World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
26
Citations
4956
World Ranking
1501
National Ranking
750

Janelle Wong publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janelle Wong sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 62 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Janelle Wong D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janelle Wong sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 26 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Janelle Wong is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their research primarily spans social sciences with a strong focus on the intersection of sociology and political science, political science and international relations, cultural studies, communication, and education.

Their work extensively covers topics such as racial and ethnic identity research, electoral systems and political participation, migration, refugees, and integration, critical race theory in education, migration and labor dynamics, Asian American and Pacific histories, and migration, ethnicity, and economy.

Recent publications by Janelle Wong include the following:

  • Asian Americans and the Politics of the Twenty-First Century (2023), published in Annual Review of Political Science
  • Convergence Across Difference: Understanding the Political Ties That Bind with the 2016 National Asian American Survey (2021), published in RSF The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
  • Between Empirical Data and Anti-Blackness: A Critical Perspective on Anti-Asian Hate Crimes and Hate Incidents (2022), published in Journal of Asian American Studies

Some of the notable frequent coauthors working alongside Janelle Wong include:

  • S. Karthick Ramakrishnan
  • Rossina Zamora Liu
  • Nadia E. Brown
  • Fernando Tormos-Aponte
  • Sono Shah

They have contributed multiple publications to various academic venues, with frequent publications appearing in:

  • Amerasia Journal
  • PS Political Science & Politics
  • Harvard Dataverse
  • Annual Review of Political Science
  • RSF The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Janelle Wong's research often addresses themes related to racial and ethnic identity and political participation among Asian American communities. Their interdisciplinary approach bridges political science and cultural studies to explore group interests and social dynamics within minority populations.

Best Publications

  • Intergroup Prejudice in Multiethnic Settings

    J. Eric Oliver;Janelle Wong

  • Defended Neighborhoods, Integration, and Racially Motivated Crime

    Donald P. Green;Dara Z. Strolovitch;Janelle S. Wong

  • Intergroup Prejudice in Multiethnic Settings

    Unknown

  • The Politics of Asian Americans: Diversity and Community

    Pei-te Lien;M. Margaret Conway;Janelle Wong

  • Asian American Political Participation: Emerging Constituents and Their Political Identities

    Janelle Wong;S. Karthick Ramakrishnan;Taeku Lee;Jane Junn

  • THE EFFECTS OF AGE AND POLITICAL EXPOSURE ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF PARTY IDENTIFICATION AMONG ASIAN AMERICAN AND LATINO IMMIGRANTS IN THE UNITED STATES

    Janelle S. Wong

  • Group-Based Resources and Political Participation among Asian Americans

    Janelle S. Wong;Pei-Te Lien;M. Margaret Conway

  • Asian Pacific-American Public Opinion and Political Participation

    Pei-te Lien;Christian Collet;Janelle Wong;S. Karthick Ramakrishnan

  • Immigrants, Evangelicals, and Politics in an Era of Demographic Change

    Janelle S. Wong

  • Mobilizing Asian American Voters: A Field Experiment

    Janelle S. Wong

  • A possessive investment in white heteropatriarchy? The 2016 election and the politics of race, gender, and sexuality

    Dara Z. Strolovitch;Janelle S. Wong;Andrew Proctor

  • Political Socialisation in Immigrant Families: Challenging Top-Down Parental Socialisation Models

    Janelle Wong;Vivian Tseng

  • The Contours and Sources of Ethnic Identity Choices Among Asian Americans

    Pei-te Lien;M. Margaret Conway;Janelle Wong

  • Immigration and Civic Participation in a Multiracial and Multiethnic Context1

    Michael A. Stoll;Janelle S. Wong

  • Best practices in collecting online data with Asian, Black, Latino, and White respondents: evidence from the 2016 Collaborative Multiracial Post-election Survey

    Matt A. Barreto;Lorrie Frasure-Yokley;Edward D. Vargas;Janelle Wong

  • Measuring Gay Populations and Antigay Hate Crime

    Donald P. Green;Dara Z. Strolovitch;Janelle S. Wong;Robert W. Bailey

  • Tolerance and the Contact Hypothesis: A Field Experiment

    Donald P. Green;Janelle S. Wong

  • The Role of Born-Again Identity on the Political Attitudes of Whites, Blacks, Latinos, and Asian Americans

    Unknown

  • TWO STEPS FORWARD

    Janelle Wong

  • Asian American Political Participation

    Janelle Wong;S. Karthick Ramakrishnan;Taeku Lee;Jane Junn

  • Accurately Counting Asian Americans Is a Civil Rights Issue

    Jennifer Lee;Karthick Ramakrishnan;Janelle Wong

  • Democracy's promise

    Janelle Wong

  • RACE-BASED CONSIDERATIONS AND THE OBAMA VOTE

    S. Karthick Ramakrishnan;Janelle Wong;Taeku Lee;Jane Junn

  • New Race Politics in America: Activity amid Diversity: Asian American Political Participation

    Janelle S. Wong;Pei-te Lien;M. Margaret Conway

  • The Contours and Sources of Ethnic Identity Choices Among Asian

    Pei-te Lien;M. Margaret Conway;Janelle Wong

  • The Pilot Asian American Political Survey: Summary Report

    Tae-ku Lee;Pei-te Lien;M. M Conway;Janelle Wong

Frequent Co-Authors

S. Karthick Ramakrishnan
S. Karthick Ramakrishnan University of California, Riverside
Donald P. Green
Donald P. Green Columbia University
Matt A. Barreto
Matt A. Barreto University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science in the USA opens doors to a wide array of related online degree programs that can broaden your career options. For those interested in research, archives, or public policy, considering top library science programs can be an excellent way to combine political knowledge with information management skills.

Historical context often shapes political decision-making, making degrees for history a relevant complement to political science studies. Pairing these fields strengthens analytical and critical thinking abilities that are highly valued in government and education careers.

Students wanting a multi-disciplinary education may explore interdisciplinary studies degree programs. These flexible programs allow you to tailor your coursework to combine politics, economics, communication, and more—preparing you for diverse roles in business, policy, or non-profits.

Ready to advance your expertise? Consider online graduate history programs. Graduate study can lead to higher-level opportunities in research, teaching, public service, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Janelle Wong

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles