World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
36
Citations
5870
World Ranking
7144
National Ranking
731

Cédric M. John publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cédric M. John sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 300 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Cédric M. John D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cédric M. John sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Cédric M. John is affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans several interconnected fields and topics within Earth and Planetary Sciences and Engineering. Their primary subfields of study include Geophysics, Environmental Chemistry, Geology, Ocean Engineering, and Mechanics of Materials.

The scientist's research interests cover a wide array of topics, including:

  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Geological and Geophysical Studies
  • Hydrocarbon Exploration and Reservoir Analysis
  • Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
  • Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research

Cédric M. John has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Brandon Dugan, P. B. Flemings, Jan H. Behrmann, Gerardo J. Iturrino, and Yasutaka Aizawa. These collaborations reflect sustained research partnerships across related disciplines.

Their noteworthy recent publications illustrate the range and focus of their work, including:

  • InterCarb: A Community Effort to Improve Interlaboratory Standardization of the Carbonate Clumped Isotope Thermometer Using Carbonate Standards, 2021, Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems
  • A Unified Clumped Isotope Thermometer Calibration (0.5-1,100°C) Using Carbonate-Based Standardization, 2021, Geophysical Research Letters
  • Impact of dataset size and convolutional neural network architecture on transfer learning for carbonate rock classification, 2022, Computers & Geosciences
  • Fluid Surface Coverage Showing the Controls of Rock Mineralogy on the Wetting State, 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • Anaerobic oxidation of methane by Mn oxides in sulfate-poor environments, 2021, Geology

Cédric M. John has published extensively in several venues, with the highest number of publications appearing in Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). Other frequent publication outlets include Marine and Petroleum Geology, SSRN Electronic Journal, Geology, and Minerals.

The scope of their scholarly work engages significant aspects of geological and environmental research, often intersecting with technical and engineering methodologies. This breadth is reflected by the diversity of both topics and publication venues, suggesting an interdisciplinary approach within their areas of expertise.

Best Publications

  • Environmental precursors to rapid light carbon injection at the Palaeocene/Eocene boundary

    Appy Sluijs;Henk Brinkhuis;Stefan Schouten;Steven M. Bohaty

  • InterCarb: A Community Effort to Improve Interlaboratory Standardization of the Carbonate Clumped Isotope Thermometer Using Carbonate Standards.

    S. M. Bernasconi;M. Daëron;K. D. Bergmann;M. Bonifacie

  • North American continental margin records of the Paleocene‐Eocene thermal maximum: Implications for global carbon and hydrological cycling

    Cédric M. John;Steven M. Bohaty;James C. Zachos;Appy Sluijs

  • A Unified Clumped Isotope Thermometer Calibration (0.5–1,100°C) Using Carbonate-Based Standardization

    Noah Anderson;J R Kelson;S Kele;M Daëron

  • Temperature dependence of oxygen- and clumped isotope fractionation in carbonates: A study of travertines and tufas in the 6-95 °C temperature range

    Sándor Kele;Sándor Kele;Sebastian F.M. Breitenbach;Sebastian F.M. Breitenbach;Enrico Capezzuoli;A. Nele Meckler

  • Eustatic variations during the Paleocene-Eocene greenhouse world

    Appy Sluijs;Henk Brinkhuis;Erica M. Crouch;Cédric M. John;Cédric M. John

  • Effects of Improved 17O Correction on Interlaboratory Agreement in Clumped Isotope Calibrations, Estimates of Mineral-Specific Offsets, and Temperature Dependence of Acid Digestion Fractionation

    S. V. Petersen;W. F. Defliese;W. F. Defliese;C. Saenger;M. Daëron

  • Laboratory calibration of the calcium carbonate clumped isotope thermometer in the 25–250°C temperature range

    Tobias Kluge;Cédric M. John;Anne-Lise Jourdan;Simon Davis

  • The magnesium isotope (δ26Mg) signature of dolomites

    Anna Geske;Robert H. Goldstein;Vasileios Mavromatis;Detlev K. Richter

  • Timing and magnitude of Miocene eustasy derived from the mixed siliciclastic-carbonate stratigraphic record of the northeastern Australian margin

    Cédric M. John;Garry D. Karner;Emily Browning;R. Mark Leckie

  • The Palaeocene-Eocene carbon isotope excursion: constraints from individual shell planktonic foraminifer records

    James C Zachos;Steven M Bohaty;Cedric M John;Heather McCarren

  • Pore pressure penetrometers document high overpressure near the seafloor where multiple submarine landslides have occurred on the continental slope, offshore Louisiana, Gulf of Mexico

    P. B. Flemings;H. Long;B. Dugan;J. Germaine

  • Impact of dataset size and convolutional neural network architecture on transfer learning for carbonate rock classification

    Unknown

  • Time-capsule concretions: Unlocking burial diagenetic processes in the Mancos Shale using carbonate clumped isotopes

    Annabel Dale;Cédric M. John;Peter S. Mozley;P. C. Smalley

  • Mixed carbonate-siliciclastic record on the North African margin (Malta)—coupling of weathering processes and mid Miocene climate

    Cédric M. John;Maria Mutti;Thierry Adatte

  • Phosphogenesis and organic-carbon preservation in the Miocene Monterey Formation at Naples Beach, California—The Monterey hypothesis revisited

    Karl B. Föllmi;Christophe Badertscher;Eric de Kaenel;Peter Stille

  • δ18O and Marion Plateau backstripping: Combining two approaches to constrain late middle Miocene eustatic amplitude

    Cédric M. John;Garry D. Karner;Maria Mutti

  • Clay assemblage and oxygen isotopic constraints on the weathering response to the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum, east coast of North America

    Cédric M. John;Neil R. Banerjee;Fred J. Longstaffe;Cheyenne Sica

  • Assessing and calibrating the ATR-FTIR approach as a carbonate rock characterization tool

    Delano G. Henry;Jonathan S. Watson;Cédric M. John

  • Late Miocene climate and time scale reconciliation: Accurate orbital calibration from a deep-sea perspective

    Anna Joy Drury;Thomas Westerhold;Thomas Frederichs;Jun Tian

  • Erratum to "Pore pressure penetrometers document high overpressure near the seafloor where multiple submarine landslides have occurred on the continental slope, offshore Louisiana, Gulf of Mexico" (Earth and Planetary Science Letters 269/3-4 (2008) 309-32)

    P. B. Flemings;H. Long;B. Dugan;J. Germaine

  • The Sensitivity of Estimates of Multiphase Fluid and Solid Properties of Porous Rocks to Image Processing

    Gaetano Garfi;Cédric M. John;Steffen Berg;Steffen Berg;Samuel Krevor

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan H. Behrmann
Jan H. Behrmann GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel
Peter B. Flemings
Peter B. Flemings The University of Texas at Austin
Thomas Westerhold
Thomas Westerhold University of Bremen
Mitchell W Lyle
Mitchell W Lyle Oregon State University
Roy H Wilkens
Roy H Wilkens University of Hawaiʻi Sea Grant
Jun Tian
Jun Tian Tongji University
Gary J. Hampson
Gary J. Hampson Imperial College London
Jaume Vergés
Jaume Vergés Spanish National Research Council
Thierry Adatte
Thierry Adatte University of Lausanne
James C. Zachos
James C. Zachos University of California, Santa Cruz

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science often opens doors to diverse academic programs and career options. For those interested in complementary skills, a bachelors in photography online can enhance opportunities in environmental documentation and geospatial analysis through visual storytelling.

Veterans considering further education can find specialized support through online photography degrees for veterans, providing flexible schedules and military-friendly resources to build a career where Earth Science meets digital media.

Language skills are also valuable in global Earth Science fields. Pursuing affordable and efficient language studies can be achieved through the spanish degrees online, which offer pathways to careers in environmental policy, research, and international collaboration.

For military-affiliated students, best military friendly online spanish degrees ensure that learning is accessible and aligned with veteran benefits, enriching communication abilities essential for diverse Earth Science roles.

Best Scientists Citing Cédric M. John

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles