World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 30 3431 3225 19 19 147 2843

Jacek Smolka publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jacek Smolka between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jacek Smolka published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2016. 14 of the 162 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2016. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 7 publications
2001 2025

162 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jacek Smolka: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 1
2003 2
2004 1
2005 0
2006 1
2007 3
2008 5
2009 3
2010 9
2011 6
2012 0
2013 7
2014 5
2015 5
2016 20
2017 14
2018 16
2019 7
2020 12
2021 12
2022 10
2023 8
2024 7
2025 7
Total 162
Download as CSV

Jacek Smolka publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacek Smolka sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 147–156 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 147 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155 147
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Jacek Smolka D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacek Smolka sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83 30
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • A computational model of a transcritical R744 ejector based on a homogeneous real fluid approach

    Jacek Smolka;Zbigniew Bulinski;Adam Fic;Andrzej J. Nowak

  • CFD-based shape optimisation of a CO2 two-phase ejector mixing section

    Michal Palacz;Jacek Smolka;Waclaw Kus;Adam Fic

  • Experimental analysis of the R744 vapour compression rack equipped with the multi-ejector expansion work recovery module

    Michal Haida;Krzysztof Banasiak;Jacek Smolka;Armin Hafner

  • A CFD-based investigation of the energy performance of two-phase R744 ejectors to recover the expansion work in refrigeration systems: An irreversibility analysis

    Krzysztof Banasiak;Michał Palacz;Armin Hafner;Zbigniew Buliński

  • Application range of the HEM approach for CO2 expansion inside two-phase ejectors for supermarket refrigeration systems

    Michal Palacz;Jacek Smolka;Adam Fic;Zbigniew Bulinski

  • Investigation on the CPU nanofluid cooling

    Unknown

  • Shape optimisation of a two-phase ejector for CO2 refrigeration systems

    Michal Palacz;Jacek Smolka;Andrzej J. Nowak;Krzysztof Banasiak

  • Experimental validation of the coupled fluid flow, heat transfer and electromagnetic numerical model of the medium-power dry-type electrical transformer

    Unknown

  • HEM and HRM accuracy comparison for the simulation of CO2 expansion in two-phase ejectors for supermarket refrigeration systems

    Michal Palacz;Michal Haida;Jacek Smolka;Andrzej J. Nowak

  • Modified homogeneous relaxation model for the r744 trans-critical flow in a two-phase ejector

    Michal Haida;Jacek Smolka;Armin Hafner;Michal Palacz

  • Improved 3-D temperature uniformity in a laboratory drying oven based on experimentally validated CFD computations.

    Unknown

  • CFD-based 3-D optimization of the mutual coil configuration for the effective cooling of an electrical transformer

    Unknown

  • Full-scale multi-ejector module for a carbon dioxide supermarket refrigeration system: Numerical study of performance evaluation

    Jakub Bodys;Michal Palacz;Michal Haida;Jacek Smolka

  • Performance comparison of fixed-and controllable-geometry ejectors in a CO2 refrigeration system.

    Jacek Smolka;Michal Palacz;Jakub Bodys;Krzysztof Banasiak

  • Influence of external flue gas recirculation on gas combustion in a coke oven heating system

    Unknown

  • Shape Optimization of Coils and Cooling Ducts in Dry-Type Transformers Using Computational Fluid Dynamics and Genetic Algorithm

    Unknown

  • Numerical and experimental investigation of heat transfer process in electromagnetically driven flow within a vacuum induction furnace

    Unknown

  • Numerical and experimental analysis of heat dissipation intensification from electric motor

    Unknown

  • An effective 3-D inverse procedure to retrieve cooling conditions in an aluminium alloy continuous casting problem

    Iwona Nowak;Jacek Smolka;Andrzej J. Nowak

  • Coupled numerical modelling of power loss generation in busbar system of low-voltage switchgear

    Mateusz Bedkowski;Jacek Smolka;Krzysztof Banasiak;Zbigniew Bulinski

Frequent Co-Authors

Armin Hafner
Armin Hafner Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Giampaolo Manfrida
Giampaolo Manfrida University of Florence
Luiz C. Wrobel
Luiz C. Wrobel Brunel University London
Derek B. Ingham
Derek B. Ingham University of Sheffield
Oszkar Biro
Oszkar Biro Graz University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering can broaden your career opportunities and skill set. For instance, those interested in complementary fields might consider programs in speech-language pathology. Understanding the requirements of slp grad school can provide insights into graduate admissions and program competitiveness, which is helpful when planning your educational trajectory.

When searching for accessible programs, reviewing the easiest audiology programs to get into can serve as a guide to finding a program that aligns with your background and goals. This ensures a smoother transition into a related healthcare or technical discipline.

Cost is also a crucial factor for many students. Knowing the details about online speech pathology degree costs and fees helps in budgeting for your education. Online programs often offer flexibility and affordability, which can be key for working professionals.

For veterans interested in expanding their qualifications, information on online speech pathology degree programs for veterans highlights specialized support and benefits available, making higher education more accessible.

Best Scientists Citing Jacek Smolka

Recently Published Articles