World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
80
Citations
35381
World Ranking
3995
National Ranking
1973

Kevin R. Coombes publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin R. Coombes sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 374 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Kevin R. Coombes D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin R. Coombes sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kevin R. Coombes is affiliated with The Ohio State University in the United States. Their research spans several fields with a focus on biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine. Within these areas, they have contributed extensively to molecular biology, cancer research, genetics, artificial intelligence, and hematology.

The scientist's work centers on topics such as gene expression and cancer classification, cancer genomics and diagnostics, acute myeloid leukemia research, chronic lymphocytic leukemia research, RNA modifications and cancer, cancer-related molecular mechanisms research, and molecular biology techniques and applications.

Recent publications include:

  • Intratumoral Heterogeneity and Clonal Evolution Induced by HPV Integration, 2023, Cancer Discovery
  • Diverse tumorigenic consequences of human papillomavirus integration in primary oropharyngeal cancers, 2021, Genome Research
  • DNA methylation epitypes highlight underlying developmental and disease pathways in acute myeloid leukemia, 2021, Genome Research
  • Unsupervised machine learning and prognostic factors of survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, 2020, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • Simulation-derived best practices for clustering clinical data, 2021, Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Kevin R. Coombes frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Zachary B. Abrams
  • Lynne V. Abruzzo
  • Caitlin E. Coombes
  • James S. Blachly
  • Amir Asiaee

The scientist has published multiple times in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Bioinformatics, F1000Research, Cancer Genetics, and Cancers. Their most frequent publication venue is bioRxiv, with 13 publications.

Best Publications

  • Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours

    Daniel C. Koboldt;Robert S. Fulton;Michael D. McLellan;Heather Schmidt

  • An Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition Gene Signature Predicts Resistance to EGFR and PI3K Inhibitors and Identifies Axl as a Therapeutic Target for Overcoming EGFR Inhibitor Resistance

    Lauren Averett Byers;Lixia Diao;Jing Wang;Pierre Saintigny

  • MicroRNA signatures associated with cytogenetics and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia

    Ramiro Garzon;Stefano Volinia;Stefano Volinia;Chang-Gong Liu;Cecilia Fernandez-Cymering

  • Reproducibility of SELDI-TOF protein patterns in serum: comparing datasets from different experiments

    Keith A. Baggerly;Jeffrey S. Morris;Kevin R. Coombes

  • Co-occurring Genomic Alterations Define Major Subsets of KRAS-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma with Distinct Biology, Immune Profiles, and Therapeutic Vulnerabilities

    Ferdinandos Skoulidis;Lauren A. Byers;Lixia Diao;Vassiliki A. Papadimitrakopoulou

  • Effect of KRAS Oncogene Substitutions on Protein Behavior: Implications for Signaling and Clinical Outcome

    Nathan T. Ihle;Lauren Averett Byers;Edward S. Kim;Pierre Saintigny

  • Proteomic Profiling Identifies Dysregulated Pathways in Small Cell Lung Cancer and Novel Therapeutic Targets Including PARP1

    Lauren Averett Byers;Jing Wang;Monique B. Nilsson;Junya Fujimoto

  • Curcumin (diferuloylmethane) alters the expression profiles of microRNAs in human pancreatic cancer cells.

    Michael Sun;Zeev Estrov;Yuan Ji;Kevin R. Coombes

  • Improved peak detection and quantification of mass spectrometry data acquired from surface-enhanced laser desorption and ionization by denoising spectra with the undecimated discrete wavelet transform

    Kevin R. Coombes;Spiridon Tsavachidis;Jeffrey Morris;Keith A Baggerly

  • A Patient-Derived, Pan-Cancer EMT Signature Identifies Global Molecular Alterations and Immune Target Enrichment Following Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition.

    Milena P. Mak;Milena P. Mak;Pan Tong;Lixia Diao;Robert J. Cardnell

  • Expression of Autotaxin and Lysophosphatidic Acid Receptors Increases Mammary Tumorigenesis, Invasion, and Metastases

    Shuying Liu;Makiko Umezu-Goto;Mandi Murph;Yiling Lu

  • Feature extraction and quantification for mass spectrometry in biomedical applications using the mean spectrum

    Jeffrey S. Morris;Kevin R. Coombes;John Koomen;Keith A. Baggerly

  • Signal in noise: Evaluating reported reproducibility of serum proteomic tests for ovarian cancer

    Keith A. Baggerly;Jeffrey S. Morris;Sarah R. Edmonson;Kevin R. Coombes

  • Deriving chemosensitivity from cell lines: Forensic bioinformatics and reproducible research in high-throughput biology

    Keith A. Baggerly;Kevin R. Coombes

  • MicroRNA fingerprinting of CLL patients with chromosome 17p deletion identify a miR-21 score that stratifies early survival

    Simona Rossi;Masayoshi Shimizu;Elisa Barbarotto;Milena S. Nicoloso

  • Quality Control and Peak Finding for Proteomics Data Collected from Nipple Aspirate Fluid by Surface-Enhanced Laser Desorption and Ionization

    Kevin R. Coombes;Herbert A. Fritsche;Charlotte Clarke;Jeng Neng Chen

  • Functional proteomic profiling of AML predicts response and survival

    Steven M. Kornblau;Raoul Tibes;Yi Hua Qiu;Wenjing Chen

  • Non-parametric quantification of protein lysate arrays

    Jianhua Hu;Xuming He;Keith A. Baggerly;Kevin R. Coombes

  • A Technical Assessment of the Utility of Reverse Phase Protein Arrays for the Study of the Functional Proteome in Non-microdissected Human Breast Cancers

    Bryan T. Hennessy;Yiling Lu;Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo;Mark S. Carey

  • Direct tandem mass spectrometry reveals limitations in protein profiling experiments for plasma biomarker discovery.

    John M. Koomen;Donghui Li;Lian Chun Xiao;Thomas C. Liu

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven M. Kornblau
Steven M. Kornblau The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Jing Wang
Jing Wang The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
John V. Heymach
John V. Heymach The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Keith A. Baggerly
Keith A. Baggerly The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
John D. Minna
John D. Minna The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Michael Andreeff
Michael Andreeff The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Ignacio I. Wistuba
Ignacio I. Wistuba The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Lixia Diao
Lixia Diao The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Gordon B. Mills
Gordon B. Mills Oregon Health & Science University
Luc Girard
Luc Girard The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in pursuing a career in Biology, Biochemistry, or related health sciences? There are many flexible online pathways to launch your career or advance your credentials. For those seeking entry-level positions in healthcare, online medical assistant programs fafsa approved allow you to gain industry-recognized skills, while also potentially qualifying for federal financial aid.

If you’re already a Certified Medical Assistant and want to level up, consider cma to lpn bridge programs online. These bridge programs offer streamlined training to become a Licensed Practical Nurse, often on a flexible schedule.

For students eager to fast-track their undergraduate studies, an accelerated bachelor's degree in biology online allows you to complete your degree in less time and prepare for graduate school or work in research, biotechnology, or medical fields.

Lastly, those aiming for a nursing career can explore online asn programs, which prepare you for the NCLEX-RN exam and entry-level roles as a Registered Nurse. These online pathways open up rewarding jobs and provide flexible options for advancing your education in the sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Kevin R. Coombes

Trending Scientists