World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Paulo Roberto de Aguiar

Paulo Roberto de Aguiar

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 35 9081 8744 35 34 262 3826

Paulo Roberto de Aguiar publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paulo Roberto de Aguiar between 1997 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paulo Roberto de Aguiar published across 30 years, from 1997 to 2026, averaging 10 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2015. 8 of the 299 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2015. 1997: 4 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 29 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 28 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 7 publications 2026: 1 publication
1997 2026

299 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paulo Roberto de Aguiar: publications per year, 1997 to 2026
Year Publications
1997 4
1998 1
1999 3
2000 2
2001 5
2002 6
2003 10
2004 6
2005 4
2006 6
2007 5
2008 10
2009 6
2010 16
2011 12
2012 6
2013 13
2014 6
2015 29
2016 9
2017 12
2018 22
2019 28
2020 27
2021 17
2022 7
2023 6
2024 13
2025 7
2026 1
Total 299
Download as CSV

Paulo Roberto de Aguiar publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paulo Roberto de Aguiar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 258–267 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 262 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240 262
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Paulo Roberto de Aguiar D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paulo Roberto de Aguiar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262 35
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Paulo Roberto de Aguiar is affiliated with Sao Paulo State University in Brazil and has a significant body of research within engineering, with a focus on mechanical engineering, electrical and electronic engineering, biomedical engineering, mechanics of materials, and civil and structural engineering.

The following main fields of study characterize their work:

  • Engineering

More detailed subfields within these areas include:

  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Civil and Structural Engineering

The primary topics of Paulo Roberto de Aguiar's research and publications focus on advanced manufacturing and machining processes, with special attention to the following themes:

  • Advanced machining processes and optimization
  • Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques
  • Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
  • Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
  • Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
  • Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

Paulo Roberto de Aguiar has contributed numerous papers to several established publication venues. The most frequent platforms for their work include:

  • The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
  • IEEE Sensors Journal
  • Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Tribology International
  • Procedia CIRP

Recent notable publications include:

  • "Grinding performance of bearing steel using MQL under different dilutions and wheel cleaning for green manufacture", 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production
  • "Application of hybrid eco-friendly MQL+WCJ technique in AISI 4340 steel grinding for cleaner and greener production", 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production
  • "Toward sustainable grinding using minimum quantity lubrication technique with diluted oil and simultaneous wheel cleaning", 2020, Tribology International
  • "Grinding hardened steel using MQL associated with cleaning system and cBN wheel", 2020, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
  • "Improvement in the grinding process using the MQL technique with cooled wheel cleaning jet", 2020, Tribology International

Their research collaboration network includes frequent coauthors such as:

  • Eduardo Carlos Bianchi
  • José Cláudio Lopes
  • Luiz Eduardo de Ângelo Sanchez
  • Fernando Sabino Fonteque Ribeiro
  • Hamilton José de Mello

Their contributions emphasize the development of advanced machining and grinding methods, focusing on sustainable manufacturing practices and surface treatment optimization. These efforts align with topics such as minimizing environmental impact and improving machining efficiency through technological innovation.

Best Publications

  • Analysis of surface integrity for minimum quantity lubricant—MQL in grinding

    Leonardo Roberto da Silva;Eduardo Carlos Bianchi;Ronaldo Yoshinobu Fusse;Rodrigo Eduardo Catai

  • Study on the behavior of the minimum quantity lubricant - MQL technique under different lubricating and cooling conditions when grinding ABNT 4340 steel

    L. R. Silva;E. C. Bianchi;R. E. Catai;R. Y. Fusse

  • Improving minimum quantity lubrication in CBN grinding using compressed air wheel cleaning

    Danilo de Jesus Oliveira;Luiz Gustavo Guermandi;Eduardo Carlos Bianchi;Anselmo Eduardo Diniz

  • Tool Condition Monitoring of Single-Point Dresser Using Acoustic Emission and Neural Networks Models

    Cesar H. R. Martins;Paulo R. Aguiar;Arminio Frech;Eduardo Carlos Bianchi

  • Evaluation of neural models applied to the estimation of tool wear in the grinding of advanced ceramics

    Mauricio Eiji Nakai;Paulo Roberto Aguiar;Hildo Guillardi;Eduardo Carlos Bianchi

  • Tool condition monitoring of aluminum oxide grinding wheel using AE and fuzzy model

    Felipe Aparecido Alexandre;Wenderson Nascimento Lopes;Fábio R. Lofrano Dotto;Fábio Isaac Ferreira

  • Evaluation of grinding process using simultaneously MQL technique and cleaning jet on grinding wheel surface

    Rafael Lemes Rodriguez;José Claudio Lopes;Rodolfo Alexandre Hildebrandt;Ricardo Rozo Vaz Perez

  • Tool condition monitoring of aluminum oxide grinding wheel in dressing operation using acoustic emission and neural networks

    D. F. G. Moia;I. H. Thomazella;P. R. Aguiar;E. C. Bianchi

  • Plunge cylindrical grinding with the minimum quantity lubrication coolant technique assisted with wheel cleaning system

    Eduardo Carlos Bianchi;Rafael Lemes Rodriguez;Rodolfo Alexandre Hildebrandt;José Claudio Lopes

  • Minimum quantity of lubrication (MQL) as an eco-friendly alternative to the cutting fluids in advanced ceramics grinding

    R. L. Javaroni;J. C. Lopes;B. K. Sato;L. E. A. Sanchez

  • Grinding performance of bearing steel using MQL under different dilutions and wheel cleaning for green manufacture

    Mateus Vinicius Garcia;José Claudio Lopes;Anselmo Eduardo Diniz;Alessandro Roger Rodrigues

  • Evaluating the effect of the compressed air wheel cleaning in grinding the AISI 4340 steel with CBN and MQL with water

    Eduardo Carlos Bianchi;Bruno Kenta Sato;Alan Rodrigo Sales;José Claudio Lopes

  • Digital signal processing for self-vibration monitoring in grinding: A new approach based on the time-frequency analysis of vibration signals

    Rogério Thomazella;Wenderson Nascimento Lopes;Paulo Roberto Aguiar;Felipe Aparecido Alexandre

  • Analysis of the different forms of application and types of cutting fluid used in plunge cylindrical grinding using conventional and superabrasive CBN grinding wheels

    Rodrigo Daun Monici;Eduardo Carlos Bianchi;Rodrigo Eduardo Catai;Paulo Roberto de Aguiar

  • Performance of SAE 52100 steel grinding using MQL technique with pure and diluted oil

    Douglas Lyra de Moraes;Mateus Vinicius Garcia;José Claudio Lopes;Fernando Sabino Fonteque Ribeiro

  • Application of MQL technique using TiO2 nanoparticles compared to MQL simultaneous to the grinding wheel cleaning jet

    José Claudio Lopes;Mateus Vinicius Garcia;Roberta Silveira Volpato;Hamilton José de Mello

  • Grinding performance using variants of the MQL technique: MQL with cooled air and MQL simultaneous to the wheel cleaning jet

    José Claudio Lopes;Mateus Vinicius Garcia;Matheus Valentim;Rafael Liberatti Javaroni

  • Behavior of hardened steel grinding using MQL under cold air and MQL CBN wheel cleaning

    José Claudio Lopes;Kamira Miksa Fragoso;Mateus Vinicius Garcia;Fernando Sabino Fonteque Ribeiro

  • Application of a wheel cleaning system during grinding of alumina with minimum quantity lubrication

    José C. Lopes;Carlos E. H. Ventura;Lucas de M. Fernandes;André B. Tavares

  • Comparative analysis of two CBN grinding wheels performance in nodular cast iron plunge grinding

    Lucas de Martini Fernandes;José Claudio Lopes;Roberta Silveira Volpato;Anselmo Eduardo Diniz

  • Application of hybrid eco-friendly MQL+WCJ technique in AISI 4340 steel grinding for cleaner and greener production

    Rafael Lemes Rodriguez;José Claudio Lopes;Mateus Vinicius Garcia;Fernando Sabino Fonteque Ribeiro

  • Piezoelectric Transducers Assessed by the Pencil Lead Break for Impedance-Based Structural Health Monitoring

    Vinicius Augusto Daré de Almeida;Fabricio Guimarães Baptista;Paulo Roberto de Aguiar

  • Application of the auxiliary wheel cleaning jet in the plunge cylindrical grinding with Minimum Quantity Lubrication technique under various flow rates

    Eduardo C Bianchi;Rafael L Rodriguez;Rodolfo A Hildebrandt;José C Lopes

  • Effect of CBN grain friability in hardened steel plunge grinding

    José Claudio Lopes;Lucas de Martini Fernandes;Bruno Biondo Domingues;Rubens Chinali Canarim

  • Spectra Measurements Using Piezoelectric Diaphragms to Detect Burn in Grinding Process

    Danilo M. S. Ribeiro;Paulo R. Aguiar;Luiz F. G. Fabiano;Doriana M. D'Addona

  • Comparative analysis of two CBN grinding wheels performance in nodular cast iron plunge grinding

    Lucas de Martini Fernandes;José Claudio Lopes;Roberta Silveira Volpato;Paulo Aguiar

Frequent Co-Authors

Eduardo Carlos Bianchi
Eduardo Carlos Bianchi Sao Paulo State University
Anselmo Eduardo Diniz
Anselmo Eduardo Diniz State University of Campinas
Roberto Teti
Roberto Teti University of Naples Federico II
Álisson Rocha Machado
Álisson Rocha Machado Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná
Mozammel Mia
Mozammel Mia BRAC University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing a pathway in engineering or technology opens many possibilities, including advancing your qualifications through online programs. For those interested in leadership and process optimization within tech-driven industries, consider an mba in operations management. This degree focuses on efficient systems management, supply chain logistics, and organizational efficiency — key in today’s global market.

If you are looking to stay flexible in your education, some online mba no gmat programs waive standard test requirements, making it easier for professionals to enroll without the stress of additional exams. Budget is also a critical issue; exploring an mba under 30k can help you find reputable programs that don’t break the bank.

Technology professionals may also wish to diversify their career options with a social media marketing degree. As digital presence grows increasingly important in engineering and tech sectors, this qualification can add valuable skills in branding, outreach, and digital strategy.

Best Scientists Citing Paulo Roberto de Aguiar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles