World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
101
Citations
43416
World Ranking
7890
National Ranking
304

Neuroscience

D-Index
101
Citations
43198
World Ranking
727
National Ranking
18

Mark A. van Buchem publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. van Buchem sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 465 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Mark A. van Buchem D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. van Buchem sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark A. van Buchem is affiliated with Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands and has a research focus primarily in medicine, with a strong emphasis on neurology. Their academic contributions span multiple subfields, including neurology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, physiology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and psychiatry and mental health.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of areas, notably:

  • Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management

Mark A. van Buchem's notable recent papers include the following:

  • "The Boston criteria version 2.0 for cerebral amyloid angiopathy: a multicentre, retrospective, MRI-neuropathology diagnostic accuracy study," 2022, The Lancet Neurology
  • "Prevalence Estimates of Amyloid Abnormality Across the Alzheimer Disease Clinical Spectrum," 2022, JAMA Neurology
  • "Cerebral small vessel disease genomics and its implications across the lifespan," 2020, Nature Communications
  • "Progression of cerebral amyloid angiopathy: a pathophysiological framework," 2023, The Lancet Neurology
  • "Ultra-long-TE arterial spin labeling reveals rapid and brain-wide blood-to-CSF water transport in humans," 2021, NeuroImage

Their collaborative work frequently includes coauthors such as Matthias J.P. van Osch, Jeroen de Bresser, Sigurður Sigurðsson, Marieke J.H. Wermer, and Lenore J. Launer, with numerous joint publications reflecting ongoing partnerships in related research areas.

Published works often appear in venues including:

  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • Stroke
  • NeuroImage Clinical
  • The Lancet Neurology
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia

Best Publications

  • Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration

    Joanna M. Wardlaw;Eric E. Smith;Geert J Biessels;Charlotte Cordonnier

  • Cerebral microbleeds: a guide to detection and interpretation

    Steven M. Greenberg;Meike W. Vernooij;Charlotte Cordonnier;Anand Viswanathan

  • Prevalence of cerebral amyloid pathology in persons without dementia: a meta-analysis.

    Willemijn J. Jansen;Rik Ossenkoppele;Dirk L. Knol;Betty M. Tijms

  • Migraine as a Risk Factor for Subclinical Brain Lesions

    Mark C. Kruit;Mark A. van Buchem;Paul A. M. Hofman;Jacobus T. N. Bakkers

  • Arterial stiffness, pressure and flow pulsatility and brain structure and function: the Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility – Reykjavik Study

    Gary F. Mitchell;Mark A. van Buchem;Sigurdur Sigurdsson;John D. Gotal

  • Whole brain resting-state analysis reveals decreased functional connectivity in major depression

    Ilya M. Veer;Ilya M. Veer;Christian F. Beckmann;Christian F. Beckmann;Marie-Jose van Tol;Marie-Jose van Tol;Luca Ferrarini

  • Vascular dysfunction-The disregarded partner of Alzheimer's disease

    Melanie D. Sweeney;Axel Montagne;Abhay P. Sagare;Daniel A. Nation

  • Blood-Brain Barrier Leakage in Patients with Early Alzheimer Disease

    Harm J. van de Haar;Saartje Burgmans;Jacobus F. A. Jansen;Matthias J. P. van Osch

  • Infarcts in the Posterior Circulation Territory in Migraine. The Population-Based MRI CAMERA Study

    Mark C. Kruit;Lenore J. Launer;Michel D. Ferrari;Mark A. van Buchem

  • Migraine is associated with an increased risk of deep white matter lesions, subclinical posterior circulation infarcts and brain iron accumulation: the population‐based MRI CAMERA study

    MC Kruit;MA van Buchem;LJ Launer;GM Terwindt

  • Reduced Medial Prefrontal Cortex Volume in Adults Reporting Childhood Emotional Maltreatment

    Anne-Laura van Harmelen;Marie-José van Tol;Nic J.A. van der Wee;Dick J. Veltman

  • Regional brain volume in depression and anxiety disorders.

    Marie-Jose van Tol;Nic J. A. van der Wee;Odile A. van den Heuvel;Marjan M. A. Nielen

  • Chronic sinusitis in severe asthma is related to sputum eosinophilia.

    Anneke ten Brinke;Diana C. Grootendorst;Judith Th. Schmidt;Francisca T. de Bruïne

  • Assessment of middle cerebral artery diameter during hypocapnia and hypercapnia in humans using ultra-high-field MRI

    Jasper Verbree;Anne-Sophie G. T. Bronzwaer;Eidrees Ghariq;Maarten J. Versluis

  • Prevalence Estimates of Amyloid Abnormality Across the Alzheimer Disease Clinical Spectrum.

    Unknown

  • Cerebral blood flow in small vessel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Yulu Shi;Michael J Thrippleton;Stephen D Makin;Ian Marshall

  • Attack frequency and disease duration as indicators for brain damage in migraine.

    Nicole Schmitz;Faiza Admiraal-Behloul;Enrico B. Arkink;Mark C. Kruit

  • Enhanced amygdala reactivity to emotional faces in adults reporting childhood emotional maltreatment

    Anne-Laura van Harmelen;Marie-José van Tol;Liliana R. Demenescu;Nic J. A. van der Wee

  • Beyond acute social stress: increased functional connectivity between amygdala and cortical midline structures.

    Ilya M. Veer;Nicole Y.L. Oei;Philip Spinhoven;Mark A. van Buchem

  • Common variants at 12q14 and 12q24 are associated with hippocampal volume

    Joshua C Bis;Charles DeCarli;Albert Vernon Smith;Fedde van der Lijn

  • Quantitative volumetric magnetization transfer analysis in multiple sclerosis: estimation of macroscopic and microscopic disease burden.

    M A van Buchem;J C McGowan;D L Kolson;M Polansky

  • Blood-Brain Barrier Leakage in Patients with Early Alzheimer Disease (vol 281, pg 527, 2016)

    Harm J van de Haar;Saartje Burgmans;Jacobus F A Jansen;Matthias J P van Osch

Frequent Co-Authors

Lenore J. Launer
Lenore J. Launer National Institutes of Health
Vilmundur Gudnason
Vilmundur Gudnason University of Iceland
Anton J. M. de Craen
Anton J. M. de Craen Leiden University Medical Center
Rudi G. J. Westendorp
Rudi G. J. Westendorp University of Copenhagen
Michel D. Ferrari
Michel D. Ferrari Leiden University Medical Center
Huub A. M. Middelkoop
Huub A. M. Middelkoop Leiden University
Tom W. J. Huizinga
Tom W. J. Huizinga Leiden University Medical Center
Steven M. Greenberg
Steven M. Greenberg Harvard University
Wiesje M. van der Flier
Wiesje M. van der Flier Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Serge A.R.B. Rombouts
Serge A.R.B. Rombouts Leiden University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Neuroscience opens doors to a wide range of academic and professional opportunities. Many students are now opting for flexible learning options, and an accelerated bachelor's degree online can help you earn your credentials faster, allowing you to step into the workforce sooner.

When considering your future, earning potential is a key factor for many students. Some of the highest paying bachelor degrees entry-level include fields related to health and science, making Neuroscience an attractive choice for those aiming for financial security.

In fact, Neuroscience is often listed among the most lucrative majors due to its applications in research, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, and technology. This broad applicability translates to diverse career pathways after graduation.

If cost is a concern, there are many online college courses with financial aid available, ensuring that pursuing advanced study in Neuroscience is accessible and affordable.

Best Scientists Citing Mark A. van Buchem

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles