World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
87
Citations
27957
World Ranking
13638
National Ranking
1267

J Newsom-Davis publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J Newsom-Davis sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 480 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

J Newsom-Davis D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J Newsom-Davis sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2001 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

J Newsom-Davis was affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their career included contributions to academic research connected to this institution.

In 2001, J Newsom-Davis was recognized as a Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM), reflecting an acknowledgment by a prominent professional body.

As the scientist is deceased, this overview is presented in the past tense.

Best Publications

  • Auto-antibodies to the receptor tyrosine kinase MuSK in patients with myasthenia gravis without acetylcholine receptor antibodies

    Werner Hoch;John McConville;Sigrun Helms;John Newsom-Davis

  • CONTROLLED TRIAL OF PREDNISOLONE IN ACUTE POLYNEUROPATHY

    R.A.C. Hughes;J.M. Newsom-Davis;G.D. Perkin;J.M. Pierce

  • Neurofibromatosis type 2

    Ashok R Asthagiri;Dilys M Parry;John A Butman;H Jeffrey Kim

  • Acetylcholine receptor antibody as a diagnostic test for myasthenia gravis: results in 153 validated cases and 2967 diagnostic assays.

    A Vincent;J Newsom-Davis

  • Clinical, pathological, HLA antigen and immunological evidence for disease heterogeneity in myasthenia gravis.

    D. A. S. Compston;A. Vincent;J. Newsom-Davis;J. R. Batchelor

  • A randomized double‐blind trial of prednisolone alone or with azathioprine in myasthenia gravis

    J Palace;J Newsom-Davis;B Lecky

  • Phenotypic variants of autoimmune peripheral nerve hyperexcitability

    Ian K. Hart;Paul Maddison;John Newsom‐Davis;Angela Vincent

  • Detection and characterization of MuSK antibodies in seronegative myasthenia gravis

    John McConville;Maria Elena Farrugia;David Beeson;Uday Kishore

  • Acquired neuromyotonia: evidence for autoantibodies directed against K+ channels of peripheral nerves.

    Paul Shillito;Peter C. Molenaar;Angela Vincent;Angela Vincent;Katherine Leys

  • AUTOIMMUNE AETIOLOGY FOR MYASTHENIC (EATON-LAMBERT) SYNDROME

    Bethan Lang;Dennis Wray;John Newsom-Davis;Angela Vincent

  • Autoantibodies detected to expressed K+ channels are implicated in neuromyotonia.

    Ian K. Hart;Caroline Waters;Angela Vincent;Claire Newland

  • Small-cell lung cancer, paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration and the Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome.

    W P Mason;F Graus;B Lang;J Honnorat

  • Passive transfer of Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome with IgG from man to mouse depletes the presynaptic membrane active zones.

    Hidetoshi Fukunaga;Andrew G. Engel;Bethan Lang;John Newsom-Davis

  • Function of circulating antibody to acetylcholine receptor in myasthenia gravis Investigation by plasma exchange

    J. Newsom-Davis;A. J. Pinching;Angela Vincent;S. G. Wilson

  • Effects of intravenous immunoglobulin on muscle weakness and calcium-channel autoantibodies in the Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome

    P. G. Bain;M. Motomura;J. Newsom-Davis;S. A. Misbah

  • An improved diagnostic assay for Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome.

    M Motomura;I Johnston;B Lang;A Vincent

  • Incidence of serum anti-P/Q-type and anti-N-type calcium channel autoantibodies in the Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome

    Masakatsu Motomura;Bethan Lang;Irene Johnston;Jacqueline Palace

  • Myasthenia gravis without acetylcholine-receptor antibody: a distinct disease entity.

    S. Mossman;A. Vincent;J. Newsom-Davis

  • Dok-7 Mutations Underlie a Neuromuscular Junction Synaptopathy

    David Beeson;Osamu Higuchi;Jackie Palace;Judy Cossins

  • Autoimmune aetiology for acquired neuromyotonia (Isaacs' syndrome)

    S Sinha;J Newsom-Davis;K Mills;N Byrne

Frequent Co-Authors

Angela Vincent
Angela Vincent University of Oxford
David Beeson
David Beeson University of Oxford
Nick Willcox
Nick Willcox University of Oxford
Hugh J. Willison
Hugh J. Willison University of Glasgow
Sue Povey
Sue Povey University College London
Paul Moss
Paul Moss University of Birmingham
David Colquhoun
David Colquhoun University of Queensland
Catharina Larsson
Catharina Larsson Karolinska University Hospital
John I. Bell
John I. Bell Ellison Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in medical careers beyond traditional MD programs, there are numerous online pathways to consider. Many students are choosing flexible and cost-effective education options to launch or advance their healthcare careers.

An online pharmacy degree can open doors to clinical or research roles in pharmaceuticals, while a him bachelor's degree online prepares you for growing opportunities in managing digital health records and healthcare data.

Individuals looking for entry-level positions may be interested in earning a certification in medical billing and coding. Understanding the medical billing and coding certification cost makes these programs even more accessible to those starting out or looking for a career change.

For nurses seeking to expand their scope of practice, cheap online fnp programs provide a convenient way to advance education while managing work and life commitments.

Exploring these online options can help you find the educational and career path that fits your goals, budget, and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing J Newsom-Davis

Recently Published Articles