World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Klaus-Peter Ossenkopp

Klaus-Peter Ossenkopp

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
61
Citations
10612
World Ranking
3734
National Ranking
214

Klaus-Peter Ossenkopp publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus-Peter Ossenkopp sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 210 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Klaus-Peter Ossenkopp D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus-Peter Ossenkopp sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Klaus-Peter Ossenkopp is affiliated with the University of Western Ontario in Canada and has contributed extensively to the fields of neuroscience and psychology. Their research primarily focuses on neuroendocrine regulation and behavior, with significant attention to psychological and sensory processes.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Within these broader disciplines, their work delves into several subfields, such as:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Social Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Sensory Systems

Key research topics addressed by Ossenkopp involve:

  • Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research

Their frequent publication venues reflect interdisciplinary engagement, including:

  • Behavioural Brain Research
  • Hormones and Behavior
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Developmental Psychobiology
  • Biology Letters

Collaboration is notable in Ossenkopp's research, with frequent coauthors such as:

  • Martin Kavaliers
  • Indra R. Bishnoi
  • Elena Choleris
  • Cashmeira-Dove Tyson
  • Vangel Matic

Selected recent papers demonstrate diverse thematic interests and publication output:

  • Sex and age differences in locomotor and anxiety-like behaviors in rats: From adolescence to adulthood (2020, Developmental Psychobiology)
  • Pathogens, odors, and disgust in rodents (2020, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews)
  • Differential effects of progesterone on social recognition and the avoidance of pathogen threat by female mice (2020, Hormones and Behavior)
  • Social factors and the neurobiology of pathogen avoidance (2022, Biology Letters)
  • Infection, learning, and memory: Focus on immune activation and aversive conditioning (2022, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews)

Best Publications

  • Neurobiological effects of intraventricular propionic acid in rats: possible role of short chain fatty acids on the pathogenesis and characteristics of autism spectrum disorders.

    Derrick F. MacFabe;Donald P. Cain;Karina Rodriguez-Capote;Andrew E. Franklin

  • Effects of the enteric bacterial metabolic product propionic acid on object-directed behavior, social behavior, cognition, and neuroinflammation in adolescent rats: Relevance to autism spectrum disorder.

    Derrick F. MacFabe;Nathan E. Cain;Francis Boon;Klaus-Peter Ossenkopp

  • Sex differences in performance in the Morris water maze and the effects of initial nonstationary hidden platform training.

    Tara S. Perrot-Sinal;Marcia A. Kostenuik;Klaus-Peter Ossenkopp;Martin Kavaliers

  • Gonadal Hormone Levels and Spatial Learning Performance in the Morris Water Maze in Male and Female Meadow Voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus

    Liisa A. M. Galea;M. Kavaliers;K.-P. Ossenkopp;E. Hampson

  • Intracerebroventricular Injection of Propionic Acid, an Enteric Bacterial Metabolic End-Product, Impairs Social Behavior in the Rat: Implications for an Animal Model of Autism

    Sandy R. Shultz;Derrick F. MacFabe;Klaus Peter Ossenkopp;Shannon Scratch

  • SEXUALLY DIMORPHIC SPATIAL LEARNING IN MEADOW VOLES MICROTUS PENNSYLVANICUS AND DEER MICE PEROMYSCUS MANICULATUS

    Liisa A. M. Galea;Martin Kavaliers;Klaus-Peter Ossenkopp

  • Sexually dimorphic spatial learning varies seasonally in two populations of deer mice.

    L.A.M. Galea;M. Kavaliers;K.-P. Ossenkopp;D. Innes

  • Intracerebroventricular injections of the enteric bacterial metabolic product propionic acid impair cognition and sensorimotor ability in the Long-Evans rat: further development of a rodent model of autism.

    Sandy R. Shultz;Derrick F. MacFabe;Samantha Martin;Jordana Jackson

  • Possible mechanisms by which extremely low frequency magnetic fields affect opioid function.

    Frank S. Prato;Jeffrey J. L. Carson;Klaus-Peter Ossenkopp;Martin Kavaliers

  • Taste reactivity responses in rats: influence of sex and the estrous cycle

    Sharon N. D. A. Clarke;Klaus-Peter Ossenkopp

  • A Novel Rodent Model of Autism: Intraventricular Infusions of Propionic Acid Increase Locomotor Activity and Induce Neuroinflammation and Oxidative Stress in Discrete Regions of Adult Rat Brain

    Derrick F. MacFabe;Karina Rodríguez-Capote;Jennifer E. Hoffman;Andrew E. Franklin

  • Pre- and neonatal exposure to lipopolysaccharide or the enteric metabolite, propionic acid, alters development and behavior in adolescent rats in a sexually dimorphic manner.

    Kelly A. Foley;Klaus-Peter Ossenkopp;Martin Kavaliers;Derrick F. MacFabe

  • Pain perception and electromagnetic fields.

    Cristina Del Seppia;Sergio Ghione;Paolo Luschi;Klaus-Peter Ossenkopp

  • Sexually dimorphic effects of prenatal exposure to propionic acid and lipopolysaccharide on social behavior in neonatal, adolescent, and adult rats: implications for autism spectrum disorders.

    Kelly A. Foley;Derrick F. MacFabe;Alisha Vaz;Klaus-Peter Ossenkopp

  • Antinociceptive effects of a pulsed magnetic field in the land snail, Cepaea nemoralis

    Alex W. Thomas;Alex W. Thomas;Martin Kavaliers;Frank S Prato;Klaus-Peter Ossenkopp

  • Pulsed Magnetic Field Induced “Analgesia” in the Land Snail, Cepaea nemoralis, and the Effects of μ, δ, and κ Opioid Receptor Agonists/Antagonists

    A.W Thomas;M Kavaliers;F.S Prato;K.-P Ossenkopp

  • Sexually dimorphic effects of prenatal exposure to lipopolysaccharide, and prenatal and postnatal exposure to propionic acid, on acoustic startle response and prepulse inhibition in adolescent rats: relevance to autism spectrum disorders.

    Kelly A. Foley;Derrick F. MacFabe;Martin Kavaliers;Klaus-Peter Ossenkopp

  • Toxin-induced conditioned changes in taste reactivity and the role of the chemosensitive area postrema.

    Klaus-Peter Ossenkopp;Lisa A. Eckel

  • Brief predator odour exposure activates the HPA axis independent of locomotor changes.

    Perrot-Sinal Ts;Ossenkopp Kp;Kavaliers M

  • Bird orientation and the geomagnetic field: A review

    Klaus-Peter Ossenkopp;Raphael Barbeito

  • Magnetic field inhibition of morphine-induced analgesia and behavioral activity in mice: evidence for involvement of calcium ions.

    Martin Kavaliers;Klaus-Peter Ossenkopp

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Kavaliers
Martin Kavaliers University of Western Ontario
Donald P. Cain
Donald P. Cain University of Western Ontario
Paul R. Sanberg
Paul R. Sanberg University of South Florida
Linda A. Parker
Linda A. Parker University of Guelph
Elena Choleris
Elena Choleris University of Guelph
Michael A. Persinger
Michael A. Persinger Laurentian University
Dwight Mazmanian
Dwight Mazmanian Lakehead University
Liisa A.M. Galea
Liisa A.M. Galea University of British Columbia
Paola Valsecchi
Paola Valsecchi University of Parma
Sari M. van Anders
Sari M. van Anders Queen's University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in neuroscience, you’ll find many online degree options that complement or provide alternative pathways into the field. Many students explore degrees in psychology, social work, or counseling to enhance their career prospects or build a strong foundation before specializing further.

Those eager to fast-track their education might consider accelerated psychology bachelor's degree programs, which often enable you to complete the curriculum more quickly than traditional routes. For prospective graduate students, accelerated msw programs without bsw are a popular option for entering advanced social work careers even if you don't hold an undergraduate degree in social work.

Counseling is another closely related field. You might want to explore the cacrep accredited online programs, which ensure rigorous standards for counseling education. Additionally, pursuing a counseling bachelor's degree online can prepare you for diverse roles in mental health, guidance, or support services.

These programs share foundational knowledge applicable to neuroscience careers, including research skills, behavioral science, and therapeutic techniques. By choosing the right online pathway, you can align your educational journey with your neuroscience ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Klaus-Peter Ossenkopp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles