World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
6041
World Ranking
10732
National Ranking
4481

Lalit Keshav Mestha publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lalit Keshav Mestha sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 334 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Lalit Keshav Mestha D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lalit Keshav Mestha sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow, National Academy of Inventors
  • 2011 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to digital printing systems control

Overview

Lalit Keshav Mestha is affiliated with General Electric in the United States and specializes in research at the intersection of medicine and engineering, with a focus on biomedical engineering, cardiology, and surgical applications. Their contributions span fields including non-invasive vital sign monitoring, heart rate variability and autonomic control, as well as hemodynamic monitoring and therapy.

Their recent research outputs include studies published in reputable venues such as Scientific Reports and IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. Notable papers include "Conventional pulse transit times as markers of blood pressure changes in humans" (2020, Scientific Reports) and "Photoplethysmography Fast Upstroke Time Intervals Can Be Useful Features for Cuff-Less Measurement of Blood Pressure Changes in Humans" (2021, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering).

Frequent co-authors associated with this scientist are:

  • Robert Block
  • Mohammad Yavarimanesh
  • Keerthana Natarajan
  • Anand Chandrasekhar
  • Omer T. Inan

These collaborations indicate a multidisciplinary approach, often intersecting engineering principles with clinical and physiological applications.

Their main fields of study are:

  • Medicine
  • Engineering

The detailed subfields of study covered in their publications include:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery

Themes that recur throughout their research work involve:

  • Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy

Recognition of their professional achievements includes the following awards:

  • Fellow, National Academy of Inventors (2018)
  • IEEE Fellow (2011) for contributions to digital printing systems control

Best Publications

  • Toward Ubiquitous Blood Pressure Monitoring via Pulse Transit Time: Theory and Practice.

    Ramakrishna Mukkamala;Jin Oh Hahn;Omer T. Inan;Lalit K. Mestha

  • Diagnostics for color printer on-line spectrophotometer control system

    Fred F. Hubble;Tonya L. Love;Lalit K. Mestha;Gary W. Skinner

  • Detection of atrial fibrillation using contactless facial video monitoring

    Jean-Philippe Couderc;Survi Kyal;Lalit K. Mestha;Beilei Xu

  • Determining cardiac arrhythmia from a video of a subject being monitored for cardiac function

    Lalit Keshav Mestha;Beilei Xu;Paul R. Austin

  • Web enabled color management service system and method

    Lalit Keshav Mestha;Peter Stanley Fisher

  • Systems and methods for non-contact heart rate sensing

    Lalit K. Mestha;Beilei Xu

  • Full-width array spectrophotometer, method for full-width scan color analysis of collar inspection object, and method for perfect transverse-directional scan color analysis of color printing sheet

    Steven B Bolte;Lalit K Mestha;Jagdish C Tandon;シー.タンドン ジャグディシュ

  • Processing a video for vascular pattern detection and cardiac function analysis

    Lalit Keshav Mestha;Beilei Xu;Edgar A. Bernal

  • Estimating cardiac pulse recovery from multi-channel source data via constrained source separation

    Lalit Keshav Mestha;Survi Kyal;Gill Rafael Tsouri;Sohail A. Dianat

  • Towards continuous monitoring of pulse rate in neonatal intensive care unit with a webcam.

    Lalit K. Mestha;Survi Kyal;Beilei Xu;Leslie E.dward Lewis

  • System and method for spatial gray balance calibration using hybrid sensing systems

    R. Enrique Viturro;Lalit K. Mestha

  • Video-based estimation of heart rate variability

    Lalit Keshav Mestha;Survi Kyal;Beilei Xu;Himanshu J. Madhu

  • Attack Detection for Securing Cyber Physical Systems

    Weizhong Yan;Lalit K. Mestha;Masoud Abbaszadeh

  • Method for calibrating a marking system to maintain color output consistency across multiple printers

    R. Viturro;Lalit Mestha

  • Gray balance for a printing system of multiple marking engines

    R. Viturro;Lalit Mestha

  • Fabry-perot tunable filter systems and methods

    Pinyen Lin;Lalit K Mestha;Peter M Gulvin;Yao Rong Wang

  • Monitoring respiration with a thermal imaging system

    Beilei Xu;Lalit Keshav Mestha;Graham Pennington

  • Iterative printer control and color balancing system and method using a high quantization resolution halftone array to achieve improved image quality with reduced processing overhead

    Jean-Pierre R. M. van de Capelle;Lalit K. Mestha;Robert P. Loce;Raja Bala

  • System and method for automated spot color editor

    Joseph D. Hancock;Peter S. Fisher;Lalit K. Mestha;Kenneth J. Mihalyov

  • Systems and methods for determining spectra using dynamic karhunen-loeve algorithms with measurements from led color sensor

    Lingappa K. Mestha;Sohail A. Dianat

  • Continuous cardiac pulse rate estimation from multi-channel source video data

    Survi Kyal;Lalit Keshav Mestha;Beilei Xu

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert P. Loce
Robert P. Loce Datto, Inc.
Chiman Kwan
Chiman Kwan Signal Processing (United States)
Gaurav Sharma
Gaurav Sharma University of Rochester
Baomin Xu
Baomin Xu Southern University of Science and Technology
Perry Y. Li
Perry Y. Li University of Minnesota
Omer T. Inan
Omer T. Inan Georgia Institute of Technology
Reiner Eschbach
Reiner Eschbach Norwegian University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When exploring study options in Computer Science in the USA, it’s important to consider a range of online degrees that can align with various career goals and budget needs. For many students, starting with an associates degree offers a quick, flexible path into tech careers or as a stepping stone toward higher education.

Those aiming to deepen their expertise may benefit from affordable masters degrees, which can unlock specialized roles in areas like data science, cybersecurity, or software engineering. For future leaders in education or business, pursuing an online edd or an online phd in organizational leadership can lead to executive, research, or administrative positions within academia and the tech industry.

Online programs offer flexibility for working professionals and those balancing multiple commitments. Many of these pathways provide opportunities for career advancement and increased earning potential, making them a valuable consideration for anyone planning a long-term career in Computer Science.

Best Scientists Citing Lalit Keshav Mestha

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles