World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
43
Citations
7225
World Ranking
7093
National Ranking
455

Jutta Niggemann publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jutta Niggemann sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 152 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Jutta Niggemann D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jutta Niggemann sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Global charcoal mobilization from soils via dissolution and riverine transport to the oceans

    Rudolf Jaffé;Yan Ding;Jutta Niggemann;Anssi V. Vähätalo;Anssi V. Vähätalo

  • Biogeochemically diverse organic matter in Alpine glaciers and its downstream fate

    Gabriel A. Singer;Christina Fasching;Linda Wilhelm;Jutta Niggemann

  • Deciphering ocean carbon in a changing world

    Mary Ann Moran;Elizabeth B. Kujawinski;Aron Stubbins;Rob Fatland

  • Biogeochemistry of dissolved organic matter in an anoxic intertidal creek bank

    Michael Seidel;Melanie Beck;Thomas Riedel;Hannelore Waska

  • Photo-lability of deep ocean dissolved black carbon

    A. Stubbins;J. Niggemann;T. Dittmar

  • Linking the Molecular Signature of Heteroatomic Dissolved Organic Matter to Watershed Characteristics in World Rivers

    Sasha Wagner;Thomas Riedel;Jutta Niggemann;Anssi V. Vähätalo

  • Anaerobic oxidation of methane and sulfate reduction along the Chilean continental margin

    Tina Treude;Jutta Niggemann;Jens Kallmeyer;Paul Wintersteller

  • Continuous flux of dissolved black carbon from a vanished tropical forest biome

    Thorsten Dittmar;Carlos Eduardo de Rezende;Marcus Manecki;Jutta Niggemann

  • Fate of the Amazon River dissolved organic matter in the tropical Atlantic Ocean

    Patrícia Matheus Medeiros;Michael Seidel;Michael Seidel;Nicholas D Ward;Nicholas D Ward;Edward J Carpenter

  • An intercomparison of three methods for the large-scale isolation of oceanic dissolved organic matter

    Nelson W. Green;E. Michael Perdue;George R. Aiken;Kenna D. Butler

  • Inefficient microbial production of refractory dissolved organic matter in the ocean.

    Helena Osterholz;Jutta Niggemann;Helge-Ansgar Giebel;Meinhard Simon

  • Molecular Signatures of Biogeochemical Transformations in Dissolved Organic Matter from Ten World Rivers

    Thomas Riedel;Maren Zark;Anssi V. Vähätalo;Jutta Niggemann

  • Deciphering associations between dissolved organic molecules and bacterial communities in a pelagic marine system.

    Helena Osterholz;Gabriel Singer;Bernd Wemheuer;Rolf Daniel

  • Cyanate and urea are substrates for nitrification by Thaumarchaeota in the marine environment.

    Katharina Kitzinger;Katharina Kitzinger;Cory C. Padilla;Hannah K. Marchant;Philipp F. Hach

  • Aerosols as a source of dissolved black carbon to the ocean.

    Hongyan Bao;Jutta Niggemann;Li Luo;Thorsten Dittmar

  • ICBM-OCEAN: Processing Ultrahigh-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Data of Complex Molecular Mixtures

    Julian Merder;Jan Alfred Freund;Ulrike Feudel;Christian T. Hansen

  • Diatom fucan polysaccharide precipitates carbon during algal blooms

    Silvia Vidal-Melgosa;Silvia Vidal-Melgosa;Andreas Sichert;Andreas Sichert;T. Ben Francis;Daniel Bartosik

  • The drivers of biogeochemistry in beach ecosystems: A cross-shore transect from the dunes to the low-water line

    Melanie Beck;Anja Reckhardt;Julia Amelsberg;Alexander Bartholomä

  • Ammonia-oxidizing archaea release a suite of organic compounds potentially fueling prokaryotic heterotrophy in the ocean

    Barbara Bayer;Roberta L. Hansman;Roberta L. Hansman;Meriel J. Bittner;Beatriz E. Noriega‐Ortega

  • Utilizing colored dissolved organic matter to derive dissolved black carbon export by arctic rivers

    Aron Stubbins;Robert G. M. Spencer;Paul J. Mann;R. Max Holmes

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open doors to diverse career pathways. Advanced education, such as eds to edd programs, allows professionals to deepen their knowledge in environmental policy, education, and leadership roles.

Additionally, careers that focus on social impact and wellbeing can benefit from specialized online training such as dsw programs online. These programs blend environmental and social work principles, expanding opportunities in community development and sustainability sectors.

For those seeking flexible and budget-friendly options, pursuing an online general studies bachelor degree cheap can provide foundational knowledge applicable to environmental careers, with the option to specialize later.

Moreover, students looking for manageable coursework while balancing other commitments might consider pursuing some of the easiest bachelor degree programs online. These can serve as a stepping stone toward more focused environmental science studies or related fields.