World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 43 1689 1564 54 51 524 9820

Jan C. Aurich publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jan C. Aurich between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jan C. Aurich published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 20.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 69 publications in 2023. 78 of the 669 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 69. Peak 69 publications in 2023. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 40 publications 2015: 33 publications 2016: 35 publications 2017: 47 publications 2018: 40 publications 2019: 57 publications 2020: 36 publications 2021: 65 publications 2022: 40 publications 2023: 69 publications 2024: 43 publications 2025: 35 publications
1994 2025

669 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jan C. Aurich: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 0
1996 2
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 2
2003 8
2004 5
2005 5
2006 7
2007 8
2008 9
2009 12
2010 17
2011 9
2012 21
2013 23
2014 40
2015 33
2016 35
2017 47
2018 40
2019 57
2020 36
2021 65
2022 40
2023 69
2024 43
2025 35
Total 669
Download as CSV

Jan C. Aurich publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan C. Aurich sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 517–526 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 524 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21 524
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Jan C. Aurich D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan C. Aurich sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101 43
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Ultra-precision grinding

    E. Brinksmeier;Y. Mutlugünes;F. Klocke;J.C. Aurich

  • Advances in Modeling and Simulation of Grinding Processes

    E. Brinksmeier;J.C. Aurich;E. Govekar;C. Heinzel

  • Burrs—Analysis, control and removal

    J.C. Aurich;D. Dornfeld;P.J. Arrazola;V. Franke

  • How to design and offer services successfully

    J.C. Aurich;C. Mannweiler;E. Schweitzer

  • An Approach to Life Cycle Oriented Technical Service Design

    J.C. Aurich;C. Fuchs;M.F. DeVries

  • High-performance dry grinding using a grinding wheel with a defined grain pattern

    Unknown

  • Configuration of product‐service systems

    J.C. Aurich;N. Wolf;M. Siener;E. Schweitzer

  • Micro grinding tool for manufacture of complex structures in brittle materials

    Unknown

  • Analysis of Control Architectures in the Context of Industry 4.0

    Hermann Meissner;Rebecca Ilsen;Jan C. Aurich

  • Manufacture and application of ultra-small micro end mills

    Unknown

  • Development of a Superabrasive Grinding Wheel With Defined Grain Structure Using Kinematic Simulation

    Unknown

  • Modeling and implementation of a digital twin of material flows based on physics simulation

    Moritz Glatt;Chantal Sinnwell;Li Yi;Sean Donohoe

  • Sustainability of abrasive processes

    J.C. Aurich;B. Linke;Michael Zwicky Hauschild;M. Carrella

  • Selective laser melting (SLM) of AISI 316L—impact of laser power, layer thickness, and hatch spacing on roughness, density, and microhardness at constant input energy density

    Unknown

  • 3D Finite Element Modelling of Segmented Chip Formation

    Unknown

  • Modelling and simulation of process: machine interaction in grinding

    Jan C. Aurich;Dirk Biermann;Heribert Blum;Christian Brecher

  • Kinematic simulation of high-performance grinding for analysis of chip parameters of single grains

    Unknown

  • An Investigation of the Microstructure and Fatigue Behavior of Additively Manufactured AISI 316L Stainless Steel with Regard to the Influence of Heat Treatment

    Unknown

  • Effect of cutting edge preparation of coated tools on their performance in milling various materials

    K.D. Bouzakis;K.D. Bouzakis;E. Bouzakis;E. Bouzakis;S. Kombogiannis;S. Kombogiannis;S. Makrimallakis;S. Makrimallakis

  • Continuous improvement of industrial product-service systems

    E. Schweitzer;J.C. Aurich

Frequent Co-Authors

Ralf Müller
Ralf Müller BI Norwegian Business School
Paul Steinmann
Paul Steinmann University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Bernd Hamann
Bernd Hamann University of California, Davis
Stefan Schindler
Stefan Schindler Umweltbundesamt, Austria
Hans Hasse
Hans Hasse Technical University of Kaiserslautern
Hans Hagen
Hans Hagen Technical University of Kaiserslautern
Bahram Ravani
Bahram Ravani University of California, Davis
Fritz Klocke
Fritz Klocke RWTH Aachen University
Hans Kurt Tönshoff
Hans Kurt Tönshoff University of Hannover
Berend Denkena
Berend Denkena University of Hannover

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering can broaden your career opportunities. Programs often vary in their competitiveness, so it's important to research acceptance rates before applying. For example, understanding the slp grad school acceptance rate can offer insights into program selectivity, a factor relevant across many engineering and technical disciplines.

If you’re considering alternative but related fields, some degrees might be easier to enter than others. Checking out some of the easiest slp masters programs to get into can help identify less competitive yet valuable pathways that align with your skills and interests.

Cost also plays a critical role in choosing an online program. Understanding how much does an online speech pathology degree cost provides a framework for budgeting, which is just as important in engineering education. Tuition and fees can vary widely depending on the institution and program format.

Lastly, veterans can find supportive options tailored to their unique needs. Discovering best military friendly online speech pathology degrees offers ideas on programs that provide flexibility, scholarships, and resources that veterans may also seek in engineering-focused degrees.

Best Scientists Citing Jan C. Aurich

Recently Published Articles