World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 43 4423 4088 176 166 153 7797

Jany Rademakers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jany Rademakers between 1996 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jany Rademakers published across 31 years, from 1996 to 2026, averaging 6.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2013. 9 of the 189 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2013. 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 8 publications 2026: 1 publication
1996 2026

189 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jany Rademakers: publications per year, 1996 to 2026
Year Publications
1996 2
1997 1
1998 0
1999 1
2000 1
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 4
2006 2
2007 3
2008 12
2009 6
2010 8
2011 10
2012 9
2013 16
2014 11
2015 14
2016 5
2017 5
2018 14
2019 6
2020 15
2021 15
2022 12
2023 3
2024 5
2025 8
2026 1
Total 189
Download as CSV

Jany Rademakers publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jany Rademakers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 144–153 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 153 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407 153
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Jany Rademakers D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jany Rademakers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300 43
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Jany Rademakers is affiliated with the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research in Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of Health Professions and Medicine, with notable subfields including General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Family Practice, Sociology and Political Science, and Epidemiology.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics centered around health literacy, communication in healthcare, and patient involvement. Key topics in their research portfolio include:

  • Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Diabetes Management and Education

Among the recent papers authored by Jany Rademakers are:

  • Towards a comprehensive, person-centred assessment of health literacy: translation, cultural adaptation and psychometric test of the Dutch Health Literacy Questionnaire, 2020, BMC Public Health
  • Communication and shared decision-making with patients with limited health literacy; helpful strategies, barriers and suggestions for improvement reported by hospital-based palliative care providers, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • The importance of health literacy for self-management: A scoping review of reviews, 2021, Chronic Illness
  • Patient and Public Involvement of young people with a chronic condition in projects in health and social care: A scoping review, 2020, Health Expectations
  • Challenges and solutions in communication with patients with low health literacy: Perspectives of healthcare providers, 2022, PLoS ONE

Jany Rademakers has published frequently in several academic journals, including:

  • PLoS ONE
  • Health Expectations
  • Patient Education and Counseling
  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • Chronic Illness

Collaboration is a notable aspect of their research activity, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Monique Heijmans
  • F. van Schelven
  • Polina Putrik
  • Annelies Boonen
  • Trudy van der Weijden

Best Publications

  • The relationship between health, education, and health literacy: results from the Dutch adult literacy and life skills survey.

    Iris van der Heide;Jen Wang;Mariël Droomers;Peter Spreeuwenberg

  • Determinants of patient choice of healthcare providers: a scoping review.

    Aafke Victoor;Diana M J Delnoij;Roland D Friele;Jany J D J M Rademakers

  • Functional, communicative and critical health literacy of chronic disease patients and their importance for self-management

    Monique Heijmans;Geeke Waverijn;Jany Rademakers;Rosalie van der Vaart

  • Determinants of the intention to use e-Health by community dwelling older people

    Anke J E de Veer;José M Peeters;Anne E M Brabers;Francois G Schellevis

  • Evidence on the effectiveness of health literacy interventions in the EU : a systematic review

    Boudewijn B. Visscher;Bas Steunenberg;Monique Heijmans;Jolien M. Hofstede

  • The role of health literacy in explaining the association between educational attainment and the use of out-of-hours primary care services in chronically ill people: a survey study

    Tessa Jansen;Jany Rademakers;Geeke Waverijn;Robert Verheij

  • Measuring patient activation in The Netherlands: translation and validation of the American short form Patient Activation Measure (PAM13).

    Jany Rademakers;Jessica Nijman;Lucas van der Hoek;Monique Heijmans

  • Health literacy of Dutch adults: a cross sectional survey

    Iris van der Heide;Jany Rademakers;Maarten Schipper;Mariël Droomers

  • Structure, process or outcome: which contributes most to patients' overall assessment of healthcare quality?

    Jany Rademakers;Diana Delnoij;Dolf de Boer

  • The Net Promoter Score--an asset to patient experience surveys?

    Maarten W. Krol;Dolf de Boer;Diana M. Delnoij;Jany J. D. J. M. Rademakers

  • Associations Among Health Literacy, Diabetes Knowledge, and Self-Management Behavior in Adults with Diabetes: Results of a Dutch Cross-Sectional Study

    Iris van der Heide;Ellen Uiters;Jany Rademakers;Jeroen N Struijs

  • What role does health literacy play in patients' involvement in medical decision-making?

    Anne E. M. Brabers;Jany J. D. J. M. Rademakers;Peter P. Groenewegen;Liset van Dijk

  • Relationships between patient activation, disease-specific knowledge and health outcomes among people with diabetes; a survey study

    Michelle Hendriks;Jany Rademakers

  • The Dutch Consumer Quality Index: an example of stakeholder involvement in indicator development

    Diana M J Delnoij;Jany J D J M Rademakers;Peter P Groenewegen

  • Patient activation and health literacy as predictors of health information use in a general sample of Dutch health care consumers.

    Jessica Nijman;Michelle Hendriks;Anne Brabers;Judith de Jong

  • A comparison of a postal survey and mixed-mode survey using a questionnaire on patients’ experiences with breast care

    Marloes Zuidgeest;Michelle Hendriks;Laura Koopman;Peter Spreeuwenberg

  • Participation of chronic patients in medical consultations: patients' perceived efficacy, barriers and interest in support

    Inge Henselmans;Monique Heijmans;Jany Rademakers;Sandra van Dulmen;Sandra van Dulmen

  • The importance of patient-centered care for various patient groups.

    Dolf de Boer;Diana Delnoij;Jany Rademakers

  • The importance of health literacy for self-management: A scoping review of reviews.

    Marieke van der Gaag;Monique Heijmans;Cristina Spoiala;Jany Rademakers

  • Communication and shared decision-making with patients with limited health literacy; helpful strategies, barriers and suggestions for improvement reported by hospital-based palliative care providers

    Ruud Roodbeen;Astrid Vreke;Gudule Boland;Jany Rademakers

  • How do healthcare consumers process and evaluate comparative healthcare information? A qualitative study using cognitive interviews

    Olga C Damman;Michelle Hendriks;Jany Rademakers;Diana M J Delnoij

  • Diversity in sexual health: Problems and dilemmas

    J. Rademakers;I. Mouthaan;M. de Neef

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter P. Groenewegen
Peter P. Groenewegen Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research
Richard H. Osborne
Richard H. Osborne Swinburne University of Technology
Olle ten Cate
Olle ten Cate Utrecht University
Rachelle Buchbinder
Rachelle Buchbinder Monash University
Annelies Boonen
Annelies Boonen Maastricht University Medical Centre
Sanne Kruikemeier
Sanne Kruikemeier University of Amsterdam
Caroline A. Baan
Caroline A. Baan Tilburg University
Onyebuchi A. Arah
Onyebuchi A. Arah University of California, Los Angeles
Karien Stronks
Karien Stronks University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens a range of online degree and career options. For those interested in mental health and human behavior, pursuing an online degree in psychology is a flexible way to begin a rewarding career. These programs often allow for part-time study and can lead to roles in counseling, research, education, and more.

If your interest lies in social work, there are several msw online programs available that prepare students for impactful careers in community service, healthcare, and advocacy. These degrees can be especially valuable for students seeking to balance work, study, and family commitments.

For those aiming for advanced clinical practice or leadership, a part time psyd program offers the flexibility to train as a psychologist while managing other responsibilities. Similarly, pursuing a career in marriage and family therapy is possible through online mft programs, designed for those who want to make a difference in family and relationship dynamics.

These online options make it easier to align your studies with your career goals and personal schedule, expanding access to a fulfilling career in social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Jany Rademakers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles