World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
48
Citations
8165
World Ranking
18413
National Ranking
7518

Gregory C. Lanzaro publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregory C. Lanzaro sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 154 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Gregory C. Lanzaro D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregory C. Lanzaro sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gregory C. Lanzaro is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on mosquito-borne diseases and control, with significant work in malaria research and control. Lanzaro's work spans multiple fields including medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

Their key areas of study include public health, environmental and occupational health, molecular biology, insect science, genetics, and immunology. Prominent topics in their research cover mosquito-borne diseases and control strategies, malaria research, insect symbiosis and bacterial influences, CRISPR and genetic engineering, insect resistance and genetics, invertebrate immune response mechanisms, and viral infections involving vectors.

Lanzaro has published extensively in several noted scientific venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Scientific Reports
  • American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
  • BMC Genomics
  • Evolutionary Applications
  • Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

Recent publications by Gregory C. Lanzaro include:

  • Development of a confinable gene drive system in the human disease vector Aedes aegypti, 2020, eLife
  • Next-generation gene drive for population modification of the malaria vector mosquito, Anopheles gambiae, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Emergence of behavioural avoidance strategies of malaria vectors in areas of high LLIN coverage in Tanzania, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Abundance of conserved CRISPR-Cas9 target sites within the highly polymorphic genomes of Anopheles and Aedes mosquitoes, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Selection of sites for field trials of genetically engineered mosquitoes with gene drive, 2021, Evolutionary Applications

The scientist collaborates frequently with several colleagues in the field, including Anthony J. Cornel, Yoosook Lee, Melina Campos, Marc Crepeau, and João Pinto. These collaborations have contributed to a body of work crossing multiple disciplines within vector biology and genetic technologies.

Best Publications

  • Sequencing of Culex quinquefasciatus Establishes a Platform for Mosquito Comparative Genomics

    Peter Arensburger;Karine Megy;Robert M Waterhouse;Robert M Waterhouse;Jenica Abrudan

  • Cellodextrin Transport in Yeast for Improved Biofuel Production

    Jonathan M. Galazka;Chaoguang Tian;Chaoguang Tian;William T. Beeson;Bruno Martinez

  • Sandfly Maxadilan Exacerbates Infection with Leishmania major and Vaccinating Against It Protects Against L. major Infection

    Robin V. Morris;Charles B. Shoemaker;John R. David;Gregory C. Lanzaro

  • Adaptive introgression in an African malaria mosquito coincident with the increased usage of insecticide-treated bed nets

    Laura C. Norris;Bradley J. Main;Yoosook Lee;Travis C. Collier

  • Complexities in the genetic structure of Anopheles gambiae populations in west Africa as revealed by microsatellite DNA analysis

    Gregory C. Lanzaro;Yeya T. Touré;John Carnahan;Liangbiao Zheng

  • DNA analysis of transferred sperm reveals significant levels of gene flow between molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae.

    F. Tripet;Y. T. Touré;C. E. Taylor;D. E. Norris

  • Development of a confinable gene drive system in the human disease vector Aedes aegypti

    Ming Li;Ting Yang;Nikolay P Kandul;Michelle Bui

  • Saliva of Lutzomyia longipalpis sibling species differs in its composition and capacity to enhance leishmaniasis.

    Alon Warburg;Elvira Saraiva;Gregory C. Lanzaro;Richard G. Titus

  • Lutzomyia longipalpis is a species complex : genetic divergence and interspecific hybrid sterility among three populations

    Gregory C. Lanzaro;Katherine Ostrovska;Marco V. Herrero;Phillip G. Lawyer

  • Next-generation gene drive for population modification of the malaria vector mosquito, Anopheles gambiae.

    Rebeca Carballar-Lejarazú;Christian Ogaugwu;Christian Ogaugwu;Taylor Tushar;Adam Kelsey

  • Frequency of multiple inseminations in field-collected Anopheles gambiae females revealed by DNA analysis of transferred sperm.

    Frédéric Tripet;Yeya T. Touré;Guimogo Dolo;Gregory C. Lanzaro

  • Phylogeography of the neotropical sand fly Lutzomyia longipalpis inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences.

    J. C. Arrivillaga;D. E. Norris;M. D. Feliciangeli;Gregory C Lanzaro

  • Sand fly saliva enhances Leishmania amazonensis infection by modulating interleukin-10 production.

    Nilufer B. Norsworthy;Jiaren Sun;Dia Elnaiem;Gregory C Lanzaro

  • Different combinations of gap repressors for common stripes in Anopheles and Drosophila embryos

    Yury Goltsev;William Hsiong;Gregory Lanzaro;Michael Steven Levine

  • Relationship between kdr mutation and resistance to pyrethroid and DDT insecticides in natural populations of Anopheles gambiae.

    Lisa Reimer;Etienne Fondjo;Salomon Patchoké;Brehima Diallo

  • Gene Flow Among Populations of the Malaria Vector, Anopheles gambiae, in Mali, West Africa

    Charles Taylor;Yeya T. Touré;John Carnahan;Douglas E. Norris

  • Microsatellite DNA and isozyme variability in a West African population of Anopheles gambiae

    Gregory C Lanzaro;L. Zheng;Y. T. Toure;S. F. Traore

  • Spatiotemporal dynamics of gene flow and hybrid fitness between the M and S forms of the malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae.

    Yoosook Lee;Clare D. Marsden;Laura C. Norris;Travis C. Collier

  • Spatial and habitat distribution of Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae) in Banambani village, Mali.

    Frances E. Edillo;Yeya T. Touré;Gregory C. Lanzaro;Guimogo Dolo

  • Genomes & Developmental Control Different combinations of gap repressors for common stripes in Anopheles and Drosophila embryos

    Yury Goltsev;William Hsiong;Gregory Lanzaro;Mike Levine

Frequent Co-Authors

Eleazar Eskin
Eleazar Eskin University of California, Los Angeles
Alon Warburg
Alon Warburg Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Bart G. J. Knols
Bart G. J. Knols Wageningen University & Research
Montgomery Slatkin
Montgomery Slatkin University of California, Berkeley
Andrew Spielman
Andrew Spielman Harvard University
Marc A. T. Muskavitch
Marc A. T. Muskavitch Biogen (United States)
Omar S. Akbari
Omar S. Akbari University of California, San Diego
Evgeny M. Zdobnov
Evgeny M. Zdobnov Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
Anthony A. James
Anthony A. James University of California, Irvine
Michael S. Levine
Michael S. Levine Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry opens the door to a range of specialized healthcare and research careers. Many students and professionals are now choosing flexible learning options to expand their expertise or change career direction. For those passionate about wellness and disease prevention, a master degree in nutrition online can lead to advanced roles in clinical nutrition, health education, and food science.

If you're interested in medical imaging, several accredited programs, such as sonography programs online, prepare graduates for careers as ultrasound technicians—a crucial, in-demand field. Similarly, an online radiology tech programs is a practical stepping stone into medical diagnostics, combining biology knowledge with technological skills.

For those seeking to specialize further, dietetics masters programs offer comprehensive training in clinical dietetics and public health, fulfilling requirements for dietitian certification. Exploring these online pathways can help you align your Biology or Biochemistry background with diverse healthcare careers, offering flexibility and marketable skills for the future.

Best Scientists Citing Gregory C. Lanzaro

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles