World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Leo Eisner publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Leo Eisner between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Leo Eisner published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2013. 15 of the 192 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2013. 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 9 publications
1996 2025

192 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Leo Eisner: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 2
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 3
2002 3
2003 0
2004 1
2005 4
2006 9
2007 5
2008 7
2009 9
2010 12
2011 11
2012 8
2013 17
2014 17
2015 7
2016 10
2017 12
2018 8
2019 8
2020 7
2021 5
2022 7
2023 5
2024 6
2025 9
Total 192
Download as CSV

Leo Eisner publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leo Eisner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Leo Eisner D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leo Eisner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Leo Eisner is affiliated with the Czech Academy of Sciences in the Czech Republic. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a significant emphasis on Geophysics and related subfields.

The scientist's work spans multiple domains within Earth sciences, including Artificial Intelligence applications in geophysical contexts, Ocean Engineering, Environmental Engineering, and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics.

Key topics in their research include:

  • Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
  • Seismic Waves and Analysis
  • Seismology and Earthquake Studies
  • Earthquake and Tectonic Studies
  • CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Geophysics and Sensor Technology
  • Economic, Financial, and Policy Analysis

Leo Eisner has published extensively on microseismic monitoring and seismic event location techniques. Notable recent papers include:

  • Recent Advances and Challenges of Waveform-Based Seismic Location Methods at Multiple Scales, 2020, Reviews of Geophysics
  • Machine Learning in Microseismic Monitoring, 2023, Earth-Science Reviews
  • Next Record Breaking Magnitude for Injection Induced Seismicity, 2020, First Break
  • Traveltime-based Microseismic Event Location Using Artificial Neural Network, 2022, Frontiers in Earth Science
  • Localizing Weak Microseismic Events Using Transfer Learning With a Deep Neural Network, 2022, Geophysical Prospecting

The publication venues where Leo Eisner frequently appears include:

  • First Break
  • Geophysical Prospecting
  • Seismological Research Letters
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Reviews of Geophysics

Collaboration is a significant component of Eisner's research activity, with frequent co-authors being:

  • Umair bin Waheed
  • Zuzana Jechumtálová
  • Dmitry Alexandrov
  • František Staněk
  • James P. Verdon

Best Publications

  • The finite-difference time-domain method for modeling of seismic wave propagation

    Peter Moczo;Johan O.A. Robertsson;Leo Eisner

  • Reservoir characterization using surface microseismic monitoring

    Peter M. Duncan;Leo Eisner

  • Felt seismicity associated with shale gas hydraulic fracturing: The first documented example in Europe

    Huw Clarke;Leo Eisner;Peter Styles;Peter Turner

  • Uncertainties in passive seismic monitoring

    Leo Eisner;Peter M. Duncan;Werner M. Heigl;William R. Keller

  • Comparison of surface and borehole locations of induced seismicity

    Leo Eisner;B. J. Hulsey;Peter Duncan;Dana Jurick

  • Non-double-couple mechanisms of microearthquakes induced by hydraulic fracturing

    Jan Šílený;David P. Hill;Leo Eisner;Francois H. Cornet

  • Recent advances and challenges of waveform‐based seismic location methods at multiple scales

    Lei Li;Jingqiang Tan;Benjamin Schwarz;František Staněk

  • Beyond the dots in the box: Microseismicity-constrained fracture models for reservoir simulation

    Leo Eisner;Sherilyn Williams-Stroud;Andrew Hill;Peter Duncan

  • Microseismic signatures of hydraulic fracture growth in sediment formations: Observations and modeling

    T. Fischer;S. Hainzl;L. Eisner;S. A. Shapiro

  • Joint location and source mechanism inversion of microseismic events: benchmarking on seismicity induced by hydraulic fracturing

    D. Anikiev;J. Valenta;F. Staněk;L. Eisner

  • Simultaneous microseismic event localization and source mechanism determination

    Oksana Zhebel;Leo Eisner

  • New model explaining inverted source mechanisms of microseismic events induced by hydraulic fracturing

    František Stanek;Leo Eisner

  • A technique for identifying microseismic multiplets and application to the Valhall field, North Sea

    Stephen J. Arrowsmith;Leo Eisner

  • Prediction of magnitude of the largest potentially induced seismic event

    Miroslav Hallo;Ivo Oprsal;Leo Eisner;Mohammed Y. Ali

  • Noise suppression for detection and location of microseismic events using a matched filter

    Leo Eisner;David Abbott;William B. Barker;James Lakings

  • The peak frequency of direct waves for microseismic events

    Leo Eisner;Davide Gei;Miroslav Hallo;Ivo Opršal

  • A Reciprocity Method for Multiple-Source Simulations

    Leo Eisner;Robert W. Clayton

  • Seismicity Induced by Hydraulic Fracturing in Shales: A Bedding Plane Slip Model

    František Staněk;František Staněk;Leo Eisner

  • Feasibility of joint 1D velocity model and event location inversion by the Neighbourhood algorithm

    Jaromir Jansky;Vladimir Plicka;Leo Eisner

  • Non-double-couple Mechanisms of Microearthquakes Induced by Hydraulic Fracturing

    J. Sileny;L. Eisner;D. P. Hill;F. H. Cornet

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert W. Clayton
Robert W. Clayton California Institute of Technology
Gunther Kletetschka
Gunther Kletetschka Charles University
Luciano Telesca
Luciano Telesca National Research Council (CNR)
Vladimir Grechka
Vladimir Grechka Marathon Oil (United States)
David P. Hill
David P. Hill United States Geological Survey
Serge A. Shapiro
Serge A. Shapiro Freie Universität Berlin
Yaoguo Li
Yaoguo Li Colorado School of Mines
Jan Šílený
Jan Šílený Czech Academy of Sciences
Martin Landrø
Martin Landrø Norwegian University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science can open doors to diverse career opportunities. Many students complement their studies with related online degrees to enhance their expertise and employability. For instance, pursuing an online degree in Spanish can be valuable for Earth Science professionals working in international or bilingual environments, enabling better communication and cultural understanding.

Military veterans interested in Earth Science have tailored options, such as programs designed specifically for them. Learning about the online spanish degree for military veterans highlights how flexible, veteran-friendly pathways can support career transitions or advancement in the environmental sector.

Creatives might consider the intersection between science and the arts. An online mfa creative writing degree allows for developing skills in science communication and storytelling, crucial for raising public awareness about environmental issues.

Additionally, leadership roles in Earth Science organizations often require strong management capabilities. Earning an online masters in human resource management can prepare professionals for these challenges by enhancing their skills in team and organizational management.

Best Scientists Citing Leo Eisner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles