World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
M. Zachary Rosenthal

M. Zachary Rosenthal

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
8211
World Ranking
7824
National Ranking
4205

M. Zachary Rosenthal publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Zachary Rosenthal sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 85 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

M. Zachary Rosenthal D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Zachary Rosenthal sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

M. Zachary Rosenthal is affiliated with Duke University in the United States and has contributed extensively to research primarily in the fields of neuroscience and psychology. Their work focuses notably on areas related to hearing, sensory systems, and clinical psychology, with a significant emphasis on misophonia and related mental health topics.

Their recent publications demonstrate a focus on misophonia and its psychological characteristics. Among these are the following papers:

  • Development and Initial Validation of the Duke Misophonia Questionnaire, 2021, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Consensus Definition of Misophonia: A Delphi Study, 2022, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • The Mediating Role of Emotion Regulation Within the Relationship Between Neuroticism and Misophonia: A Preliminary Investigation, 2020, Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Examining emotional functioning in misophonia: The role of affective instability and difficulties with emotion regulation, 2022, PLoS ONE
  • Psychiatric and audiologic features of misophonia: Use of a clinical control group with auditory over-responsivity, 2022, Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Rosenthal has collaborated frequently with a group of co-authors known for their contributions in related research areas. Frequent coauthors include Rachel E. Guetta, Clair Cassiello-Robbins, Jacqueline Trumbull, Deepika Anand, and Lisalynn Kelley.

The scientist has published across several prominent venues, demonstrating a breadth of dissemination in relevant scientific communities. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • PLoS ONE
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

M. Zachary Rosenthal's body of work spans key subfields such as cognitive neuroscience, sensory systems, speech and hearing, clinical psychology, and experimental and cognitive psychology. Their research topics cover:

  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Noise Effects and Management
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Multisensory perception and integration

In addition to research articles, Rosenthal has contributed to book publications, including "Advances in Understanding the Nature and Features of Misophonia," published by Frontiers Media in 2023.

Best Publications

  • Mechanisms of change in dialectical behavior therapy: theoretical and empirical observations.

    Thomas R. Lynch;Alexander L. Chapman;M. Zachary Rosenthal;Janice R. Kuo

  • An experimental investigation of emotion dysregulation in borderline personality disorder.

    Kim L. Gratz;M. Zachary Rosenthal;Matthew T. Tull;C. W. Lejuez

  • Heightened sensitivity to facial expressions of emotion in borderline personality disorder.

    Thomas R. Lynch;M. Zachary Rosenthal;David S. Kosson;Jennifer S. Cheavens

  • Borderline personality disorder and emotional responding: a review of the research literature.

    M. Zachary Rosenthal;Kim L. Gratz;David S. Kosson;Jennifer S. Cheavens

  • Interpersonal functioning in borderline personality disorder: a systematic review of behavioral and laboratory-based assessments.

    Sophie A. Lazarus;Jennifer S. Cheavens;Francesca Festa;M. Zachary Rosenthal

  • Impulsivity as a Common Process Across Borderline Personality and Substance Use Disorders

    Marina A. Bornovalova;C. W. Lejuez;Stacey Brooke Daughters;M. Zachary Rosenthal

  • Decision-making and risk aversion among depressive adults

    Moria J. Smoski;Thomas R. Lynch;M. Zachary Rosenthal;Jennifer S. Cheavens

  • Prefrontal mechanisms for executive control over emotional distraction are altered in major depression.

    Lihong Wang;Kevin S. LaBar;Moria Smoski;M. Zachary Rosenthal

  • Thought suppression mediates the relationship between negative affect and borderline personality disorder symptoms

    M. Zachary Rosenthal;Jennifer S. Cheavens;Carl W. Lejuez;Thomas R. Lynch

  • An analogue investigation of the relationships among perceived parental criticism, negative affect, and borderline personality disorder features: the role of thought suppression

    Jennifer S. Cheavens;M. Zachary Rosenthal;Stacey B. Daughters;Jennifer Nowak

  • An experimental investigation of emotional reactivity and delayed emotional recovery in borderline personality disorder: the role of shame.

    Kim L. Gratz;M. Zachary Rosenthal;Matthew T. Tull;C.W. Lejuez

  • Virtual reality for persistent pain: a new direction for behavioral pain management.

    Francis J. Keefe;Dane A. Huling;Michael J. Coggins;Daniel F. Keefe

  • Effects of virtual environment platforms on emotional responses

    Kwanguk Kim;M. Zachary Rosenthal;David J. Zielinski;Rachael Brady

  • Chronic Avoidance Helps Explain the Relationship Between Severity of Childhood Sexual Abuse and Psychological Distress in Adulthood

    M. Zachary Rosenthal;Mandra L. Rasmussen Hall;Kathleen M. Palm;Sonja V. Batten

  • Emotional learning during dissociative states in borderline personality disorder

    Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer;Jana Mauchnik;Nikolaus Kleindienst;Christian Schmahl

  • Non-suicidal self-injury with and without borderline personality disorder: differences in self-injury and diagnostic comorbidity.

    Brianna J. Turner;Brianna J. Turner;Katherine L. Dixon-Gordon;Sara B. Austin;Marcus A. Rodriguez

  • A model predicting suicidal ideation and hopelessness in depressed older adults: The impact of emotion inhibition and affect intensity

    Thomas R. Lynch;J.S. Cheavens;J.Q. Morse;M.Z. Rosenthal

  • Suicidal Behavior and Problems with Emotion Regulation.

    Andrada D. Neacsiu;Caitlin M. Fang;Marcus Rodriguez;M. Zachary Rosenthal

  • Distress and affective dysregulation in patients with borderline personality disorder: a psychophysiological ambulatory monitoring study

    Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer;Janice Kuo;Wolff Schlotz;Nikolaus Kleindienst

  • A Virtual Joy-Stick Study of Emotional Responses and Social Motivation in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

    Kwang Uk Kim;Kwang Uk Kim;M. Zachary Rosenthal;Mary Gwaltney;William Jarrold

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas R. Lynch
Thomas R. Lynch University of Southampton
Jennifer S. Cheavens
Jennifer S. Cheavens The Ohio State University
Alexander L. Chapman
Alexander L. Chapman Simon Fraser University
Carl W. Lejuez
Carl W. Lejuez Stony Brook University
David S. Kosson
David S. Kosson Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science
Katherine L. Dixon-Gordon
Katherine L. Dixon-Gordon University of Massachusetts Amherst
Kim L. Gratz
Kim L. Gratz University of Toledo
Moria J. Smoski
Moria J. Smoski Duke University
Clive J. Robins
Clive J. Robins Duke University
John G. Gunderson
John G. Gunderson Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degree options and career pathways, especially in fields like social work. Each state has unique education and licensure requirements for aspiring social workers, making it important to research your target location early on.

For example, if you're interested in working as a social worker in Connecticut, you may want to review the social worker education requirements in Connecticut. Similarly, requirements can differ in other states, such as exploring Delaware education requirements for social workers, social worker degree requirements in Florida, or social worker degree requirements in Georgia.

Many accredited universities now offer online psychology and social work programs, making it easier for students to meet state-specific regulations from anywhere in the country. These pathways can lead to roles in mental health services, counseling, school psychology, and beyond. Understanding each state's specific framework is key as you plan your educational and professional journey.

Best Scientists Citing M. Zachary Rosenthal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles