World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
34
Citations
6484
World Ranking
2788
National Ranking
36

Johannes G.M. Kuerten publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johannes G.M. Kuerten sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 246 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Johannes G.M. Kuerten D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johannes G.M. Kuerten sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Large-eddy simulation of the turbulent mixing layer

    Bert Vreman;Bernard Geurts;Hans Kuerten

  • On the formulation of the dynamic mixed subgrid-scale model

    Bert Vreman;Bernard Geurts;Hans Kuerten

  • Realizability conditions for the turbulent stress tensor in large-eddy simulation

    Bert Vreman;Bernard Geurts;Hans Kuerten

  • Statistics of particle dispersion in direct numerical simulations of wall-bounded turbulence: Results of an international collaborative benchmark test

    C. Marchioli;A. Soldati;J. G M Kuerten;B. Arcen

  • A priori tests of large eddy simulation of the compressible plane mixing layer

    Bert Vreman;Bernard Geurts;Hans Kuerten

  • Point-Particle DNS and LES of Particle-Laden Turbulent flow - a state-of-the-art review

    Unknown

  • Subgrid-modelling in LES of Compressible Flow

    Bert Vreman;Bernard Geurts;Hans Kuerten

  • Comparison of direct numerical simulation databases of turbulent channel flow at Re τ = 180

    Unknown

  • Large-eddy simulation of the temporal mixing layer using the Clark model

    Bert Vreman;Bernard Geurts;Hans Kuerten

  • Comparison of numerical schemes in large eddy simulation of the temporal mixing layer

    Bert Vreman;Bernard Geurts;Hans Kuerten

  • Subgrid modeling in particle-laden channel flow

    Unknown

  • Can turbophoresis be predicted by large-eddy simulation?

    Unknown

  • Subgrid-modelling in LES of compressible flow

    Unknown

  • CFD analysis with fluid-structure interaction of opening high-pressure safety valves

    Unknown

  • Modeling the evaporation of sessile multi-component droplets

    C. Diddens;Johannes G.M. Kuerten;Johannes G.M. Kuerten;C.W.M. van der Geld;H.M.A. Wijshoff

  • Turbulence modification and heat transfer enhancement by inertial particles in turbulent channel flow

    Johannes G.M. Kuerten;C.W.M. van der Geld;Bernardus J. Geurts

  • Simulation techniques for spatially evolving instabilities in compressible flow over a flat plate

    B. Wasistho;Bernardus J. Geurts;Johannes G.M. Kuerten

  • Statistics of spatial derivatives of velocity and pressure in turbulent channel flow

    Unknown

  • A boundary integral method for two-dimensional (non)-Newtonian drops in slow viscous flow

    EM Toose;BJ Bernard Geurts;Jgm Hans Kuerten

  • Dynamic inverse modeling and its testing in large-eddy simulations of the mixing layer

    J.G.M. Kuerten;B.J. Geurts;A.W. Vreman;M. Germano

Frequent Co-Authors

Bernardus J. Geurts
Bernardus J. Geurts University of Twente
Luca Ridolfi
Luca Ridolfi Polytechnic University of Turin
Willem Norde
Willem Norde Wageningen University & Research
Kyle D. Squires
Kyle D. Squires Arizona State University
Maria Vittoria Salvetti
Maria Vittoria Salvetti University of Pisa
Vassilios Theofilis
Vassilios Theofilis Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Marek Jaszczur
Marek Jaszczur AGH University of Science and Technology
Xuehua Zhang
Xuehua Zhang University of Alberta

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering opens doors to various specialized fields and career paths. Many students explore complementary online programs that enhance their technical skills and broaden professional opportunities. For example, veterans interested in transitioning to engineering roles might benefit from tailored programs like speech pathology degree online for veterans, which offer flexible learning schedules and support services.

Moreover, accelerated options such as those highlighted in accelerated speech pathology programs online provide a fast-track approach for motivated students seeking to gain credentials quickly while managing work-life balance.

Outside of engineering, understanding behavioral science can complement technical expertise. Resources on how to become an FBI behavioral analysis unit professional offer insights into combining analytical skills with psychological knowledge—valuable in fields like aerospace safety and human factors engineering.

Finally, interdisciplinary growth is encouraged by exploring diverse fields such as counseling, supported by information on different types of therapist degrees. These programs can prepare students for roles that emphasize teamwork, communication, and leadership in engineering environments.

Best Scientists Citing Johannes G.M. Kuerten

Recently Published Articles