World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Rodrigo Llopis

Rodrigo Llopis

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
38
Citations
4155
World Ranking
2331
National Ranking
29

Rodrigo Llopis publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rodrigo Llopis sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 132 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Rodrigo Llopis D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rodrigo Llopis sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Energy performance evaluation of R1234yf, R1234ze(E), R600a, R290 and R152a as low-GWP R134a alternatives.

    Unknown

  • Energy improvements of CO2 transcritical refrigeration cycles using dedicated mechanical subcooling

    Unknown

  • Subcooling methods for CO2 refrigeration cycles: A review

    Unknown

  • Energetic evaluation of an internal heat exchanger in a CO2 transcritical refrigeration plant using experimental data

    Unknown

  • Experimental evaluation of a CO2 transcritical refrigeration plant with dedicated mechanical subcooling

    Unknown

  • Energy and environmental comparison of two-stage solutions for commercial refrigeration at low temperature: Fluids and systems

    Unknown

  • Experimental evaluation of the energy efficiency of a CO2 refrigerating plant working in transcritical conditions

    Unknown

  • A simplified model for shell-and-tubes heat exchangers: Practical application

    F. Vera-García;J.R. García-Cascales;J. Gonzálvez-Maciá;R. Cabello

  • Experimental evaluation of a R134a/CO2 cascade refrigeration plant

    Unknown

  • Energy evaluation of R152a as drop in replacement for R134a in cascade refrigeration plants

    Unknown

  • Experimental comparison between R152a and R134a working in a refrigeration facility equipped with a hermetic compressor

    Unknown

  • Influence of the superheat associated to a semihermetic compressor of a transcritical CO2 refrigeration plant

    Unknown

  • Experimental evaluation of the inter-stage conditions of a two-stage refrigeration cycle using a compound compressor

    Unknown

  • New positions for an internal heat exchanger in a CO2 supercritical refrigeration plant. Experimental analysis and energetic evaluation

    Unknown

  • Energy impact evaluation of different low-GWP alternatives to replace R134a in a beverage cooler. Experimental analysis and optimization for the pure refrigerants R152a, R1234yf, R290, R1270, R600a and R744

    Unknown

  • Performance evaluation of R404A and R507A refrigerant mixtures in an experimental double-stage vapour compression plant

    Unknown

  • Thermodynamic screening of alternative refrigerants for R290 and R600a

    Unknown

  • Energy assessment and environmental impact analysis of an R134a/R744 cascade refrigeration plant upgraded with the low-GWP refrigerants R152a, R1234ze(E), propane (R290) and propylene (R1270)

    Unknown

  • Energy analysis of dedicated and integrated mechanical subcooled CO2 boosters for supermarket applications

    Unknown

  • Experimental evaluation of an internal heat exchanger in a CO2 subcritical refrigeration cycle with gas-cooler

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Ramón Cabello
Ramón Cabello Jaume I University
Joaquín Navarro-Esbrí
Joaquín Navarro-Esbrí Jaume I University
Angelo Maiorino
Angelo Maiorino University of Salerno
Ciro Aprea
Ciro Aprea University of Salerno

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their skill set beyond Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, complementary fields like Speech-Language Pathology (SLP) offer promising online degree options. Understanding the requirements to enter these programs is crucial. For example, the slp grad school admissions processes often include specific prerequisites and competitive acceptance rates that applicants should be prepared for.

Finding accessible programs can make all the difference. Some students prefer to target the easiest online slp programs to get into, focusing on those with flexible admission criteria without sacrificing quality education. This approach can be especially helpful for working professionals or those transitioning from engineering disciplines.

Cost is always a significant factor. Many prospective students research online speech pathology school cost to budget accordingly and find programs offering good value. Scholarships, financial aid, and tuition assistance can also play essential roles in managing expenses.

Veterans looking to further their education benefit from tailored opportunities. There are specific options like the online speech pathology bachelor degree for veterans, which provide support aligned with their unique needs and experiences, making the journey smoother for those transitioning into new careers.

Best Scientists Citing Rodrigo Llopis

Recently Published Articles