World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
50
Citations
12351
World Ranking
2718
National Ranking
1319

Jarvis T. Chen publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jarvis T. Chen sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 159 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Jarvis T. Chen D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jarvis T. Chen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jarvis T. Chen is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Social Sciences, with significant contributions to subfields such as General Health Professions, Health, Health Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Sociology and Political Science, and Oncology.

The main topics of Jarvis T. Chen's work include:

  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Climate Change and Health Impacts

They have coauthored extensively with other researchers, most frequently collaborating with Nancy Krieger, Christian Testa, Pamela D. Waterman, Brent A. Coull, and Sari L. Reisner.

Jarvis T. Chen has published in several venues multiple times. These include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • American Journal of Epidemiology
  • SLEEP
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Revealing the Unequal Burden of COVID-19 by Income, Race/Ethnicity, and Household Crowding: US County Versus Zip Code Analyses," 2020, Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
  • "Variation in racial/ethnic disparities in COVID-19 mortality by age in the United States: A cross-sectional study," 2020, PLoS Medicine
  • "Correction: Variation in racial/ethnic disparities in COVID-19 mortality by age in the United States: A cross-sectional study," 2021, PLoS Medicine
  • "Cancer Stage at Diagnosis, Historical Redlining, and Current Neighborhood Characteristics: Breast, Cervical, Lung, and Colorectal Cancers, Massachusetts, 2001-2015," 2020, American Journal of Epidemiology
  • "Excess mortality in men and women in Massachusetts during the COVID-19 pandemic," 2020, The Lancet

Best Publications

  • Geocoding and Monitoring of US Socioeconomic Inequalities in Mortality and Cancer Incidence: Does the Choice of Area-based Measure and Geographic Level Matter? The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project

    Nancy Krieger;Jarvis T. Chen;Pamela D. Waterman;Mah-Jabeen Soobader

  • Race/Ethnicity, Gender, and Monitoring Socioeconomic Gradients in Health: A Comparison of Area-Based Socioeconomic Measures—The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project

    Nancy Krieger;Jarvis T. Chen;Pamela D. Waterman;David H. Rehkopf

  • Choosing area based socioeconomic measures to monitor social inequalities in low birth weight and childhood lead poisoning: The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project (US)

    Krieger N;Chen Jt;Waterman Pd;Soobader Mj

  • Painting a truer picture of US socioeconomic and racial/ethnic health inequalities: the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project.

    Nancy Krieger;Jarvis T. Chen;Pamela D. Waterman;David H. Rehkopf

  • Revealing the Unequal Burden of COVID-19 by Income, Race/Ethnicity, and Household Crowding: US County Versus Zip Code Analyses

    Jarvis T. Chen;Nancy Krieger

  • Zip Code Caveat: Bias Due to Spatiotemporal Mismatches Between Zip Codes and US Census–Defined Geographic Areas—The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project

    Nancy Krieger;Pamela Waterman;Jarvis T. Chen;Mah-Jabeen Soobader

  • Monitoring socioeconomic inequalities in sexually transmitted infections, tuberculosis, and violence: geocoding and choice of area-based socioeconomic measures--the public health disparities geocoding project (US)

    Nancy Krieger;Pamela D. Waterman;Jarvis T. Chen;Mah-Jabeen Soobader

  • The Fall and Rise of US Inequities in Premature Mortality: 1960–2002

    Nancy Krieger;David H Rehkopf;Jarvis T Chen;Pamela D Waterman

  • Comparing Individual- and Area-based Socioeconomic Measures for the Surveillance of Health Disparities: A Multilevel Analysis of Massachusetts Births, 1989–1991

    S. V. Subramanian;J. T. Chen;D. H. Rehkopf;P. D. Waterman

  • Racial Discrimination, Psychological Distress, and Self-Rated Health Among US-Born and Foreign-Born Black Americans

    Nancy Krieger;Anna A. Kosheleva;Pamela D. Waterman;Jarvis T. Chen

  • Racial Disparities in Context: A Multilevel Analysis of Neighborhood Variations in Poverty and Excess Mortality Among Black Populations in Massachusetts

    S.V. Subramanian;Jarvis T. Chen;David H. Rehkopf;Pamela D. Waterman

  • Correction: Variation in racial/ethnic disparities in COVID-19 mortality by age in the United States: A cross-sectional study

    Mary T. Bassett;Jarvis T. Chen;Nancy Krieger

  • Survival Disparities in Indigenous and Non-Indigenous New Zealanders with Colon Cancer: The Role of Patient Comorbidity, Treatment and Health Service Factors

    Sarah Hill;Diana Sarfati;Tony Blakely;Bridget Robson

  • Cancer Stage at Diagnosis, Historical Redlining, and Current Neighborhood Characteristics: Breast, Cervical, Lung, and Colorectal Cancers, Massachusetts, 2001-2015.

    Nancy Krieger;Emily Wright;Jarvis T Chen;Pamela D Waterman

  • The inverse hazard law: blood pressure, sexual harassment, racial discrimination, workplace abuse and occupational exposures in US low-income black, white and Latino workers.

    Nancy Krieger;Jarvis T. Chen;Pamela D. Waterman;Cathy Hartman

  • Local residential segregation matters: stronger association of census tract compared to conventional city-level measures with fatal and non-fatal assaults (total and firearm related), using the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE) for Racial, Economic, and Racialized Economic Segregation, Massachusetts (US), 1995-2010

    Nancy Krieger;Justin M. Feldman;Pamela D. Waterman;Jarvis T. Chen

  • The Unique Impact of Abolition of Jim Crow Laws on Reducing Inequities in Infant Death Rates and Implications for Choice of Comparison Groups in Analyzing Societal Determinants of Health

    Nancy Krieger;Jarvis T. Chen;Brent A. Coull;Pamela D. Waterman

  • Police Killings and Police Deaths Are Public Health Data and Can Be Counted

    Nancy Krieger;Jarvis T. Chen;Pamela D. Waterman;Mathew V. Kiang

  • Integrating Multiple Social Statuses in Health Disparities Research: The Case of Lung Cancer

    David R. Williams;Emily Z. Kontos;K. Viswanath;Jennifer S. Haas

  • Exposing racial discrimination: implicit & explicit measures--the My Body, My Story study of 1005 US-born black & white community health center members.

    Nancy Krieger;Pamela D. Waterman;Anna Kosheleva;Jarvis T. Chen

  • Mapping and Measuring Social Disparities in Premature Mortality: The Impact of Census Tract Poverty within and Across Boston Neighborhoods, 1999–2001

    J T Chen;D H Rehkopf;P D Waterman;S V Subramanian

Frequent Co-Authors

Nancy Krieger
Nancy Krieger Harvard University
Pamela D. Waterman
Pamela D. Waterman Harvard University
Brent A. Coull
Brent A. Coull Harvard University
Jason Beckfield
Jason Beckfield Harvard University
David H. Rehkopf
David H. Rehkopf Stanford University
S. V. Subramanian
S. V. Subramanian Harvard University
Sofia Gruskin
Sofia Gruskin University of Southern California
M. Maria Glymour
M. Maria Glymour Boston University
Susan Redline
Susan Redline Brigham and Women's Hospital
William P. Hanage
William P. Hanage Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring social sciences and humanities opens doors to diverse career options in counseling, psychology, and social work. Many students are choosing flexible study paths with online degrees in these fields, which offer accredited programs that meet industry standards and lead to meaningful professional roles.

If you're interested in counseling, you can consider cacrep accredited programs online that prepare you for licensure and a range of counseling careers. For those focused on helping couples and families, marriage and family therapy master's programs provide specialized training for impactful work in clinical settings.

Psychology remains one of the most popular choices, and finding a cheapest online psychology degree can make entering the field more accessible. Additionally, earning a Master of Social Work is a practical path for many aspiring professionals, especially with many msw online options designed for flexible entry and learning.

Pursuing these online degrees can help you achieve your career goals in social services, mental health, education, and community outreach, all while balancing current life commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Jarvis T. Chen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles