World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
49
Citations
6957
World Ranking
5362
National Ranking
135

Lukas Emmenegger publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lukas Emmenegger sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 355 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Lukas Emmenegger D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lukas Emmenegger sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Mechanisms of N2O production in biological wastewater treatment under nitrifying and denitrifying conditions.

    Pascal Wunderlin;Joachim Mohn;Adriano Joss;Lukas Emmenegger

  • Determination of biogenic and fossil CO2 emitted by waste incineration based on 14CO2 and mass balances

    J Mohn;Sönke Szidat;J Fellner;H Rechberger

  • Oxidation Kinetics of Fe(II) in a Eutrophic Swiss Lake

    Lukas Emmenegger;D. Whitney King;Laura Sigg;Barbara Sulzberger

  • Light-induced redox cycling of iron in circumneutral lakes

    Lukas Emmenegger;René Schönenberger;Laura Sigg;Barbara Sulzberger

  • Ammonia monitoring at trace level using photoacoustic spectroscopy in industrial and environmental applications

    Stéphane Schilt;Luc Thévenaz;Marc Niklès;Lukas Emmenegger

  • Isotope Signatures of N2O in a Mixed Microbial Population System: Constraints on N2O Producing Pathways in Wastewater Treatment

    Pascal Wunderlin;Moritz F. Lehmann;Hansruedi Siegrist;Béla Tuzson

  • COVID-19 lockdowns highlight a risk of increasing ozone pollution in European urban areas

    Stuart K. Grange;Stuart K. Grange;James D. Lee;Will S. Drysdale;Alastair C. Lewis

  • Validation of the Swiss methane emission inventory by atmospheric observations and inverse modelling

    Stephan Henne;Dominik Brunner;Brian Oney;Markus Leuenberger

  • In-situ observations of the isotopic composition of methane at the Cabauw tall tower site

    Thomas Röckmann;Simon Eyer;Carina van der Veen;Maria-Elena Popa

  • New method for isotopic ratio measurements of atmospheric carbon dioxide using a 4.3 μm pulsed quantum cascade laser

    D.D. Nelson;J.B. McManus;S.C. Herndon;M.S. Zahniser

  • Secondary Effects of Catalytic Diesel Particulate Filters: Conversion of PAHs versus Formation of Nitro-PAHs

    Norbert V. Heeb;Peter Schmid;Martin Kohler;Erika Gujer

  • Site-specific 15N isotopic signatures of abiotically produced N2O

    Jannis Heil;Jannis Heil;Benjamin Wolf;Nicolas Brüggemann;Lukas Emmenegger

  • High precision and continuous field measurements of δ 13 C and δ 18 O in carbon dioxide with a cryogen-free QCLAS

    B. Tuzson;J. Mohn;M.J. Zeeman;R.A. Werner

  • Compact multipass optical cell for laser spectroscopy

    Unknown

  • Methodical study of nitrous oxide eddy covariance measurements using quantum cascade laser spectrometery over a Swiss forest

    Werner Eugster;K. Zeyer;M. Zeeman;Pavel Michna

  • COVID-19 lockdowns highlight a risk of increasing ozone pollution in European urban areas

    Unknown

  • N2O exchange over managed grassland: application of a quantum cascade laser spectrometer for micrometeorological flux measurements.

    Albrecht Neftel;Christof Ammann;Cornelia Fischer;Christoph Spirig

  • Quantum cascade laser based spectrometer for in situ stable carbon dioxide isotope measurements

    B. Tuzson;M.J. Zeeman;M.S. Zahniser;L. Emmenegger

  • Continuous isotopic composition measurements of tropospheric CO 2 at Jungfraujoch (3580 m a.s.l.), Switzerland: real-time observation of regional pollution events

    B. Tuzson;S. Henne;D. Brunner;M. Steinbacher

  • Experimental assessment of N2O background fluxes in grassland systems

    Albrecht Neftel;Chris Flechard;Christof Ammann;Franz Conen

Frequent Co-Authors

Jérôme Faist
Jérôme Faist ETH Zurich
Dominik Brunner
Dominik Brunner Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology
Stephan Henne
Stephan Henne Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology
Martin Steinbacher
Martin Steinbacher Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology
Brigitte Buchmann
Brigitte Buchmann Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology
Martin K. Vollmer
Martin K. Vollmer Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology
Stefan Reimann
Stefan Reimann Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology
Mattias Beck
Mattias Beck ETH Zurich
Peter Schmid
Peter Schmid University of Zurich
Werner Eugster
Werner Eugster ETH Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, diversifying your education can open many doors. Online degree programs provide flexible options to complement your primary studies and advance your career. For example, educators looking to impact environmental policy or sustainability education might explore online edd programs no dissertation. These programs offer advanced leadership training without the intense research requirement.

If you’re seeking reputable qualifications, consider enrolling in accredited eds to edd programs. Such accreditation ensures quality education that is recognized across various academic and professional fields, benefiting career progression within environmental consulting or government agencies.

For professionals aiming to blend social work with environmental advocacy, pursuing a dsw program can enhance your expertise in community-focused environmental health and resilience initiatives.

Alternatively, earning an online general studies bachelor degree cheap serves as an accessible foundation for those new to higher education. This flexible degree can be tailored to include environmental topics, providing a broad platform for future specialization.

Best Scientists Citing Lukas Emmenegger

Recently Published Articles