World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
55
Citations
9226
World Ranking
2063
National Ranking
988

Ilene S. Speizer publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilene S. Speizer sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 230 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Ilene S. Speizer D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilene S. Speizer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ilene S. Speizer is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, with a focus on medicine, health professions, and social sciences. Within these fields, their work primarily addresses pediatrics, perinatology and child health, general health professions, safety research, public health, environmental and occupational health, as well as economics and econometrics.

The main topics of Ilene S. Speizer's research include:

  • Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
  • Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences

Their recent publications reflect these areas of study and include:

  • "Stigma in the health clinic and implications for PrEP access and use by adolescent girls and young women: conflicting perspectives in South Africa," 2022, published in BMC Public Health
  • "Priority Indicators for Adolescent Health Measurement - Recommendations From the Global Action for Measurement of Adolescent Health (GAMA) Advisory Group," 2022, published in Journal of Adolescent Health
  • "Urban Family Planning in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Critical Scoping Review," 2021, published in Frontiers in Global Women's Health
  • "Influences on seeking a contraceptive method among adolescent women in three cities in Nigeria," 2020, published in Reproductive Health
  • "Perceptions of peer contraceptive use and its influence on contraceptive method use and choice among young women and men in Kenya: a quantitative cross-sectional study," 2022, published in Reproductive Health

Ilene S. Speizer frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Lisa M. Calhoun
  • Siân Curtis
  • Courtney McGuire
  • David K. Guilkey
  • Amelia Maytan-Joneydi

The scientist's work has appeared often in a range of publication venues. The most common include:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Reproductive Health
  • Gates Open Research
  • Studies in Family Planning
  • Research Square

Best Publications

  • Abstinence-Only-Until-Marriage: An Updated Review of U.S. Policies and Programs and Their Impact

    John S. Santelli;Leslie M. Kantor;Leslie M. Kantor;Stephanie A. Grilo;Ilene S. Speizer

  • The effectiveness of adolescent reproductive health interventions in developing countries: a review of the evidence.

    Ilene S Speizer;Robert J Magnani;Charlotte E Colvin

  • What works in family planning interventions: a systematic review.

    Lisa Mwaikambo;Ilene S. Speizer;Anna Schurmann;Gwen Morgan

  • Toward a multidimensional measure of pregnancy intentions: evidence from the United States.

    John S. Santelli;Laura Duberstein Lindberg;Mark G. Orr;Lawrence B. Finer

  • Understanding pregnancy in a population of inner-city women in New Orleans--results of qualitative research

    Carl Kendall;Aimee Afable-Munsuz;Ilene Speizer;Alexis Avery

  • Intimate Partner Violence Attitudes and Experience Among Women and Men in Uganda

    Ilene S. Speizer

  • Trends in the Incidence of Outcomes Defining Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study: 1985–1991

    Alvaro Muñoz;Lewis K. Schrager;Lewis K. Schrager;Helena Bacellar;Helena Bacellar;Ilene Speizer

  • Belief in Family Planning Myths at the Individual and Community Levels and Modern Contraceptive Use in Urban Africa.

    Abdou Gueye;Ilene S. Speizer;Meghan Corroon;Chinelo C. Okigbo

  • Association between Early Marriage and Intimate Partner Violence in India: A Focus on Youth from Bihar and Rajasthan

    Ilene S. Speizer;Erin Pearson

  • Differences in food intake and exercise by smoking status in adolescents.

    Diane B. Wilson;Brian N. Smith;Ilene S. Speizer;Melanie K. Bean

  • The Role of Gender Empowerment on Reproductive Health Outcomes in Urban Nigeria

    Meghan Corroon;Ilene S. Speizer;Jean Christophe Fotso;Akinsewa Akiode

  • An Evaluation of the “Entre Nous Jeunes” Peer—educator Program for Adolescents in Cameroon

    Ilene S. Speizer;B. Oleko Tambashe;Simon Pierre Tegang

  • Gender relations and reproductive decision making in Honduras.

    Ilene S. Speizer;Lisa Whittle;Marion Carter

  • The impact of a family planning multimedia campaign in Bamako Mali.

    Thomas T. Kane;Mohamadou Gueye;Ilene S. Speizer;Sara Pacque-Margolis

  • The role of social support and parity in contraceptive use in Cambodia.

    Ghazaleh Samandari;Ilene S. Speizer;Kathryn O'connell

  • Salvadoran fathers' attendance at prenatal care, delivery, and postpartum care

    Marion W Carter;Ilene Speizer

  • Measuring factors underlying intendedness of women's first and later pregnancies.

    Ilene S. Speizer;John S. Santelli;Aimee Afable-Munsuz;Carl Kendall

  • The impact of India’s accredited social health activist (ASHA) program on the utilization of maternity services: a nationally representative longitudinal modelling study

    Smisha Agarwal;Smisha Agarwal;Sian L. Curtis;Gustavo Angeles;Ilene S. Speizer

  • Do service providers in Tanzania unnecessarily restrict clients' access to contraceptive methods?

    Ilene S. Speizer;David R. Hotchkiss;Robert J. Magnani;Brian Hubbard

  • Can family planning outreach bridge the urban-rural divide in Zambia?

    Justin S White;Ilene S Speizer

  • Psychosocial factors associated with non-smoking adolescents' intentions to smoke

    Brian N. Smith;Melanie K. Bean;Karen S. Mitchell;Ilene S. Speizer

  • Quality of Care and Contraceptive Use in Urban Kenya.

    Katherine Tumlinson;Brian W. Pence;Siân L. Curtis;Stephen W. Marshall

Frequent Co-Authors

David K. Guilkey
David K. Guilkey University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Carl Kendall
Carl Kendall Tulane University
Susan Parnell
Susan Parnell University of Cape Town
Audrey Pettifor
Audrey Pettifor University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Wendee M. Wechsberg
Wendee M. Wechsberg Research Triangle Park Foundation
Luuk C. Rietveld
Luuk C. Rietveld Delft University of Technology
Keisuke Hanaki
Keisuke Hanaki University of Tokyo
Laura Duberstein Lindberg
Laura Duberstein Lindberg Guttmacher Institute
Karen S. Mitchell
Karen S. Mitchell Boston University
Yong-Guan Zhu
Yong-Guan Zhu Chinese Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities opens many opportunities for online study and flexible career pathways. For example, students interested in social work can explore a range of msw online programs that combine affordability and quality education, making them accessible to a wide audience.

Those looking to specialize in behavioral analysis may want to consider the cheapest bcba online program options. Cost is an important factor, and a variety of accredited programs allow you to advance your qualifications without accumulating significant debt.

Time constraints can also be a concern. For students needing a fast track toward their career, the availability of one year msw programs delivers a quick and rigorous pathway to professional practice.

Likewise, undergraduates can benefit from pursuing a 2-year psychology degree online, balancing their studies with personal and work commitments. Online programs provide diverse entry points and can help you build a career in social services, counseling, research, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Ilene S. Speizer

Trending Scientists