World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
44
Citations
6165
World Ranking
7245
National Ranking
3120

Gina L. Forster publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gina L. Forster sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 114 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Gina L. Forster D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gina L. Forster sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gina L. Forster is affiliated with the University of Otago in New Zealand. Their research primarily intersects the fields of Medicine, Neuroscience, and Psychology, with notable contributions to several subfields such as Epidemiology, Behavioral Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Neurology, and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

The main topics of their research encompass Traumatic Brain Injury Research, Stress Responses and Cortisol, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances, Neuroendocrine Regulation and Behavior, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics.

Forster's recent published papers include the following:

  • Cortical volume abnormalities in posttraumatic stress disorder: an ENIGMA-psychiatric genomics consortium PTSD workgroup mega-analysis, 2020, Molecular Psychiatry
  • Assessment of brain age in posttraumatic stress disorder: Findings from the ENIGMA PTSD and brain age working groups, 2021, Brain and Behavior
  • A comparison of methods to harmonize cortical thickness measurements across scanners and sites, 2022, NeuroImage
  • Smaller total and subregional cerebellar volumes in posttraumatic stress disorder: a mega-analysis by the ENIGMA-PGC PTSD workgroup, 2024, Molecular Psychiatry
  • Neuroimaging-based classification of PTSD using data-driven computational approaches: A multisite big data study from the ENIGMA-PGC PTSD consortium, 2023, NeuroImage

Frequent publication venues for Forster include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Molecular Psychiatry
  • NeuroImage
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology
  • Brain and Behavior

Collaborations are a significant aspect of Forster's work. Frequent co-authors include Lee A. Baugh, Kelene A. Fercho, Jamie L. Scholl, Judith K. Daniels, and Richard J. Davidson. Each of these collaborators has co-authored multiple papers, highlighting a pattern of ongoing research partnerships within Forster's scientific community.

Best Publications

  • Adult rats exposed to early-life social isolation exhibit increased anxiety and conditioned fear behavior, and altered hormonal stress responses.

    Jodi L. Lukkes;Maxim V. Mokin;Jamie L. Scholl;Gina L. Forster

  • Laterodorsal tegmental stimulation elicits dopamine efflux in the rat nucleus accumbens by activation of acetylcholine and glutamate receptors in the ventral tegmental area

    Gina L. Forster;Charles D. Blaha

  • Stress coping style predicts aggression and social dominance in rainbow trout

    Øyvind Øverli;Wayne J Korzan;Erik Höglund;Svante Winberg

  • Consequences of post-weaning social isolation on anxiety behavior and related neural circuits in rodents.

    Jodi L Lukkes;Michael J Watt;Christopher A Lowry;Gina L Forster

  • Pedunculopontine tegmental stimulation evokes striatal dopamine efflux by activation of acetylcholine and glutamate receptors in the midbrain and pons of the rat.

    Gina L. Forster;Charles D. Blaha

  • Adolescent male rats exposed to social defeat exhibit altered anxiety behavior and limbic monoamines as adults.

    Michael J. Watt;Andrew R. Burke;Kenneth J. Renner;Gina L. Forster

  • Sex differences in anxiety-like behaviors in rats.

    Jamie L. Scholl;Anum Afzal;Laura C. Fox;Michael J. Watt;Michael J. Watt

  • M5 muscarinic receptors are required for prolonged accumbal dopamine release after electrical stimulation of the pons in mice.

    Gina L. Forster;John S. Yeomans;Junichi Takeuchi;Charles D. Blaha

  • Does Serotonin Influence Aggression? Comparing Regional Activity before and during Social Interaction*

    Cliff H. Summers;Wayne J. Korzan;Jodi L. Lukkes;Michael J. Watt

  • M5 muscarinic receptors are needed for slow activation of dopamine neurons and for rewarding brain stimulation

    John Yeomans;Gina Forster;Charles Blaha

  • Corticotropin-releasing factor in the dorsal raphe nucleus increases medial prefrontal cortical serotonin via type 2 receptors and median raphe nucleus activity.

    Gina L. Forster;Ronald B. Pringle;Nicholas J. Mouw;Shawn M. Vuong

  • Corticotropin-releasing factor 1 and 2 receptors in the dorsal raphé differentially affect serotonin release in the nucleus accumbens.

    Jodi L. Lukkes;Gina L. Forster;Kenneth J. Renner;Cliff H. Summers

  • Restraint stress increases serotonin release in the central nucleus of the amygdala via activation of corticotropin-releasing factor receptors.

    Bing Mo;Na Feng;Kenneth Renner;Gina L Forster

  • Glucocorticoid interaction with aggression in non-mammalian vertebrates : Reciprocal action

    Cliff H. Summers;Michael J. Watt;Travis L. Ling;Gina L. Forster

  • Corticotropin-releasing factor in the dorsal raphe elicits temporally distinct serotonergic responses in the limbic system in relation to fear behavior.

    Gina L Forster;N. Feng;M. J. Watt;W. J. Korzan

  • Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Receptor Antagonism within the Dorsal Raphe Nucleus Reduces Social Anxiety-Like Behavior after Early-Life Social Isolation

    Jodi Lukkes;Shawn Vuong;Jamie L Scholl;Harvey Oliver

  • Mild traumatic brain injury in the rat alters neuronal number in the limbic system and increases conditioned fear and anxiety-like behaviors.

    Danielle L. Meyer;Daniel R. Davies;Jeffrey L. Barr;Jeffrey L. Barr;Pasquale Manzerra

  • Altered white matter microstructural organization in posttraumatic stress disorder across 3047 adults: results from the PGC-ENIGMA PTSD consortium

    Emily L Dennis;Seth G Disner;Seth G Disner;Negar Fani;Lauren E Salminen

  • Adolescent social defeat increases adult amphetamine conditioned place preference and alters D2 dopamine receptor expression

    Andrew R. Burke;Michael J. Watt;Gina L. Forster

  • Early life social isolation alters corticotropin-releasing factor responses in adult rats

    Jodi L. Lukkes;Cliff H. Summers;Jamie L. Scholl;Kenneth J. Renner

  • Impact of juvenile chronic stress on adult cortico-accumbal function: Implications for cognition and addiction

    Michael J. Watt;Matthew A. Weber;Shaydel R. Davies;Gina L. Forster

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth J. Renner
Kenneth J. Renner University of South Dakota
Cliff H. Summers
Cliff H. Summers University of South Dakota
Charles D. Blaha
Charles D. Blaha Mayo Clinic
Kerry J. Ressler
Kerry J. Ressler Harvard University
Rajendra A. Morey
Rajendra A. Morey Duke University
Tanja Jovanovic
Tanja Jovanovic Wayne State University
Steven M. Nelson
Steven M. Nelson Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center
John S. Yeomans
John S. Yeomans University of Toronto
Martha E. Shenton
Martha E. Shenton Harvard University
Jeffrey S. Simons
Jeffrey S. Simons University of South Dakota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Gina L. Forster

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles