World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
31
Citations
9534
World Ranking
9556
National Ranking
4036

Jill K. Leutgeb publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jill K. Leutgeb sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 51 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jill K. Leutgeb D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jill K. Leutgeb sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Hellman Fellow

Overview

Jill K. Leutgeb is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of neuroscience, with 27 publications contributing to this area. Within neuroscience, their work focuses on several subfields including cognitive neuroscience, cellular and molecular neuroscience, neurology, cell biology, and artificial intelligence.

The central topics addressed in their research include:

  • Neuroscience and neuropharmacology research
  • Memory and neural mechanisms
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • Cellular transport and secretion
  • Cognitive science and mapping

Jill K. Leutgeb has published extensively in multiple scientific venues. Frequent publication outlets are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 6 publications
  • Nature Communications with 2 publications
  • Nature Neuroscience
  • Neuron
  • Hippocampus

Selected recent papers include:

  • Precisely timed theta oscillations are selectively required during the encoding phase of memory, 2021, Nature Neuroscience
  • Localized APP expression results in progressive network dysfunction by disorganizing spike timing, 2023, Neuron
  • Distinct roles of dentate gyrus and medial entorhinal cortex inputs for phase precession and temporal correlations in the hippocampal CA3 area, 2022, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Distinct roles of dentate gyrus and medial entorhinal cortex inputs for phase precession and temporal correlations in the hippocampal CA3 area, 2025, Nature Communications
  • Low rate hippocampal delay period activity encodes behavioral experience, 2024, Hippocampus

Jill K. Leutgeb collaborates frequently with several researchers. Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Stefan Leutgeb
  • Christian Leibold
  • Sunandha Srikanth
  • Maylin L. Fu
  • Siavash Ahmadi

Among awards, Jill K. Leutgeb is recognized as a Hellman Fellow, an honor received in 2011.

Best Publications

  • Pattern separation in the dentate gyrus and CA3 of the hippocampus.

    Jill K. Leutgeb;Stefan Leutgeb;May-Britt Moser;Edvard I. Moser

  • Independent Codes for Spatial and Episodic Memory in Hippocampal Neuronal Ensembles

    Stefan Leutgeb;Jill K. Leutgeb;Jill K. Leutgeb;Carol A. Barnes;Carol A. Barnes;Edvard I. Moser;Edvard I. Moser

  • Distinct ensemble codes in hippocampal areas CA3 and CA1.

    Stefan Leutgeb;Jill K. Leutgeb;Alessandro Treves;Alessandro Treves;May-Britt Moser

  • The Spatial Periodicity of Grid Cells Is Not Sustained During Reduced Theta Oscillations

    Julie Koenig;Ashley N. Linder;Jill K. Leutgeb;Stefan Leutgeb

  • Progressive Transformation of Hippocampal Neuronal Representations in “Morphed” Environments

    Jill K. Leutgeb;Stefan Leutgeb;Alessandro Treves;Alessandro Treves;Retsina Meyer;Retsina Meyer

  • Neuronal code for extended time in the hippocampus

    Emily A. Mankin;Fraser T. Sparks;Begum Slayyeh;Robert J. Sutherland

  • Hippocampal CA2 activity patterns change over time to a larger extent than between spatial contexts.

    Emily A. Mankin;Geoffrey W. Diehl;Fraser T. Sparks;Stefan Leutgeb

  • Pattern separation, pattern completion, and new neuronal codes within a continuous CA3 map.

    Stefan Leutgeb;Jill K. Leutgeb

  • Place cells, spatial maps and the population code for memory

    Stefan Leutgeb;Jill K Leutgeb;May-Britt Moser;Edvard I Moser

  • Medial Entorhinal Cortex Lesions Only Partially Disrupt Hippocampal Place Cells and Hippocampus- Dependent Place Memory

    Jena B. Hales;Magdalene I. Schlesiger;Jill K. Leutgeb;Larry R. Squire;Larry R. Squire

  • Grid and Nongrid Cells in Medial Entorhinal Cortex Represent Spatial Location and Environmental Features with Complementary Coding Schemes

    Geoffrey W. Diehl;Olivia J. Hon;Stefan Leutgeb;Jill K. Leutgeb

  • The medial entorhinal cortex is necessary for temporal organization of hippocampal neuronal activity

    Magdalene I Schlesiger;Christopher C Cannova;Brittney L Boublil;Jena B Hales

  • Hippocampal granule cells opt for early retirement.

    C.B. Alme;R.A. Buzzetti;D.F. Marrone;J.K. Leutgeb

  • New and distinct hippocampal place codes are generated in a new environment during septal inactivation.

    Mark P. Brandon;Julie Koenig;Jill K. Leutgeb;Stefan Leutgeb

  • Attractor-Map Versus Autoassociation Based Attractor Dynamics in the Hippocampal Network

    Laura Lee Colgin;Stefan Leutgeb;Karel Jezek;Jill K. Leutgeb

  • Neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus: carrying the message or dictating the tone

    Verónica C. Piatti;Laura A. Ewell;Jill K. Leutgeb

  • Dentate network activity is necessary for spatial working memory by supporting CA3 sharp-wave ripple generation and prospective firing of CA3 neurons.

    Takuya Sasaki;Verónica C. Piatti;Ernie Hwaun;Siavash Ahmadi

  • Impaired hippocampal rate coding after lesions of the lateral entorhinal cortex

    Li Lu;Jill K. Leutgeb;Jill K. Leutgeb;Albert Tsao;Espen J. Henriksen

  • Fast rate coding in hippocampal CA3 cell ensembles

    Stefan Leutgeb;Jill K. Leutgeb;Edvard I. Moser;May-Britt Moser

  • Hippocampal Neural Circuits Respond to Optogenetic Pacing of Theta Frequencies by Generating Accelerated Oscillation Frequencies.

    Ipshita Zutshi;Mark P. Brandon;Mark P. Brandon;Maylin L. Fu;Macayla L. Donegan

  • Spatial and memory circuits in the medial entorhinal cortex

    Takuya Sasaki;Stefan Leutgeb;Jill K Leutgeb

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefan Leutgeb
Stefan Leutgeb University of California, San Diego
Edvard I. Moser
Edvard I. Moser Norwegian University of Science and Technology
May-Britt Moser
May-Britt Moser Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Carol A. Barnes
Carol A. Barnes University of Arizona
Bruce L. McNaughton
Bruce L. McNaughton University of California, Irvine
Alessandro Treves
Alessandro Treves International School for Advanced Studies
Robert E. Clark
Robert E. Clark University of California, San Diego
John E. Lisman
John E. Lisman Brandeis University
Larry R. Squire
Larry R. Squire University of California, San Diego
Julietta Uta Frey
Julietta Uta Frey Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering Neuroscience studies, exploring related online degrees can broaden your career opportunities. Many professionals blend neuroscience knowledge with fields like psychology, mental health, and social work.

For those interested in social impact, msw online programs offer flexible paths to a career in clinical or community settings. Social work blends well with neuroscience, especially in mental health and rehabilitation contexts. If you’re seeking faster completion, accelerated online msw programs can help you earn your degree quickly without sacrificing quality.

Those passionate about behavioral analysis might consider bcba masters programs online. Specializing in applied behavior analysis, these programs open doors to roles supporting children and adults with behavioral challenges—a strong complement to neuroscience expertise.

Finally, if you're interested in foundational psychological concepts, a best online psychology degree can provide versatile skills for research, therapy, or further graduate study.

By integrating neuroscience with these related online options, you’ll find diverse and rewarding career pathways in the expanding world of brain and behavior science.

Best Scientists Citing Jill K. Leutgeb

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles