World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
43
Citations
9820
World Ranking
1689
National Ranking
54

Jan C. Aurich publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan C. Aurich sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 524 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Jan C. Aurich D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan C. Aurich sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Ultra-precision grinding

    E. Brinksmeier;Y. Mutlugünes;F. Klocke;J.C. Aurich

  • Advances in Modeling and Simulation of Grinding Processes

    E. Brinksmeier;J.C. Aurich;E. Govekar;C. Heinzel

  • Burrs—Analysis, control and removal

    J.C. Aurich;D. Dornfeld;P.J. Arrazola;V. Franke

  • How to design and offer services successfully

    J.C. Aurich;C. Mannweiler;E. Schweitzer

  • An Approach to Life Cycle Oriented Technical Service Design

    J.C. Aurich;C. Fuchs;M.F. DeVries

  • High-performance dry grinding using a grinding wheel with a defined grain pattern

    Unknown

  • Configuration of product‐service systems

    J.C. Aurich;N. Wolf;M. Siener;E. Schweitzer

  • Micro grinding tool for manufacture of complex structures in brittle materials

    Unknown

  • Analysis of Control Architectures in the Context of Industry 4.0

    Hermann Meissner;Rebecca Ilsen;Jan C. Aurich

  • Manufacture and application of ultra-small micro end mills

    Unknown

  • Development of a Superabrasive Grinding Wheel With Defined Grain Structure Using Kinematic Simulation

    Unknown

  • Modeling and implementation of a digital twin of material flows based on physics simulation

    Moritz Glatt;Chantal Sinnwell;Li Yi;Sean Donohoe

  • Sustainability of abrasive processes

    J.C. Aurich;B. Linke;Michael Zwicky Hauschild;M. Carrella

  • Selective laser melting (SLM) of AISI 316L—impact of laser power, layer thickness, and hatch spacing on roughness, density, and microhardness at constant input energy density

    Unknown

  • 3D Finite Element Modelling of Segmented Chip Formation

    Unknown

  • Modelling and simulation of process: machine interaction in grinding

    Jan C. Aurich;Dirk Biermann;Heribert Blum;Christian Brecher

  • Kinematic simulation of high-performance grinding for analysis of chip parameters of single grains

    Unknown

  • An Investigation of the Microstructure and Fatigue Behavior of Additively Manufactured AISI 316L Stainless Steel with Regard to the Influence of Heat Treatment

    Unknown

  • Effect of cutting edge preparation of coated tools on their performance in milling various materials

    K.D. Bouzakis;K.D. Bouzakis;E. Bouzakis;E. Bouzakis;S. Kombogiannis;S. Kombogiannis;S. Makrimallakis;S. Makrimallakis

  • Continuous improvement of industrial product-service systems

    E. Schweitzer;J.C. Aurich

Frequent Co-Authors

Ralf Müller
Ralf Müller BI Norwegian Business School
Paul Steinmann
Paul Steinmann University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Bernd Hamann
Bernd Hamann University of California, Davis
Stefan Schindler
Stefan Schindler Umweltbundesamt, Austria
Hans Hasse
Hans Hasse Technical University of Kaiserslautern
Hans Hagen
Hans Hagen Technical University of Kaiserslautern
Bahram Ravani
Bahram Ravani University of California, Davis
Fritz Klocke
Fritz Klocke RWTH Aachen University
Hans Kurt Tönshoff
Hans Kurt Tönshoff University of Hannover
Berend Denkena
Berend Denkena University of Hannover

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering can broaden your career opportunities. Programs often vary in their competitiveness, so it's important to research acceptance rates before applying. For example, understanding the slp grad school acceptance rate can offer insights into program selectivity, a factor relevant across many engineering and technical disciplines.

If you’re considering alternative but related fields, some degrees might be easier to enter than others. Checking out some of the easiest slp masters programs to get into can help identify less competitive yet valuable pathways that align with your skills and interests.

Cost also plays a critical role in choosing an online program. Understanding how much does an online speech pathology degree cost provides a framework for budgeting, which is just as important in engineering education. Tuition and fees can vary widely depending on the institution and program format.

Lastly, veterans can find supportive options tailored to their unique needs. Discovering best military friendly online speech pathology degrees offers ideas on programs that provide flexibility, scholarships, and resources that veterans may also seek in engineering-focused degrees.

Best Scientists Citing Jan C. Aurich

Recently Published Articles