World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
35
Citations
5623
World Ranking
9164
National Ranking
3868

Lisa M. Giocomo publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa M. Giocomo sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 99 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Lisa M. Giocomo D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa M. Giocomo sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Lisa M. Giocomo is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of neuroscience. Their work spans multiple subfields including cognitive neuroscience, cellular and molecular neuroscience, neurology, sensory systems, and biophysics.

They have a significant publication record, with 128 publications focused on neuroscience. Key topics within their research include memory and neural mechanisms, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, neural dynamics and brain function, sleep and wakefulness research, photoreceptor and optogenetics research, neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms, as well as olfactory and sensory function studies.

Frequent publication outlets for their work include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Neuroscience
  • Nature Communications
  • eLife
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience

Recent notable papers include:

  • "Navigating for reward" (2021) published in Nature reviews. Neuroscience
  • "All-optical physiology resolves a synaptic basis for behavioral timescale plasticity" (2023) published in Cell
  • "A unified theory for the computational and mechanistic origins of grid cells" (2022) published in Neuron
  • "Experience-dependent contextual codes in the hippocampus" (2021) published in Nature Neuroscience
  • "Distance-tuned neurons drive specialized path integration calculations in medial entorhinal cortex" (2021) published in Cell Reports

They have collaborated frequently with a group of co-authors, including:

  • Isabel I. C. Low (11 co-authored papers)
  • Yanjun Sun (9 co-authored papers)
  • Surya Ganguli (9 co-authored papers)
  • Mark Plitt (8 co-authored papers)
  • Malcolm Campbell (7 co-authored papers)

Lisa M. Giocomo was awarded the title of Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 2013. Their research contributions provide insights into various mechanisms of brain function, particularly in memory processing and neural circuit dynamics.

Best Publications

  • Temporal Frequency of Subthreshold Oscillations Scales with Entorhinal Grid Cell Field Spacing

    Lisa M. Giocomo;Eric A. Zilli;Erik Fransén;Michael E. Hasselmo

  • A Multiplexed, Heterogeneous, and Adaptive Code for Navigation in Medial Entorhinal Cortex.

    Kiah Hardcastle;Niru Maheswaranathan;Surya Ganguli;Lisa M. Giocomo

  • Grid cell firing may arise from interference of theta frequency membrane potential oscillations in single neurons

    Michael E. Hasselmo;Lisa M. Giocomo;Eric A. Zilli

  • Environmental boundaries as an error correction mechanism for grid cells.

    Kiah Hardcastle;Surya Ganguli;Lisa M. Giocomo

  • Computational Models of Grid Cells

    Lisa M. Giocomo;May-Britt Moser;Edvard I. Moser

  • Cholinergic modulation of cortical function.

    M. E. Hasselmo;L. M. Giocomo

  • Remembered reward locations restructure entorhinal spatial maps.

    William N. Butler;Kiah Hardcastle;Lisa M. Giocomo

  • Phase precession and variable spatial scaling in a periodic attractor map model of medial entorhinal grid cells with realistic after‐spike dynamics

    Zaneta Navratilova;Lisa M. Giocomo;Lisa M. Giocomo;Jean Marc Fellous;Michael E. Hasselmo

  • Principles governing the integration of landmark and self-motion cues in entorhinal cortical codes for navigation

    Malcolm G Campbell;Samuel A Ocko;Caitlin S Mallory;Isabel I C Low

  • Grid Cells Use HCN1 Channels for Spatial Scaling

    Lisa M. Giocomo;Syed A. Hussaini;Fan Zheng;Eric R. Kandel

  • Topography of Head Direction Cells in Medial Entorhinal Cortex

    Lisa M. Giocomo;Tor Stensola;Tora Bonnevie;Tiffany Van Cauter

  • Neuromodulation by Glutamate and Acetylcholine can Change Circuit Dynamics by Regulating the Relative Influence of Afferent Input and Excitatory Feedback

    Lisa M. Giocomo;Michael E. Hasselmo

  • All-optical physiology resolves a synaptic basis for behavioral timescale plasticity

    Unknown

  • Time Constants of h Current in Layer II Stellate Cells Differ along the Dorsal to Ventral Axis of Medial Entorhinal Cortex

    Lisa M. Giocomo;Michael E. Hasselmo

  • Knock-out of HCN1 subunit flattens dorsal-ventral frequency gradient of medial entorhinal neurons in adult mice.

    Lisa M. Giocomo;Michael E. Hasselmo

  • Navigating for reward.

    Marielena Sosa;Lisa M. Giocomo

  • Cholinergic Modulation of the Resonance Properties of Stellate Cells in Layer II of Medial Entorhinal Cortex

    James G. Heys;Lisa M. Giocomo;Michael E. Hasselmo

  • Experience-dependent contextual codes in the hippocampus

    Mark H Plitt;Lisa M Giocomo

  • Computation by oscillations: implications of experimental data for theoretical models of grid cells.

    Lisa M. Giocomo;Michael E. Hasselmo

  • A positively tuned voltage indicator for extended electrical recordings in the brain

    Unknown

  • Emergent elasticity in the neural code for space.

    Samuel A. Ocko;Kiah Hardcastle;Lisa M. Giocomo;Surya Ganguli

  • Frequency of Subthreshold Oscillations at Different Membrane Potential Voltages in Neurons at Different Anatomical Positions on the Dorsoventral Axis in the Rat Medial Entorhinal Cortex

    Motoharu Yoshida;Lisa M. Giocomo;Ian Boardman;Michael E. Hasselmo

  • A unified theory for the computational and mechanistic origins of grid cells

    Ben Sorscher;Gabriel C. Mel;Samuel A. Ocko;Lisa Giocomo

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael E. Hasselmo
Michael E. Hasselmo Boston University
Surya Ganguli
Surya Ganguli Stanford University
Edvard I. Moser
Edvard I. Moser Norwegian University of Science and Technology
May-Britt Moser
May-Britt Moser Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Thomas R. Clandinin
Thomas R. Clandinin Stanford University
Bruce L. McNaughton
Bruce L. McNaughton University of California, Irvine
Peyman Golshani
Peyman Golshani University of California, Los Angeles
Shan X. Wang
Shan X. Wang Stanford University
Gang Zhang
Gang Zhang Agency for Science, Technology and Research
Nicholas A. Melosh
Nicholas A. Melosh Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in neuroscience can open doors to a range of interdisciplinary careers, especially when complemented by related fields. Many students interested in the brain and behavior also explore affordable online psychology masters programs, which delve into mental processes and clinical practice.

If you are drawn to helping families and couples, mft masters programs offer specialized training in marriage and family therapy. These programs are particularly valuable for students seeking licensure and hands-on practice in therapeutic settings.

For those at the undergraduate level, consider starting with a psychology degree. This provides a strong foundation for understanding behavioral science, which is integral to neuroscience careers.

Social work is another complementary field. If your goal involves advocacy or counseling, some universities offer 1 year msw programs online no bsw required, enabling a fast track into practice.

Exploring these related online degrees can expand your career horizons in healthcare, therapy, research, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa M. Giocomo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles