World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 63 8393 7624 8 8 189 14734

Inas M. AlNashef publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Inas M. AlNashef between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Inas M. AlNashef published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 6.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2013. 23 of the 205 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2013. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 8 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 12 publications
1996 2025

205 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Inas M. AlNashef: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 2
2003 1
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 1
2008 1
2009 1
2010 8
2011 9
2012 20
2013 22
2014 14
2015 19
2016 10
2017 10
2018 7
2019 7
2020 15
2021 11
2022 8
2023 13
2024 11
2025 12
Total 205
Download as CSV

Inas M. AlNashef publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Inas M. AlNashef sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 189 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344 189
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Inas M. AlNashef D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Inas M. AlNashef sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834 63
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Inas M. AlNashef is affiliated with Khalifa University in the United Arab Emirates. Their research primarily focuses on chemical engineering and engineering disciplines, with significant contributions to catalysis, mechanical engineering, biomedical engineering, filtration and separation, and materials chemistry.

The main topics of Inas M. AlNashef's work involve ionic liquids properties and applications, chemical and physical properties in aqueous solutions, extraction and separation processes, phase equilibria and thermodynamics, carbon dioxide capture technologies, electrochemical analysis and applications, and carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis.

Their recent papers include the following notable publications:

  • Prediction of Electrical Conductivity of Deep Eutectic Solvents Using COSMO-RS Sigma Profiles as Molecular Descriptors: A Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Study (2020), published in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
  • Predicting the density and viscosity of hydrophobic eutectic solvents: towards the development of sustainable solvents (2020), published in Green Chemistry
  • Predicting the Surface Tension of Deep Eutectic Solvents Using Artificial Neural Networks (2022), published in ACS Omega
  • Boron extraction from aqueous medium using novel hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents (2020), published in Chemical Engineering Journal
  • Removal of chlorophenols from aqueous media with hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents: Experimental study and COSMO RS evaluation (2020), published in Journal of Molecular Liquids

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Inas M. AlNashef include:

  • Tarek Lemaoui
  • Ahmad S. Darwish
  • Fawzi Banat
  • Yacine Benguerba
  • Ghaiath Almustafa

Their work has been published repeatedly in several journals, highlighting sustained engagement with specific research communities. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • Journal of Molecular Liquids
  • Chemical Engineering Journal
  • ACS Omega
  • ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
  • Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

Research areas covered extensively by Inas M. AlNashef include chemical engineering subfields such as catalysis and filtration and separation techniques, alongside engineering fields like mechanical and biomedical engineering. The broad thematic focus includes experimental and computational studies related to ionic liquids and eutectic solvents, often addressing their properties relevant for sustainability and industrial applications.

Best Publications

  • Superoxide Ion: Generation and Chemical Implications

    Maan Hayyan;Mohd Ali Hashim;Inas M. AlNashef

  • Are deep eutectic solvents benign or toxic

    Maan Hayyan;Mohd Ali Hashim;Adeeb Hayyan;Mohammed A. Al-Saadi

  • Phosphonium-Based Ionic Liquids Analogues and Their Physical Properties

    Mukhtar A. Kareem;Farouq S. Mjalli;Mohd Ali Hashim;Inas M. AlNashef

  • A novel technique for separating glycerine from palm oil-based biodiesel using ionic liquids

    Maan Hayyan;Farouq S. Mjalli;Mohd Ali Hashim;Inas M. AlNashef

  • Densities of ammonium and phosphonium based deep eutectic solvents: Prediction using artificial intelligence and group contribution techniques

    K. Shahbaz;S. Baroutian;F.S. Mjalli;M.A. Hashim

  • Fruit sugar-based deep eutectic solvents and their physical properties

    Adeeb Hayyan;Adeeb Hayyan;Farouq S. Mjalli;Inas M. AlNashef;Talal Al-Wahaibi

  • Investigating the electrochemical windows of ionic liquids

    Maan Hayyan;Farouq S. Mjalli;Mohd Ali Hashim;Inas M. AlNashef

  • Prospects of applying ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents for renewable energy storage by means of redox flow batteries

    Mohammed Harun Chakrabarti;Mohammed Harun Chakrabarti;Farouq Sabri Mjalli;Inas Muen AlNashef;Mohd. Ali Hashim

  • Assessment of cytotoxicity and toxicity for phosphonium-based deep eutectic solvents.

    Maan Hayyan;Mohd. Ali Hashim;Mohammed A. Al-Saadi;Adeeb Hayyan

  • Prediction of deep eutectic solvents densities at different temperatures

    K. Shahbaz;F.S. Mjalli;M.A. Hashim;I.M. AlNashef

  • Using Deep Eutectic Solvents Based on Methyl Triphenyl Phosphunium Bromide for the Removal of Glycerol from Palm-Oil-Based Biodiesel

    K. Shahbaz;F. S. Mjalli;M. A. Hashim;I. M. AlNashef

  • Electrochemical Generation of Superoxide in Room-Temperature Ionic Liquids

    Inas M. AlNashef;Matthew L. Leonard;Matthew C. Kittle;Michael A. Matthews

  • Solubility of CO2 in deep eutectic solvents: Experiments and modelling using the Peng-Robinson equation of state

    Emad Ali;Mohamed K. Hadj-Kali;Sarwono Mulyono;Inas Alnashef

  • Deep oxidative desulfurization of liquid fuels

    Farouq S. Mjalli;Omar U. Ahmed;Talal Al-Wahaibi;Yahya Al-Wahaibi

  • Prediction of the surface tension of deep eutectic solvents

    K. Shahbaz;F.S. Mjalli;M.A. Hashim;I.M. AlNashef

  • Using deep eutectic solvents for the removal of glycerol from palm oil-based biodiesel.

    K. Shahbaz;Farouq. S. Mjalli;M. A. Hashim;Inas. M. Alnashef

  • A new processing route for cleaner production of biodiesel fuel using a choline chloride based deep eutectic solvent

    Adeeb Hayyan;Mohd Ali Hashim;Maan Hayyan;Farouq S. Mjalli

  • A novel phosphonium-based deep eutectic catalyst for biodiesel production from industrial low grade crude palm oil

    Adeeb Hayyan;Mohd Ali Hashim;Farouq S. Mjalli;Maan Hayyan

  • Eutectic solvents for the removal of residual palm oil-based biodiesel catalyst

    K. Shahbaz;F.S. Mjalli;M.A. Hashim;I.M. AlNashef

  • Prediction of Electrical Conductivity of Deep EutecticSolvents Using COSMO-RS Sigma Profiles as Molecular Descriptors: AQuantitative Structure–Property Relationship Study

    Tarek Lemaoui;Ahmad S. Darwish;Nour El Houda Hammoudi;Farah Abu Hatab

  • Separation of BTEX aromatics from n-octane using a (tetrabutylammonium bromide + sulfolane) deep eutectic solvent – experiments and COSMO-RS prediction

    Sarwono Mulyono;Hanee F. Hizaddin;Inas M. Alnashef;Mohd A. Hashim

Frequent Co-Authors

Farouq S. Mjalli
Farouq S. Mjalli Sultan Qaboos University
Mohd Ali Hashim
Mohd Ali Hashim University of Malaya
Maan Hayyan
Maan Hayyan A’Sharqiyah Universit
Yahya Al-Wahaibi
Yahya Al-Wahaibi A’Sharqiyah Universit
John W. Weidner
John W. Weidner University of Cincinnati
Shadi W. Hasan
Shadi W. Hasan Khalifa University
Nigel P. Brandon
Nigel P. Brandon Imperial College London
Mohammed M. Farid
Mohammed M. Farid University of Auckland
Alessandro Erto
Alessandro Erto University of Naples Federico II
Mohd Azlan Hussain
Mohd Azlan Hussain University of Malaya

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Chemistry in the USA, exploring interdisciplinary fields like forensic science and criminal justice can open diverse career opportunities. Many universities now offer an online forensic science degree that blends chemistry knowledge with investigative techniques. This option provides flexibility for working professionals and those seeking affordable education alternatives.

Those interested in the psychological aspects of criminal investigations might consider a master's in forensic psychology online. This degree complements a chemistry background by focusing on criminal behavior analysis and legal processes, broadening potential career pathways.

Understanding the financial realities is essential. Prospective students should research how much is criminal justice school to budget effectively for their education. Tuition and fees can vary widely between programs, so comparing options is crucial for affordable education planning.

Career prospects in these interdisciplinary fields are promising. According to recent statistics, the forensic scientist salary reflects a competitive and rewarding profession, often influenced by education level and specialization. Chemistry graduates branching into forensic sciences can expect strong demand and job satisfaction.

Best Scientists Citing Inas M. AlNashef

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles