World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
35
Citations
5309
World Ranking
6741
National Ranking
101

Kam Hung publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kam Hung sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 302 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 134 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Kam Hung D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kam Hung sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 261 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Impact of hotel website quality on online booking intentions: eTrust as a mediator

    Liang Wang;Rob Law;Basak Denizci Guillet;Kam Hung

  • Why do you cruise? Exploring the motivations for taking cruise holidays, and the construction of a cruising motivation scale

    Kam Hung;James F. Petrick

  • Testing the effects of congruity, travel constraints, and self-efficacy on travel intentions: An alternative decision-making model

    Kam Hung;James F. Petrick

  • DEVELOPING A MEASUREMENT SCALE FOR CONSTRAINTS TO CRUISING

    Kam Hung;James F. Petrick

  • Testing the Efficacy of an Integrative Model for Community Participation

    Kam Hung;Ercan Sirakaya-Turk;Linda J. Ingram

  • Consumer trust in tourism and hospitality: A review of the literature

    Liang Wang;Rob Law;Kam Hung;Basak Denizci Guillet

  • Motivations for entrepreneurship in the tourism and hospitality sector: a social cognitive theory perspective.

    Sha Wang;Kam Hung;Wei Jue Huang

  • An overview of Internet-based surveys in hospitality and tourism journals

    Kam Hung;Rob Law

  • The Role of Self- and Functional Congruity in Cruising Intentions

    Kam Hung;James F. Petrick

  • Do perceptions of time affect outbound-travel motivations and intention? An investigation among Chinese seniors

    Jiaying Lu;Kam Hung;Lili Wang;Michael A. Schuett

  • Benefits and Constraints Associated with the Use of an Urban Park Reported by a Sample of Elderly in Hong Kong

    Kam Hung;John L. Crompton

  • Wine tourism phenomena in China: an emerging market

    Hanqin Zhang Qiu;Jingxue Jessica Yuan;Ben Haobin Ye;Kam Hung

  • Customer perceptions of critical success factors for guest houses

    Sha Wang;Kam Hung

  • Exploring Antecedents of Employee Turnover Intention – Evidence of China’s Hotel Industry

    Hanqin Qiu;Ben Haobin Ye;Kam Hung;Qi Yan York

  • Attachment to the home country or hometown? Examining diaspora tourism across migrant generations

    Unknown

  • The impact of landscape views and storey levels on property prices

    Eddie C.M. Hui;Jia Wei Zhong;Ka Hung Yu

  • Relative Climate Index and Its Effect on Seasonal Tourism Demand

    Hengyun Li;Carey Goh;Kam Hung;Jason Li Chen

  • Why immigrants travel to their home places : Social capital and acculturation perspective

    Kam Hung;Honggen Xiao;Xiaotao Yang

  • Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis as a Mixed-Method and Analysis Technique: A Comprehensive Systematic Review

    Unknown

  • Assessing servicescape of cruise tourism: the perception of Chinese tourists

    Jiaying Lyu;Liang Hu;Kam Hung;Zhenxing Mao

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below: