World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
44
Citations
7350
World Ranking
4179
National Ranking
706

Ian H. Langford publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian H. Langford sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 302 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 80 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Ian H. Langford D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian H. Langford sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 261 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ian H. Langford was affiliated with the University of East Anglia in the United Kingdom. Their research spanned several aspects of immunology, microbiology, and medicine with a focus on infection control and microbial diagnostics.

The main fields of study that Ian H. Langford contributed to included Immunology and Microbiology and Medicine. Within these fields, notable subfields of their work involved Microbiology, Infectious Diseases, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, and Clinical Biochemistry.

Their research addressed a variety of topics related to infection control and microbiological processes, including:

  • Infection Control in Healthcare
  • Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection
  • Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Bacterial Infections and Vaccines

Among their recent papers were:

  • Hand hygiene on gloved hands: is glove integrity compromised by repeated disinfections? (2025), published in Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology
  • Evaluating chain-of-thought prompting in a GPT chatbot for BCID2 interpretation and stewardship: how does AI compare to human experts? (2025), published in Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology

Ian H. Langford frequently collaborated with other researchers including Michelle Doll, Tong-Zheng Zhao, Barry Rittmann, Patrick R Ching, and Pamela Bailey.

Their work was prominently published in the journal Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology, where they had multiple contributions.

Best Publications

  • A Quantitative Test of the Cultural Theory of Risk Perceptions: Comparison with the Psychometric Paradigm

    Claire Marris;Ian H. Langford;Timothy O'Riordan

  • A meta-analysis of wetland contingent valuation studies

    R. Brouwer;I. H. Langford;I. J. Bateman;R. K. Turner

  • Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies

    Ian J. Bateman;Ian H. Langford;R.Kerry Turner;Ken G. Willis

  • Non-users' Willingness to Pay for a National Park: An Application and Critique of the Contingent Valuation Method

    Ian J. Bateman;Ian H. Langford

  • Bound and path effects in double and triple bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation

    Ian J Bateman;Ian H Langford;Andrew P Jones;Geoffrey N Kerr

  • A quantitative test of the cultural theory of risk perceptions

    Claire Marris;Ian H. Langford;Timothy O'Riordan

  • Exploring the "psychometric paradigm": comparisons between aggregate and individual analyses.

    Claire Marris;Ian Langford;Thomas Saunderson;Timothy O'Riordan

  • Multilevel Modelling of the Geographical Distributions of Diseases

    Ian H. Langford;Alistair H. Leyland;Jon Rasbash;Harvey Goldstein

  • Coastal Management for Sustainable Development: Analysing Environmental and Socio-Economic Changes on the UK Coast

    RK Turner;I Lorenzoni;NJ Beaumont;IJ Bateman

  • Accidents to preschool children: comparing family and neighbourhood risk factors

    Richard Reading;Ian H Langford;Robin Haynes;Andrew Lovett

  • Modelling environmental influences on property prices in an urban environment

    Iain R Lake;Andrew A Lovett;Ian J Bateman;Ian H Langford

  • Integrating stakeholder analysis in non-market valuation of environmental assets

    Areti Kontogianni;Mihalis S. Skourtos;Ian H. Langford;Ian J. Bateman

  • An Existential Approach to Risk Perception

    Ian H. Langford

  • The potential effects of climate change on winter mortality in England and Wales

    Ian H. Langford;Graham Bentham

  • Environmental temperatures and the incidence of food poisoning in England and Wales.

    Graham Bentham;I. H. Langford

  • Public Attitudes to Contingent Valuation and Public Consultation

    R. Brouwer;N. Powe;R. K. Turner;I. J. Bateman

  • Valuing marine parks in a developing country: a case study of the Seychelles

    Laurence F. Mathieu;Ian H. Langford;Wendy Kenyon

  • Determinants of Individuals' Willingness to Pay for Perceived Reductions in Environmental Health Risks: A Case Study of Bathing Water Quality

    S Georgiou;I H Langford;I J Bateman;R K Turner

  • The Axford debate revisited: A case study illustrating different approaches to the aggregation of benefits data

    Ian J. Bateman;Ian H. Langford;Naohito Nishikawa;Iain Lake

  • Disease Mapping and Risk Assessment for Public Health

    IH Langford;AH Leyland;Rasbash;Harvey Goldstein

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy O'Riordan
Timothy O'Riordan University of East Anglia
Harvey Goldstein
Harvey Goldstein University of Bristol
Alastair H. Leyland
Alastair H. Leyland University of Glasgow
Irene Lorenzoni
Irene Lorenzoni University of East Anglia
Andrew A. Lovett
Andrew A. Lovett University of East Anglia
R. Kerry Turner
R. Kerry Turner University of East Anglia
Nicola Beaumont
Nicola Beaumont Plymouth Marine Laboratory
J.C.J.M. van den Bergh
J.C.J.M. van den Bergh Autonomous University of Barcelona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens the door to a variety of in-demand careers. Accredited online degree programs now offer even more flexible options to enter fields like psychology, education, and therapy.

Those interested in advanced psychology roles can consider online psyd programs, which prepare graduates for clinical practice and leadership positions. If you want to support families and relationships, marriage and family therapy online programs accredited are a great pathway to licensure and professional work as an MFT.

For students seeking affordability, there are now many cheap psychology masters programs that help you take the next step in your education without high tuition. Educators looking to advance can find accelerated edd programs, allowing you to earn a Doctor of Education quickly.

Online studies supply flexible, convenient approaches to building meaningful careers in Social Sciences and Humanities, while meeting high professional standards.

Best Scientists Citing Ian H. Langford

Recently Published Articles