World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Jakob Heyman publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jakob Heyman sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Jakob Heyman D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jakob Heyman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jakob Heyman is affiliated with the University of Gothenburg in Sweden and has contributed to research primarily in the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science. Their body of work focuses on topics related to geology and paleoclimatology, landslides and related hazards, and cryospheric studies and observations. They have also published on methane hydrates and related phenomena, seismic imaging and inversion techniques, geophysical methods and applications, and geological formations and processes.

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including Arjen P. Stroeven, Bradley W. Goodfellow, Jens-Öve Näslund, April S. Dalton, and Helen E. Dulfer. These collaborations have contributed to a variety of studies across different subfields and topics.

Heyman's recent papers include the following:

  • Deglaciation of the north American ice sheet complex in calendar years based on a comprehensive database of chronological data: NADI-1 (2023, Quaternary Science Reviews)
  • The extreme yet transient nature of glacial erosion (2022, Nature Communications)
  • Present-Day Stress Field Influences Bedrock Fracture Openness Deep Into the Subsurface (2020, Geophysical Research Letters)
  • Glacial ripping: geomorphological evidence from Sweden for a new process of glacial erosion (2020, Geografiska Annaler Series A Physical Geography)
  • OCTOPUS database (v.2) (2022, Earth system science data)

Their frequent publication venues include Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America, Quaternary Science Reviews, Nature Communications, and Geophysical Research Letters.

Their research spans several subfields of study, such as atmospheric science, management, monitoring, policy and law, environmental chemistry, geophysics, and ocean engineering. This interdisciplinary scope reflects an engagement with complex environmental and geological processes at various scales.

Best Publications

  • Deglaciation of Fennoscandia

    Arjen P. Stroeven;Clas Hättestrand;Johan Kleman;Jakob Heyman

  • Too young or too old: Evaluating cosmogenic exposure dating based on an analysis of compiled boulder exposure ages

    Jakob Heyman;Arjen P. Stroeven;Jonathan M. Harbor;Marc W. Caffee

  • Deglaciation of the Eurasian ice sheet complex.

    Henry Patton;Alun Lloyd Hubbard;Karin Andreassen;Amandine Auriac

  • On the reconstruction of palaeo-ice sheets: Recent advances and future challenges

    Chris R. Stokes;Lev Tarasov;Robin Blomdin;Robin Blomdin;Thomas M. Cronin

  • Paleoglaciation of the Tibetan Plateau and surrounding mountains based on exposure ages and ELA depression estimates

    Jakob Heyman

  • Boulder height - exposure age relationships from a global glacial Be-10 compilation

    Jakob Heyman;Patrick J. Applegate;Robin Blomdin;Natacha Gribenski

  • Palaeoglaciology of Bayan Har Shan, NE Tibetan Plateau: exposure ages reveal a missing LGM expansion

    Jakob Heyman;Jakob Heyman;Arjen P. Stroeven;Marc W. Caffee;Clas Hättestrand

  • A new Scandinavian reference Be-10 production rate

    Arjen P. Stroeven;Jakob Heyman;Derek Fabel;Svante Björck

  • Evaluating the timing of former glacier expansions in the Tian Shan : A key step towards robust spatial correlations

    Robin Blomdin;Robin Blomdin;Arjen P. Stroeven;Jonathan M. Harbor;Jonathan M. Harbor;Nathaniel A. Lifton

  • Paleoglaciation of Shaluli Shan, southeastern Tibetan Plateau

    Ping Fu;Ping Fu;Arjen P. Stroeven;Jonathan M. Harbor;Clas Hättestrand

  • Cordilleran Ice Sheet mass loss preceded climate reversals near the Pleistocene Termination

    Brian Menounos;Brent M. Goehring;G. Osborn;Martin Margold

  • Glacial geomorphology of the Altai and Western Sayan Mountains, Central Asia

    Robin Blomdin;Jakob Heyman;Arjen P. Stroeven;Clas Hättestrand

  • Deglaciation of the north American ice sheet complex in calendar years based on a comprehensive database of chronological data: NADI-1

    Unknown

  • Paleo-climate of the central European uplands during the last glacial maximum based on glacier mass-balance modeling

    Barbara M. Heyman;Jakob Heyman;Thomas Fickert;Jonathan M. Harbor

  • The extreme yet transient nature of glacial erosion

    Unknown

  • Glacial geomorphology of the Bayan Har sector of the NE Tibetan Plateau

    Jakob Heyman;Clas Hättestrand;Arjen P Stroeven

  • Landscape analysis of the Huang He headwaters, NE Tibetan Plateau — Patterns of glacial and fluvial erosion

    Arjen Stroeven;Clas Hättestrand;Jakob Heyman;Jon Harbor

  • Glacial geomorphology and paleoglaciation patterns in Shaluli Shan, the southeastern Tibetan Plateau — Evidence for polythermal ice cap glaciation

    Ping Fu;Jonathan M. Harbor;Arjen P. Stroeven;Clas Hättestrand

  • Timing and dynamics of glaciation in the Ikh Turgen Mountains, Altai region, High Asia

    Robin Blomdin;Arjen P. Stroeven;Jonathan M. Harbor;Jonathan M. Harbor;Natacha Gribenski;Natacha Gribenski

  • Glacial geomorphology of the Shaluli Shan area, southeastern Tibetan Plateau

    Ping Fu;Jakob Heyman;Clas Hättestrand;Arjen P. Stroeven

  • Glacial geomorphology of the Tian Shan

    Arjen P. Stroeven;Clas Hättestrand;Jakob Heyman;Johan Kleman

  • Inner gorges cut by subglacial meltwater during Fennoscandian ice sheet decay

    John D. Jansen;A. T. Codilean;Arjen P. Stroeven;D. Fabel

  • Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology

    Jakob Heyman

Frequent Co-Authors

Arjen P. Stroeven
Arjen P. Stroeven Stockholm University
Clas Hättestrand
Clas Hättestrand Stockholm University
Marc W. Caffee
Marc W. Caffee Purdue University West Lafayette
Jon Harbor
Jon Harbor Purdue University West Lafayette
Nathaniel A. Lifton
Nathaniel A. Lifton Purdue University West Lafayette
Liping Zhou
Liping Zhou Peking University
Krister N. Jansson
Krister N. Jansson Stockholm University
Alun Hubbard
Alun Hubbard University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway
Adrian M. Hall
Adrian M. Hall University of Edinburgh
John D. Jansen
John D. Jansen Czech Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA opens doors to various related online degrees that can complement and enhance your career prospects. For those interested in creative fields alongside science, an mfa online program offers flexibility and affordability. This interdisciplinary approach can lead to unique roles in environmental communication and education.

Additionally, management skills are valuable in Earth Science careers that involve project coordination or organizational leadership. Pursuing a masters degree in human resource management online can prepare graduates to oversee teams and manage resources effectively within scientific institutions.

Online education is also increasingly accessible for diverse age groups, including mature students. Many institutions offer flexibility tailored to the needs of older learners, with some of the best degrees for older adults designed to support lifelong learning and career transitions in Earth Science and related fields.

For those interested in library sciences or information management related to geosciences, enrolling in an ala-accredited program offers a reputable path to becoming a skilled resource manager in scientific libraries and data centers.

Best Scientists Citing Jakob Heyman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles