World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 36 9040 8353 207 192 144 4837

Jan Novy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jan Novy between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jan Novy published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2015. 19 of the 164 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2015. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 11 publications
2003 2025

164 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jan Novy: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 0
2005 0
2006 1
2007 3
2008 5
2009 6
2010 8
2011 5
2012 9
2013 4
2014 9
2015 13
2016 12
2017 11
2018 11
2019 9
2020 10
2021 10
2022 9
2023 9
2024 8
2025 11
Total 164
Download as CSV

Jan Novy publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Novy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 138–147 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 144 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456 144
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Jan Novy D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Novy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435 36
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Jan Novy is affiliated with the University of Lausanne in Switzerland and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a particular focus on subfields such as psychiatry and mental health, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, emergency medicine, neurology, and epidemiology.

Their research primarily covers topics including epilepsy research and treatment, pharmacological effects and toxicity studies, cardiac arrest and resuscitation, traumatic brain injury research, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, and intensive care unit cognitive disorders.

The scientist has published multiple papers in well-known medical journals. Recent publications include:

  • Continuous vs Routine Electroencephalogram in Critically Ill Adults With Altered Consciousness and No Recent Seizure (2020, JAMA Neurology)
  • Prediction of regaining consciousness despite an early epileptiform EEG after cardiac arrest (2020, Neurology)
  • Cardiac phenotype in ATP1A3-related syndromes (2020, Neurology)
  • Added value of somato-sensory evoked potentials amplitude for prognostication after cardiac arrest (2020, Resuscitation)
  • Multimodal Prediction of Favorable Outcome After Cardiac Arrest: A Cohort Study (2023, Critical Care Medicine)

Jan Novy frequently publishes in journals such as:

  • Resuscitation (7 publications)
  • Revue Médicale Suisse (6 publications)
  • Epilepsia (5 publications)
  • Clinical Neurophysiology (5 publications)
  • Acta Neurologica Scandinavica (4 publications)

Their collaborative efforts include work with frequent co-authors such as:

  • Andrea O. Rossetti (48 joint publications)
  • Vincent Alvarez (14 joint publications)
  • Stephan Rüegg (13 joint publications)
  • Kaspar Schindler (11 joint publications)
  • Isabelle Beuchat (11 joint publications)

Best Publications

  • Spinal cord ischemia: clinical and imaging patterns, pathogenesis, and outcomes in 27 patients.

    Jan Novy;Alain Carruzzo;Philippe Maeder;Julien Bogousslavsky

  • Refractory status epilepticus: a prospective observational study.

    Jan Novy;Giancarlo Logroscino;Andrea O. Rossetti

  • Epilepsy, hippocampal sclerosis and febrile seizures linked by common genetic variation around SCN1A

    Dalia Kasperavičiūtė;Claudia B. Catarino;Claudia B. Catarino;Mar Matarin;Costin Leu

  • Status epilepticus: impact of therapeutic coma on outcome.

    Nicola A. Marchi;Jan Novy;Mohamed Faouzi;Christine Stähli

  • Electroencephalography Predicts Poor and Good Outcomes after Cardiac Arrest: A Two-Center Study

    Andrea O. Rossetti;Diego F. Tovar Quiroga;Elsa Juan;Jan Novy

  • Continuous vs Routine Electroencephalogram in Critically Ill Adults With Altered Consciousness and No Recent Seizure: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

    Andrea O Rossetti;Kaspar Schindler;Raoul Sutter;Stephan Rüegg

  • Refractory and super‐refractory status epilepticus in adults: a 9‐year cohort study

    L. Delaj;J. Novy;P. Ryvlin;N. A. Marchi

  • Practice variability and efficacy of clonazepam, lorazepam, and midazolam in status epilepticus: A multicenter comparison

    Vincent Alvarez;Jong Woo Lee;Frank W. Drislane;M. Brandon Westover

  • Early prediction of coma recovery after cardiac arrest with blinded pupillometry

    Daria Solari;Andrea O. Rossetti;Laurent Carteron;John-Paul Miroz

  • Status epilepticus of inflammatory etiology: a cohort study.

    Marianna Spatola;Jan Novy;Renaud Du Pasquier;Josep Dalmau

  • Lacosamide neurotoxicity associated with concomitant use of sodium channel-blocking antiepileptic drugs: a pharmacodynamic interaction?

    Jan Novy;Philip N. Patsalos;Josemir W. Sander;Sanjay M. Sisodiya

  • Levetiracetam and pregabalin for antiepileptic monotherapy in patients with primary brain tumors. A phase II randomized study

    Andrea O. Rossetti;Sandrine Jeckelmann;Jan Novy;Patrick Roth

  • EEG reactivity to pain in comatose patients: Importance of the stimulus type.

    Spyridoula Tsetsou;Jan Novy;Mauro Oddo;Andrea O. Rossetti

  • The lifelong course of chronic epilepsy: the Chalfont experience

    Jan Novy;Marco Belluzzo;Luís Otávio Caboclo;Luís Otávio Caboclo;Claudia B. Catarino

  • Increased prevalence of ECG markers for sudden cardiac arrest in refractory epilepsy

    R J Lamberts;M T Blom;J Novy;M Belluzzo

  • Cause of death and predictors of mortality in a community-based cohort of people with epilepsy.

    Mark R. Keezer;Gail S. Bell;Aidan Neligan;Jan Novy

  • A coupled hydrodynamic model of the cardiovascular and cerebrospinal fluid system

    Bryn Andrew Martin;Philippe Reymond;Jan Novy;Olivier Balédent

  • Genome-wide Polygenic Burden of Rare Deleterious Variants in Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy.

    Costin Leu;Simona Balestrini;Simona Balestrini;Bridget Maher;Bridget Maher;Laura Hernández-Hernández;Laura Hernández-Hernández

  • Therapeutic coma for status epilepticus: Differing practices in a prospective multicenter study.

    Vincent Alvarez;Jong Woo Lee;M. Brandon Westover;Frank W. Drislane

  • Pregabalin in patients with primary brain tumors and seizures: a preliminary observation.

    Jan Novy;Roger Stupp;Andrea O. Rossetti

  • Sudden cardiac death is associated both with epilepsy and with use of antiepileptic drugs

    Prisca R Bauer;Jan Novy;Mark R Keezer;Gail S Bell

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrea O. Rossetti
Andrea O. Rossetti University of Lausanne
Josemir W. Sander
Josemir W. Sander University College London
Mauro Oddo
Mauro Oddo University of Lausanne
Sanjay M. Sisodiya
Sanjay M. Sisodiya University College London
Gail S. Bell
Gail S. Bell University College London
Ingrid E. Scheffer
Ingrid E. Scheffer University of Melbourne
Laurent A. Decosterd
Laurent A. Decosterd University Hospital of Lausanne
Serge Vulliemoz
Serge Vulliemoz University of Geneva
Kaspar Schindler
Kaspar Schindler University of Bern
Thierry Buclin
Thierry Buclin University of Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re intrigued by the brain, behavior, and mental health but not sure whether a Neuroscience degree is right for you, there are many related fields to consider. Many students choose flexible online degrees to launch careers in counseling, psychology, or therapy.

For those interested in direct client care, a most affordable online masters in mental health counseling can be a step toward becoming a licensed professional counselor. You can also look into earning an online counseling degree for broader opportunities in schools, community settings, or private practice.

If you are passionate about supporting families and couples, accredited mft programs (Marriage and Family Therapy) offer a focused pathway. Alternatively, an online masters psychology degree can open doors to roles in counseling, human resources, research, or marketing.

Exploring these online options allows students to build skills relevant to neuroscience while enjoying greater flexibility and affordability.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Novy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles