World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
41
Citations
6458
World Ranking
7878
National Ranking
3386

Luc Jasmin publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luc Jasmin sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 70 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Luc Jasmin D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luc Jasmin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Luc Jasmin is a researcher affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their academic work spans multiple areas within neuroscience and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, focusing on mechanisms related to brain disorders and biochemical processes.

The research topics covered by Luc Jasmin include:

  • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Stress responses and cortisol
  • Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Biochemical acid research studies
  • Computational drug discovery methods
  • Protein structure and dynamics
  • Gut microbiota and health

Main fields of study for Luc Jasmin are:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Their subfields of study indicate a focus on psychiatric and molecular aspects, including:

  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Molecular Biology
  • Biochemistry
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems

Luc Jasmin has published multiple papers that address various biochemical and neurological topics. Recent publications include:

  • "Agomelatine effects on fat-enriched diet induced neuroinflammation and depression-like behavior in rats" (2021), published in Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
  • "Identification of potent inhibitors of kynurenine-3-monooxygenase from natural products: In silico and in vitro approaches" (2024), published in Heliyon
  • "Identification of Two Flavonoids as New and Safe Inhibitors of Kynurenine Aminotransferase II via Computational and In Vitro Study" (2025), published in Pharmaceuticals
  • "Identification of Two Flavonoids as New and Safe Inhibitors of Kynurenine Aminotransferase II via Computational and In Vitro Study" (2024), published in Preprints.org
  • "Cell-specific and targeted delivery of RNA moieties" (2020), published in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequent venues for Luc Jasmin's publications include:

  • Pharmaceuticals
  • Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
  • Heliyon
  • Preprints.org
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Throughout their career, Luc Jasmin has collaborated regularly with several researchers, with frequent co-authors being:

  • Redouane Rebai
  • Abdennacer Boudah
  • Mohammed Esseddik Toumi
  • Imene Derardja
  • Miguel Carmena-Bargueño

Best Publications

  • Analgesia and hyperalgesia from GABA-mediated modulation of the cerebral cortex.

    Luc Jasmin;Samuel D. Rabkin;Alberto Granato;Abdennacer Boudah

  • Synaptic relationship between substance P and the substance P receptor: light and electron microscopic characterization of the mismatch between neuropeptides and their receptors.

    Hantao Liu;Jessica L. Brown;Luc Jasmin;John E. Maggio

  • Transneuronal Labeling of a Nociceptive Pathway, the Spino-(Trigemino-)Parabrachio-Amygdaloid, in the Rat

    L Jasmin;A R Burkey;J P Card;A I Basbaum

  • Rostral agranular insular cortex and pain areas of the central nervous system: a tract-tracing study in the rat.

    Luc Jasmin;Alberto Granato;Peter T. Ohara

  • The cold plate as a test of nociceptive behaviors: description and application to the study of chronic neuropathic and inflammatory pain models

    Luc Jasmin;Lynn Kohan;Michelle Franssen;Gabriella Janni

  • Gliopathic Pain: When Satellite Glial Cells Go Bad

    Peter T. Ohara;Jean Philippe Vit;Aditi Bhargava;Marcela Romero

  • Partial ablations of the flocculus and ventral paraflocculus in monkeys cause linked deficits in smooth pursuit eye movements and adaptive modification of the VOR.

    H. Rambold;A. K. Churchland;Y. Selig;L. Jasmin

  • Can satellite glial cells be therapeutic targets for pain control

    Luc Jasmin;Jean-Philippe Vit;Aditi Bhargava;Peter T. Ohara

  • Reorganization of the spinal dorsal horn in models of chronic pain: correlation with behaviour.

    J.R Goff;A.R Burkey;D.J Goff;L Jasmin

  • Evidence for a role of connexin 43 in trigeminal pain using RNA interference in vivo

    Peter Terence Ohara;Jean-Philippe Vit;Aditi Bhargava;Luc Jasmin

  • Silencing the Kir4.1 Potassium Channel Subunit in Satellite Glial Cells of the Rat Trigeminal Ganglion Results in Pain-Like Behavior in the Absence of Nerve Injury

    Jean-Philippe Vit;Peter T. Ohara;Aditi Bhargava;Kanwar Kelley

  • Dopamine reuptake inhibition in the rostral agranular insular cortex produces antinociception

    Adam R. Burkey;Earl Carstens;Luc Jasmin

  • Walking evokes a distinctive pattern of Fos-like immunoreactivity in the caudal brainstem and spinal cord of the rat.

    L. Jasmin;K.R. Gogas;S.C. Ahlgren;J.D. Levine

  • Satellite glial cells in the trigeminal ganglion as a determinant of orofacial neuropathic pain

    Jean-Philippe Vit;Luc Jasmin;Aditi Bhargava;Peter T. Ohara

  • An Opioidergic Cortical Antinociception Triggering Site in the Agranular Insular Cortex of the Rat that Contributes to Morphine Antinociception

    Adam R. Burkey;Earl Carstens;Julia J. Wenniger;Jinwen Tang

  • Cortical modulation of pain.

    P. T. Ohara;J. P. Vit;L. Jasmin

  • Satellite glial cell proliferation in the trigeminal ganglia after chronic constriction injury of the infraorbital nerve.

    Macayla Donegan;Melanie Kernisant;Criselda Cua;Luc Jasmin

  • GABA puts a stop to pain

    L Jasmin;M V Wu;P T Ohara

  • Differential effects of morphine on noxious stimulus-evoked fos-like immunoreactivity in subpopulations of spinoparabrachial neurons

    L Jasmin;H Wang;K Tarczy-Hornoch;JD Levine

  • Evidence for glutamate as a neuroglial transmitter within sensory ganglia.

    Ling-Hsuan Kung;Kerui Gong;Mary Adedoyin;Johnson Ng

  • Temporomandibular joint inflammation activates glial and immune cells in both the trigeminal ganglia and in the spinal trigeminal nucleus

    Giovanni Villa;Stefania Ceruti;Matteo Zanardelli;Giulia Magni

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter T. Ohara
Peter T. Ohara University of California, San Francisco
Samuel D. Rabkin
Samuel D. Rabkin Harvard University
Allan I. Basbaum
Allan I. Basbaum University of California, San Francisco
Jon D. Levine
Jon D. Levine University of California, San Francisco
Earl Carstens
Earl Carstens University of California, Davis
Wilfrid Jänig
Wilfrid Jänig Kiel University
Patrick W. Mantyh
Patrick W. Mantyh University of Arizona
Alice A. Larson
Alice A. Larson University of Minnesota
Webb Miller
Webb Miller Pennsylvania State University
Thomas J. Hudson
Thomas J. Hudson Ontario Institute for Cancer Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA opens doors to a broad spectrum of online degrees and career opportunities in related fields. Many students interested in brain science also consider mental health professions, behavioral research, and clinical support roles.

For those looking to make an impact in social work, accelerated msw programs online offer a fast-track route to earn a Master of Social Work, preparing graduates for client advocacy and mental health services. Aspiring psychologists can consider an accelerated online bachelor's degree in psychology, which is ideal for students aiming to understand human behavior and build a foundation for advanced study or entry-level careers.

If counseling is your goal, there are cacrep-accredited online counseling programs that meet rigorous accreditation standards and equip graduates with core therapeutic skills. Additionally, pursuing an online master's in counseling can open doors to private practice, school counseling, or specialized clinical roles.

Each of these pathways complements a neuroscience background and provides flexible, affordable options for students pursuing diverse careers in mental and behavioral health.

Best Scientists Citing Luc Jasmin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles