World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 36 7144 6608 731 676 300 5870

Cédric M. John publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cédric M. John between 1953 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cédric M. John published across 73 years, from 1953 to 2025, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2021. 30 of the 339 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1953 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2021. 1953: 1 publication 1954: 0 publications 1955: 0 publications 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 1 publication 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 19 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 12 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 38 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 17 publications
1953 2025

339 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cédric M. John: publications per year, 1953 to 2025
Year Publications
1953 1
1954 0
1955 0
1956 0
1957 0
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 1
1969 0
1970 0
1971 1
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 0
1990 2
1991 0
1992 2
1993 0
1994 2
1995 0
1996 0
1997 2
1998 7
1999 1
2000 1
2001 1
2002 2
2003 3
2004 4
2005 19
2006 11
2007 7
2008 9
2009 3
2010 6
2011 1
2012 12
2013 10
2014 12
2015 20
2016 23
2017 27
2018 17
2019 18
2020 24
2021 38
2022 12
2023 9
2024 13
2025 17
Total 339
Download as CSV

Cédric M. John publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cédric M. John sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 298–307 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 300 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120 300
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Cédric M. John D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cédric M. John sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389 36
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Cédric M. John is affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans several interconnected fields and topics within Earth and Planetary Sciences and Engineering. Their primary subfields of study include Geophysics, Environmental Chemistry, Geology, Ocean Engineering, and Mechanics of Materials.

The scientist's research interests cover a wide array of topics, including:

  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Geological and Geophysical Studies
  • Hydrocarbon Exploration and Reservoir Analysis
  • Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
  • Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research

Cédric M. John has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Brandon Dugan, P. B. Flemings, Jan H. Behrmann, Gerardo J. Iturrino, and Yasutaka Aizawa. These collaborations reflect sustained research partnerships across related disciplines.

Their noteworthy recent publications illustrate the range and focus of their work, including:

  • InterCarb: A Community Effort to Improve Interlaboratory Standardization of the Carbonate Clumped Isotope Thermometer Using Carbonate Standards, 2021, Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems
  • A Unified Clumped Isotope Thermometer Calibration (0.5-1,100°C) Using Carbonate-Based Standardization, 2021, Geophysical Research Letters
  • Impact of dataset size and convolutional neural network architecture on transfer learning for carbonate rock classification, 2022, Computers & Geosciences
  • Fluid Surface Coverage Showing the Controls of Rock Mineralogy on the Wetting State, 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • Anaerobic oxidation of methane by Mn oxides in sulfate-poor environments, 2021, Geology

Cédric M. John has published extensively in several venues, with the highest number of publications appearing in Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). Other frequent publication outlets include Marine and Petroleum Geology, SSRN Electronic Journal, Geology, and Minerals.

The scope of their scholarly work engages significant aspects of geological and environmental research, often intersecting with technical and engineering methodologies. This breadth is reflected by the diversity of both topics and publication venues, suggesting an interdisciplinary approach within their areas of expertise.

Best Publications

  • Environmental precursors to rapid light carbon injection at the Palaeocene/Eocene boundary

    Appy Sluijs;Henk Brinkhuis;Stefan Schouten;Steven M. Bohaty

  • North American continental margin records of the Paleocene‐Eocene thermal maximum: Implications for global carbon and hydrological cycling

    Cédric M. John;Steven M. Bohaty;James C. Zachos;Appy Sluijs

  • A Unified Clumped Isotope Thermometer Calibration (0.5–1,100°C) Using Carbonate-Based Standardization

    Noah Anderson;J R Kelson;S Kele;M Daëron

  • Temperature dependence of oxygen- and clumped isotope fractionation in carbonates: A study of travertines and tufas in the 6-95 °C temperature range

    Sándor Kele;Sándor Kele;Sebastian F.M. Breitenbach;Sebastian F.M. Breitenbach;Enrico Capezzuoli;A. Nele Meckler

  • Eustatic variations during the Paleocene-Eocene greenhouse world

    Appy Sluijs;Henk Brinkhuis;Erica M. Crouch;Cédric M. John;Cédric M. John

  • Effects of Improved 17O Correction on Interlaboratory Agreement in Clumped Isotope Calibrations, Estimates of Mineral-Specific Offsets, and Temperature Dependence of Acid Digestion Fractionation

    S. V. Petersen;W. F. Defliese;W. F. Defliese;C. Saenger;M. Daëron

  • Laboratory calibration of the calcium carbonate clumped isotope thermometer in the 25–250°C temperature range

    Tobias Kluge;Cédric M. John;Anne-Lise Jourdan;Simon Davis

  • The magnesium isotope (δ26Mg) signature of dolomites

    Anna Geske;Robert H. Goldstein;Vasileios Mavromatis;Detlev K. Richter

  • Timing and magnitude of Miocene eustasy derived from the mixed siliciclastic-carbonate stratigraphic record of the northeastern Australian margin

    Cédric M. John;Garry D. Karner;Emily Browning;R. Mark Leckie

  • The Palaeocene-Eocene carbon isotope excursion: constraints from individual shell planktonic foraminifer records

    James C Zachos;Steven M Bohaty;Cedric M John;Heather McCarren

  • Pore pressure penetrometers document high overpressure near the seafloor where multiple submarine landslides have occurred on the continental slope, offshore Louisiana, Gulf of Mexico

    P. B. Flemings;H. Long;B. Dugan;J. Germaine

  • Impact of dataset size and convolutional neural network architecture on transfer learning for carbonate rock classification

    Unknown

  • Time-capsule concretions: Unlocking burial diagenetic processes in the Mancos Shale using carbonate clumped isotopes

    Annabel Dale;Cédric M. John;Peter S. Mozley;P. C. Smalley

  • Mixed carbonate-siliciclastic record on the North African margin (Malta)—coupling of weathering processes and mid Miocene climate

    Cédric M. John;Maria Mutti;Thierry Adatte

  • Phosphogenesis and organic-carbon preservation in the Miocene Monterey Formation at Naples Beach, California—The Monterey hypothesis revisited

    Karl B. Föllmi;Christophe Badertscher;Eric de Kaenel;Peter Stille

  • δ18O and Marion Plateau backstripping: Combining two approaches to constrain late middle Miocene eustatic amplitude

    Cédric M. John;Garry D. Karner;Maria Mutti

  • Clay assemblage and oxygen isotopic constraints on the weathering response to the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum, east coast of North America

    Cédric M. John;Neil R. Banerjee;Fred J. Longstaffe;Cheyenne Sica

  • Assessing and calibrating the ATR-FTIR approach as a carbonate rock characterization tool

    Delano G. Henry;Jonathan S. Watson;Cédric M. John

  • Late Miocene climate and time scale reconciliation: Accurate orbital calibration from a deep-sea perspective

    Anna Joy Drury;Thomas Westerhold;Thomas Frederichs;Jun Tian

  • Erratum to "Pore pressure penetrometers document high overpressure near the seafloor where multiple submarine landslides have occurred on the continental slope, offshore Louisiana, Gulf of Mexico" (Earth and Planetary Science Letters 269/3-4 (2008) 309-32)

    P. B. Flemings;H. Long;B. Dugan;J. Germaine

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan H. Behrmann
Jan H. Behrmann GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel
Peter B. Flemings
Peter B. Flemings The University of Texas at Austin
Thomas Westerhold
Thomas Westerhold University of Bremen
Mitchell W Lyle
Mitchell W Lyle Oregon State University
Roy H Wilkens
Roy H Wilkens University of Hawaiʻi Sea Grant
Jun Tian
Jun Tian Tongji University
Gary J. Hampson
Gary J. Hampson Imperial College London
Jaume Vergés
Jaume Vergés Spanish National Research Council
Thierry Adatte
Thierry Adatte University of Lausanne
James C. Zachos
James C. Zachos University of California, Santa Cruz

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science often opens doors to diverse academic programs and career options. For those interested in complementary skills, a bachelors in photography online can enhance opportunities in environmental documentation and geospatial analysis through visual storytelling.

Veterans considering further education can find specialized support through online photography degrees for veterans, providing flexible schedules and military-friendly resources to build a career where Earth Science meets digital media.

Language skills are also valuable in global Earth Science fields. Pursuing affordable and efficient language studies can be achieved through the spanish degrees online, which offer pathways to careers in environmental policy, research, and international collaboration.

For military-affiliated students, best military friendly online spanish degrees ensure that learning is accessible and aligned with veteran benefits, enriching communication abilities essential for diverse Earth Science roles.

Best Scientists Citing Cédric M. John

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles