World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 35 2716 2547 199 181 208 4090

Mehmet Atlar publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mehmet Atlar between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mehmet Atlar published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2020. 5 of the 232 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2020. 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 4 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1985 2025

232 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mehmet Atlar: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 2
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 2
1996 0
1997 1
1998 3
1999 1
2000 2
2001 12
2002 5
2003 9
2004 5
2005 9
2006 7
2007 7
2008 1
2009 4
2010 2
2011 5
2012 4
2013 14
2014 3
2015 12
2016 14
2017 13
2018 15
2019 18
2020 21
2021 18
2022 8
2023 9
2024 3
2025 2
Total 232
Download as CSV

Mehmet Atlar publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mehmet Atlar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 207–216 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 208 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125 208
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Mehmet Atlar D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mehmet Atlar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158 35
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Mehmet Atlar is affiliated with the University of Strathclyde in the United Kingdom. Their research activity largely focuses on engineering and environmental science, with particular emphasis on ocean engineering and related disciplines.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Engineering
  • Environmental Science

Within these fields, Atlar has concentrated on several subfields of study such as:

  • Ocean Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Computational Mechanics
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Aerospace Engineering

Their research covers a range of key topics, including:

  • Cavitation Phenomena in Pumps
  • Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability
  • Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
  • Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry
  • Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
  • Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
  • Underwater Acoustics Research

Mehmet Atlar has contributed extensively to the literature in several publication venues, notably:

  • Ocean Engineering
  • Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
  • Applied Ocean Research
  • Ship Technology Research
  • Biofouling

Recent published papers illustrate the range of their work and include:

  • "Validation of the CFD approach for modelling roughness effect on ship resistance" (2020), Ocean Engineering
  • "Numerical investigation of marine propeller underwater radiated noise using acoustic analogy Part 2: The influence of eddy viscosity turbulence models" (2020), Ocean Engineering
  • "Prediction of the fouling penalty on the tidal turbine performance and development of its mitigation measures" (2020), Applied Energy
  • "Numerical prediction of cavitation erosion to investigate the effect of wake on marine propellers" (2021), Ocean Engineering
  • "Fouling effect on the resistance of different ship types" (2020), Ocean Engineering

Collaborations with other researchers play a substantial role in Atlar's work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Savaş Sezen
  • Batuhan Aktaş
  • Soonseok Song
  • Yiğit Kemal Demirel
  • Osman Turan

Best Publications

  • Turbulent drag reduction using compliant surfaces

    K.–S. Choi;X. Yang;B. R. Clayton;E. J. Glover

  • An investigation into the effect of biofouling on the ship hydrodynamic characteristics using CFD

    Soonseok Song;Yigit Kemal Demirel;Mehmet Atlar

  • The development of foul-release coatings for seagoing vessels

    Colin Anderson;Mehmet Atlar;Maureen Callow;Maxim Candries

  • Propeller cavitation noise investigations of a research vessel using medium size cavitation tunnel tests and full-scale trials

    Batuhan Aktas;Mehmet Atlar;Serkan Turkmen;Weichao Shi

  • Cavitation observations and noise measurements of horizontal axis tidal turbines with biomimetic blade leading-edge designs

    Weichao Shi;Mehmet Atlar;Roslynna Rosli;Batuhan Aktas

  • An experimental investigation of the effect of foul release coating application on performance, noise and cavitation characteristics of marine propellers

    Emin Korkut;Mehmet Atlar

  • An experimental investigation into the effect of vortex generators on the near-wake flow of a circular cylinder

    Uğur Oral Ünal;Mehmet Atlar

  • Numerical optimization and experimental validation for a tidal turbine blade with leading-edge tubercles

    Weichao Shi;Mehmet Atlar;Rosemary Norman;Batuhan Aktas

  • An experimental investigation on cavitation, noise, and slipstream characteristics of ocean stream turbines

    Unknown

  • An experimental study of motion behaviour with an intact and damaged Ro-Ro ship model

    Emin Korkut;Mehmet Atlar;Atilla Incecik

  • An improved mesh adaption and refinement approach to cavitation simulation (MARCS) of propellers

    Naz Yilmaz;Mehmet Atlar;Mahdi Khorasanchi

  • Hydrodynamic performance evaluation of a tidal turbine with leading-edge tubercles

    Weichao Shi;Roslynna Rosli;Mehmet Atlar;Rosemary Norman

  • Validation of the CFD approach for modelling roughness effect on ship resistance

    Soonseok Song;Yigit Kemal Demirel;Mehmet Atlar;Saishuai Dai

  • The measurement of the drag characteristics of tin-free self-polishing co-polymers and fouling release coatings using a rotor apparatus.

    Maxim Candries;Mehmet Atlar;Ehsan Mesbahi;Kayvan Pazouki

  • Numerical prediction of cavitation erosion to investigate the effect of wake on marine propellers

    Çağatay Sabri Köksal;Onur Usta;Batuhan Aktas;Mehmet Atlar

  • Experimental analysis of an air cavity concept applied on a ship hull to improve the hull resistance

    Jamie Butterworth;Mehmet Atlar;Weichao Shi

  • Numerical investigation of marine propeller underwater radiated noise using acoustic analogy part 2 : the influence of eddy viscosity turbulence models

    Savas Sezen;Taner Cosgun;Ahmet Yurtseven;Mehmet Atlar

  • Fouling effect on the resistance of different ship types

    Soonseok Song;Yigit Kemal Demirel;Claire De Marco Muscat-Fenech;Tahsin Tezdogan

  • Prediction of the fouling penalty on the tidal turbine performance and development of its mitigation measures

    Soonseok Song;Yigit Kemal Demirel;Mehmet Atlar;Weichao Shi

  • A numerical investigation into the influence of bio-inspired leading-edge tubercles on the hydrodynamic performance of a benchmark ducted propeller

    Callum Stark;Weichao Shi;Mehmet Atlar

  • Effect of turbulence modelling on the computation of the near-wake flow of a circular cylinder

    Ug˘ur Oral Ünal;Mehmet Atlar;Ömer Gören

  • Prediction of cavitating propeller underwater radiated noise using RANS & DES-based hybrid method

    Savas Sezen;Mehmet Atlar;Patrick Fitzsimmons

  • Large-amplitude motion responses of a Ro-Ro ship to regular oblique waves in intact and damaged conditions

    Hoi-Sang Chan;Mehmet Atlar;Atilla Incecik

Frequent Co-Authors

Atilla Incecik
Atilla Incecik University of Strathclyde
Anthony Paul Roskilly
Anthony Paul Roskilly Durham University
Anthony S. Clare
Anthony S. Clare Newcastle University
Kwing-So Choi
Kwing-So Choi University of Nottingham
Luca Oneto
Luca Oneto University of Genoa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering opens doors to various specialized fields, but students often consider complementary online degrees to broaden career options. For example, those interested in healthcare technology might explore slp grad school, which provides insights into requirements and acceptance rates for speech-language pathology programs.

Since location can influence access to programs, researching speech-language pathology graduate programs by state can help prospective students identify the best fit geographically and academically. This approach ensures candidates find programs that align with their goals and state licensure requirements.

Cost remains a significant factor in choosing an online degree. Understanding the online speech pathology school cost provides clarity on tuition, fees, and potential financial aid, helping students budget effectively while pursuing advanced studies.

Veterans looking to transition into new careers will find tailored opportunities through speech pathology programs online for veterans, which highlight veteran-specific support and benefits. Such programs can provide a smoother educational pathway by leveraging military experience and resources.

Best Scientists Citing Mehmet Atlar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles