging it can be to enter specialized programs. For example, if you're considering a shift toward healthcare fields, learning about how hard is it to get into slp grad school offers valuable insights into admission competitiveness and preparation strategies.

For individuals seeking less competitive options, researching the easiest audiology programs to get into can help identify accessible pathways without compromising quality education. These options expand career flexibility and provide alternative growth opportunities.

Cost is another significant factor for many students exploring online degrees. Understanding online speech pathology degree tuition and fees helps prospective learners budget effectively and compare different program offerings to find the best financial fit.

Additionally, veterans have unique educational benefits and support available. Those with military backgrounds may find tailored opportunities by reviewing speech pathology programs online for veterans, which highlight flexible, veteran-friendly studies that complement their skills and experiences.

Best Scientists Citing Markus Raffel

Recently Published Articles