World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
UK
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 76 505 434 86 74 256 20629

John Cleland publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John Cleland between 1973 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John Cleland published across 49 years, from 1973 to 2021, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2011. 18 of the 259 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2011. 1973: 2 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 7 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 10 publications
1973 2021

259 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John Cleland: publications per year, 1973 to 2021
Year Publications
1973 2
1974 0
1975 0
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 2
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 3
1985 5
1986 5
1987 1
1988 3
1989 4
1990 2
1991 2
1992 2
1993 3
1994 1
1995 7
1996 5
1997 3
1998 2
1999 5
2000 6
2001 15
2002 4
2003 8
2004 13
2005 14
2006 11
2007 5
2008 6
2009 7
2010 8
2011 16
2012 16
2013 9
2014 2
2015 8
2016 12
2017 13
2018 4
2019 5
2020 8
2021 10
Total 259
Download as CSV

John Cleland publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Cleland sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 254–263 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 256 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162 256
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

John Cleland D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Cleland sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45 76
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Law
  • China
  • Social science

John Cleland focuses on Developing country, Family planning, Demography, Fertility and Reproductive health. His study in Developing country is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Environmental health, Marital status, Program evaluation, Family medicine and Socioeconomics. His Family planning research incorporates elements of Obstetrics and Birth rate.

His Demography study incorporates themes from Condom, Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, Cross-sectional study, Latin Americans and Gynecology. The study incorporates disciplines such as Economic growth, Birth control, Politics and Sociology of scientific knowledge in addition to Fertility. His work carried out in the field of Reproductive health brings together such families of science as Rural area and Socioeconomic status.

His most cited work include:

  • Family planning: the unfinished agenda (760 citations)
  • Demand Theories of the Fertility Transition: An Iconoclastic View (679 citations)
  • Maternal education and child survival in developing countries: the search for pathways of influence. (654 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His scientific interests lie mostly in Family planning, Demography, Developing country, Fertility and Reproductive health. His research in Family planning intersects with topics in Postpartum period, Gynecology, Discontinuation and Family medicine. His Demography study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Condom, Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, Abortion, Marital status and Public health.

His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Socioeconomic status, Program evaluation and Socioeconomics. His Fertility research includes elements of Developed country, Total fertility rate, Development economics and Breastfeeding. His Reproductive health course of study focuses on Environmental health and Rural area.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Family planning (36.40%)
  • Demography (35.56%)
  • Developing country (30.13%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2021)?

  • Demography (35.56%)
  • Family planning (36.40%)
  • Fertility (26.78%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

John Cleland spends much of his time researching Demography, Family planning, Fertility, Reproductive health and Developing country. His Demography research includes themes of Abortion, Total fertility rate, Public health, Population based and Pediatrics. He combines subjects such as Psychological intervention, Postpartum period, Discontinuation and Family medicine with his study of Family planning.

His work deals with themes such as Young adult, Population decline, Pill and Survey data collection, which intersect with Fertility. The Reproductive health study combines topics in areas such as Longitudinal study, Health care, Data collection, Rural setting and Qualitative research. His Developing country study results in a more complete grasp of Economic growth.

Between 2013 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Unmet Need for Contraception: Issues and Challenges (89 citations)
  • Interventions to Improve Postpartum Family Planning in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Program Implications and Research Priorities. (38 citations)
  • Unmet need for family planning in Ghana: the shifting contributions of lack of access and attitudinal resistance. (37 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Law
  • China
  • Social science

His main research concerns Family planning, Demography, Developing country, Fertility and Family medicine. His Family planning research integrates issues from Psychological intervention and Postpartum period. His Demography research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Sexual abstinence, Pediatrics and Socioeconomics.

John Cleland has included themes like Rural area, Young adult, Marital status, Public health and Pill in his Fertility study. As a part of the same scientific family, he mostly works in the field of Pill, focusing on Qualitative research and, on occasion, Reproductive health. His studies in Family medicine integrate themes in fields like Economic growth, MEDLINE, Program evaluation, Global health and Reproductive medicine.

Best Publications

  • Family planning: the unfinished agenda

    John Cleland;Stan Bernstein;Alex Ezeh;Anibal Faundes

  • Demand Theories of the Fertility Transition: An Iconoclastic View

    John Cleland;Christopher Wilson

  • Maternal education and child survival in developing countries: the search for pathways of influence.

    John G. Cleland;Jerome K. van Ginneken

  • The weight of nations: an estimation of adult human biomass

    Sarah Catherine Walpole;David Prieto-Merino;Phil Edwards;John Cleland

  • Contraception and health

    John Cleland;Agustin Conde-Agudelo;Herbert B Peterson;John Ross

  • Determinants of maternal care in a region of South India

    Jagdish C Bhatia;John Cleland

  • Institutional delivery in rural India: the relative importance of accessibility and economic status

    Amy J Kesterton;John Gf Cleland;Andy Sloggett;Carine Ronsmans

  • Self-reported symptoms of gynecological morbidity and their treatment in south India.

    Jagdish C Bhatia;John Cleland

  • Causes and consequences of contraceptive discontinuation: evidence from 60 Demographic and Health Surveys.

    Ali Mm;Cleland J;Shah Ih

  • Relationships between contraception and abortion: a review of the evidence.

    Cicely Marston;John Cleland

  • Family planning in sub-Saharan Africa: progress or stagnation?

    John G Cleland;Robert P Ndugwa;Eliya M Zulu

  • Unmet Need for Contraception: Issues and Challenges

    John Cleland;Sarah Harbison;Iqbal H. Shah

  • Maternal and child health services in rural Nepal: does access or quality matter more?

    Laxmi Bilas Acharya;John Cleland

  • Risk perception and condom use among married or cohabiting couples in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

    Pranitha Maharaj;John G. Cleland

  • Do unintended pregnancies carried to term lead to adverse outcomes for mother and child? An assessment in five developing countries

    Cicely Marston;John Cleland

  • The Effect of Parental Education on Marital Fertility in Developing Countries

    John Cleland;Germán Rodríguez

  • The Effect of Birth Spacing on Childhood Mortality in Pakistan

    J. G. Cleland;Zeba A. Sathar

  • Sexual Abstinence, Contraception, and Condom Use by Young African Women: A Secondary Analysis of Survey Data

    John G. Cleland;Mohamed M. Ali

  • Overview of migration, poverty and health dynamics in Nairobi City's slum settlements.

    Eliya M. Zulu;Donatien Beguy;Alex C. Ezeh;Philippe Bocquier

  • Monitoring sexual behaviour in general populations: a synthesis of lessons of the past decade

    J. G. Cleland;J. T. Boerma;M. Carael;S. S. Weir

  • Contraception in historical and global perspective

    John Cleland

  • The Determinants of Reproductive Change in Bangladesh: Success in a Challenging Environment.

    Geoffrey McNicoll;John Cleland;James F. Phillips;Sajeda Amin

Frequent Co-Authors

Alex Ezeh
Alex Ezeh Drexel University
Marleen Temmerman
Marleen Temmerman Aga Khan University
Claudia Garcia-Moreno
Claudia Garcia-Moreno World Health Organization
Susannah H. Mayhew
Susannah H. Mayhew London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Eliya M. Zulu
Eliya M. Zulu Shelter Insurance
John B. Casterline
John B. Casterline The Ohio State University
Gill Walt
Gill Walt London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Caroline W. Kabiru
Caroline W. Kabiru African Population and Health Research Center
John Bongaarts
John Bongaarts Population Council
Lenka Benova
Lenka Benova Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online msw programs has become increasingly popular among students interested in social work and human services. These flexible options allow you to balance academic goals with personal and professional responsibilities.

For those looking to work with individuals on the autism spectrum or in behavioral analysis, bcba masters programs offer specialized training and certification. This opens doors to roles in clinics, schools, and research institutions.

If you're eager to complete your studies quickly, an accelerated social work degree enables you to enter the workforce faster while maintaining academic rigor. Similarly, those interested in psychology can consider an accelerated psychology bachelor's degree to kickstart careers in counseling, human resources, or research.

These online degree pathways offer affordability, convenience, and diverse career opportunities in growing fields within the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing John Cleland

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles