World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
32
Citations
5130
World Ranking
3126
National Ranking
106

Richard M. Kelso publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Kelso sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 180 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Richard M. Kelso D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Kelso sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • An experimental study of round jets in cross-flow

    Unknown

  • Performance Variations of Leading-Edge Tubercles for Distinct Airfoil Profiles

    Kristy L. Hansen;Richard M. Kelso;Bassam B. Dally

  • Horseshoe vortex systems resulting from the interaction between a laminar boundary layer and a transverse jet

    R. M. Kelso;Alexander Smits

  • A critical review of temperature separation in a vortex tube

    Yunpeng Xue;Maziar Arjomandi;Richard Kelso

  • The formation mechanism and impact of streamwise vortices on NACA 0021 airfoil's performance with undulating leading edge modification

    N. Rostamzadeh;K. L. Hansen;R. M. Kelso;B. B. Dally

  • Evolution of the streamwise vortices generated between leading edge tubercles

    Kristy L. Hansen;Nikan Rostamzadeh;Richard M. Kelso;Bassam B. Dally

  • An insight into the dynamic stall lift characteristics

    Amanullah Choudhry;Ryan Leknys;Maziar Arjomandi;Richard Kelso

  • The effect of undulating leading-edge modifications on NACA 0021 airfoil characteristics

    N. Rostamzadeh;R. M. Kelso;B. B. Dally;K. L. Hansen

  • The working principle of a vortex tube

    Yunpeng Xue;Maziar Arjomandi;Richard Kelso

  • Effects of wind speed changes on wake instability of a wind turbine in a virtual wind tunnel using large eddy simulation

    Jang-Oh Mo;Amanullah Choudhry;Maziar Arjomandi;Richard Kelso

  • A study of long separation bubble on thick airfoils and its consequent effects

    Amanullah Choudhry;Maziar Arjomandi;Richard Kelso

  • Methods to control dynamic stall for wind turbine applications

    Amanullah Choudhry;Maziar Arjomandi;Richard Kelso

  • Experimental study of the flow structure in a counter flow Ranque–Hilsch vortex tube

    Yunpeng Xue;Maziar Arjomandi;Richard Kelso

  • Modelling of wind turbine wake using large eddy simulation

    Nima Sedaghatizadeh;Maziar Arjomandi;Richard Kelso;Benjamin Cazzolato

  • Experimental study of the thermal separation in a vortex tube

    Yunpeng Xue;Maziar Arjomandi;Richard Kelso

  • Tubercles and Their Applications

    Michael. D. Bolzon;Richard M. Kelso;Maziar Arjomandi

  • Reduction of flow induced airfoil tonal noise using leading edge sinusoidal modifications

    K. Hansen;R. Kelso;C. Doolan

  • Energy analysis within a vortex tube

    Yunpeng Xue;Maziar Arjomandi;Richard Kelso

  • Visualization of the flow structure in a vortex tube

    Yunpeng Xue;Maziar Arjomandi;Richard Kelso

  • The effects of temperature and hydrodynamics on the crystallization fouling under cross flow conditions

    Basim O. Hasan;Graham J. Nathan;Peter J. Ashman;Richard A. Craig

Frequent Co-Authors

Maziar Arjomandi
Maziar Arjomandi University of Adelaide
Graham J. Nathan
Graham J. Nathan University of Adelaide
Derek Abbott
Derek Abbott University of Adelaide
Bassam B. Dally
Bassam B. Dally King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Prashanthan Sanders
Prashanthan Sanders University of Adelaide
Con J. Doolan
Con J. Doolan University of New South Wales
Alexander Smits
Alexander Smits Princeton University
Mergen H. Ghayesh
Mergen H. Ghayesh University of Adelaide
Peter J. Ashman
Peter J. Ashman University of Adelaide
Simon C. Watkins
Simon C. Watkins University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities beyond Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. For example, degrees in Speech-Language Pathology (SLP) and audiology offer alternative paths in the healthcare and communication sectors. Prospective students should consider programs that fit their academic background and career goals.

Understanding admission criteria is crucial. Resources like slp grad school provide detailed insights on entry requirements and acceptance rates, helping applicants prepare effectively.

For those seeking less competitive options, reviewing the easiest audiology programs to get into can streamline the application process while securing quality education.

Cost is a key consideration for online degrees. The article on online speech pathology degree programs cost breaks down tuition fees, helping students budget for their education accurately.

Additionally, military members and veterans can benefit from specialized support. The guide on military friendly online speech pathology degree programs identifies programs designed to accommodate unique military needs.

Considering these factors can help engineering students diversify their skills and explore interdisciplinary careers in technology, healthcare, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Richard M. Kelso

Recently Published Articles