World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
46
Citations
6820
World Ranking
18987
National Ranking
1297

Joachim Kuehr publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joachim Kuehr sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 85 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Joachim Kuehr D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joachim Kuehr sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joachim Kuehr is affiliated with the University of Freiburg in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a specific concentration on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. This specialization is reflected in their work addressing conditions related to respiratory health.

The scientist's contributions include research on Cystic Fibrosis, an inherited disorder affecting the lungs and other organs. This is evident from their involvement in studies categorized under the topic of Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances.

Kuehr's recent published work includes the paper titled "CFTR Cl− channel function in native human colon correlates with the genotype and phenotype in cystic fibrosis," published in 2021 at UNC Libraries. This publication examines the relationship between chloride channel function in the colon and genetic and phenotypic variations in cystic fibrosis patients.

Frequent collaborators in their research activities include:

  • Stephanie Hirtz
  • Tanja Gonska
  • H. H. Seydewitz
  • Jörg Thomas
  • Peter Greiner

The diverse collaboration network reflects interdisciplinary efforts to explore aspects of cystic fibrosis and associated pulmonary conditions. Their publication record is present in specialized venues such as UNC Libraries, showcasing engagement with academic outlets that focus on medical and pulmonary research.

Overall, Joachim Kuehr's professional profile centers on advancing understanding within pulmonary medicine through studies on cystic fibrosis, working with a team of frequent co-authors and contributing to scholarly literature that supports ongoing research in the field.

Best Publications

  • Efficacy of combination treatment with anti-IgE plus specific immunotherapy in polysensitized children and adolescents with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

    Joachim Kuehr;Jens Brauburger;Stefan Zielen;Uwe Schauer

  • Intrinsic defect in T cell production of interleukin (IL)-13 in the absence of both IL-5 and eotaxin precludes the development of eosinophilia and airways hyperreactivity in experimental asthma.

    Joerg Mattes;Ming Yang;Surendran Mahalingam;Joachim Kuehr

  • The polymorphisms S503P and Q576R in the interleukin-4 receptor α gene are associated with atopy and influence the signal transduction

    S Kruse;T Japha;M Tedner;SH Sparholt

  • Mite allergen exposure is a risk for the incidence of specific sensitization

    Joachim Kuehr;Thomas Frischer;Rolf Meinert;Regina Barth

  • An Mse I RFLP in the human CTLA4 promotor.

    Klaus Deichmann;Andrea Heinzmann;Elisabeth Brüggenolte;Johannes Forster

  • Linkage and allelic association of atopy and markers flanking the IL4-receptor gene.

    K. A. Deichmann;A. Heinzmann;J. Forster;S. Dischinger

  • The Ile198Thr and Ala379Val Variants of Plasmatic Paf-Acetylhydrolase Impair Catalytical Activities and Are Associated with Atopy and Asthma

    Susanne Kruse;Xiao Quan Mao;Andrea Heinzmann;Sabine Blattmann

  • NO in exhaled air is correlated with markers of eosinophilic airway inflammation in corticosteroid-dependent childhood asthma

    J. Mattes;K. Storm van′s Gravesande;U. Reining;K Alving

  • Polymorphisms in the IL 18 gene are associated with specific sensitization to common allergens and allergic rhinitis.

    Susanne Kruse;Joachim Kuehr;Michael Moseler;Matthias V. Kopp

  • Homozygosity mapping of a gene locus for primary ciliary dyskinesia on chromosome 5p and identification of the heavy dynein chain DNAH5 as a candidate gene.

    Heymut Omran;Karsten Häffner;Alexander Völkel;Joachim Kuehr

  • The co-seasonal application of anti-IgE after preseasonal specific immunotherapy decreases ocular and nasal symptom scores and rescue medication use in grass pollen allergic children.

    C Rolinck-Werninghaus;E Hamelmann;T Keil;M Kulig

  • Common polymorphisms in the coding part of the IL4-receptor gene.

    Klaus Deichmann;Jürgen Bardutzky;Johannes Forster;Andrea Heinzmann

  • CFTR Cl− channel function in native human colon correlates with the genotype and phenotype in cystic fibrosis

    Stephanie Hirtz;Tanja Gonska;Hans H. Seydewitz;Jörg Thomas

  • Modulation of Ca2+-activated Cl- secretion by basolateral K+ channels in human normal and cystic fibrosis airway epithelia.

    Marcus Mall;Tanja Gonska;Jörg Thomas;Rainer Schreiber

  • Study on the Prevention of Allergy in Children in Europe (SPACE): allergic sensitization in children at 1 year of age in a controlled trial of allergen avoidance from birth

    Gerhard Halmerbauer;Christian Gartner;Michael Schierl;Hassan Arshad

  • Infections and atopic disorders in childhood and organochlorine exposure

    Wilfried Karmaus;Joachim Kuehr;Hermann Kruse

  • Role of K(V)LQT1 in cyclic adenosine monophosphate-mediated Cl(-) secretion in human airway epithelia.

    Marcus Mall;Andreas Wissner;Rainer Schreiber;Joachim Kuehr

  • Sensitization to mite allergens is a risk factor for early and late onset of asthma and for persistence of asthmatic signs in children

    Joachim Kuehr;Thomas Frischer;Rolf Meinert;Regina Barth

  • Inhibition of amiloride-sensitive epithelial Na(+) absorption by extracellular nucleotides in human normal and cystic fibrosis airways.

    Marcus Mall;Andreas Wissner;Tanja Gonska;Detlef Calenborn

  • Effect of mite-impermeable mattress encasings and an educational package on the development of allergies in a multinational randomized, controlled birth-cohort study -- 24 months results of the Study of Prevention of Allergy in Children in Europe.

    F. Horak;S. Matthews;G. Ihorst;S. H. Arshad

Frequent Co-Authors

Wilfried Karmaus
Wilfried Karmaus University of Memphis
Michael Moseler
Michael Moseler University of Freiburg
Marcus A. Mall
Marcus A. Mall Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Joerg Mattes
Joerg Mattes University of Newcastle Australia
Karl Kunzelmann
Karl Kunzelmann University of Regensburg
Klaudiusz R. Weiss
Klaudiusz R. Weiss Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Ulrich Wahn
Ulrich Wahn Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Syed Hasan Arshad
Syed Hasan Arshad University of Southampton
Eckard Hamelmann
Eckard Hamelmann Bielefeld University
Thomas F. Wienker
Thomas F. Wienker Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Biology or Biochemistry opens doors to a variety of exciting online career pathways in healthcare and science. Students interested in the intersection of biology, health, and nutrition can explore a master degree in nutrition online, which prepares graduates for roles in clinical nutrition, wellness coaching, and public health.

For those drawn to medical imaging and diagnostics, a career as an ultrasound technician or radiology technologist is within reach through flexible online options. Accredited ultrasound tech school online programs equip students with the skills needed for entry into this growing healthcare field, while students seeking affordable routes in medical imaging should consider the cheapest radiology tech programs.

Additionally, registered dietitian and nutritionist roles continue to be in high demand, and the top dietetics masters programs provide advanced, credible training to support licensure and career progression. With so many online options, students can shape their studies to fit their ambitions and schedules.

Best Scientists Citing Joachim Kuehr