World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
59
Citations
10973
World Ranking
4045
National Ranking
1836

Faye S. Silverstein publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Faye S. Silverstein sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 149 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Faye S. Silverstein D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Faye S. Silverstein sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Faye S. Silverstein is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a specific focus on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Emergency Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist has contributed to several main research topics, including neonatal and fetal brain pathology, cardiac arrest and resuscitation, mechanical circulatory support devices, cardiac ischemia and reperfusion, neonatal and maternal infections, neonatal respiratory health research, and the neuroscience of respiration and sleep.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Faye S. Silverstein include:

  • Electrographic Seizures and Brain Injury in Children Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation, 2020, published in Pediatric Neurology
  • Azithromycin reduces inflammation-amplified hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in neonatal rats, 2021, published in Pediatric Research
  • Comparing Neuroprotective Drug Efficacy in Rodent Neonatal Brain Injury Models, 2025, published in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

The scientist has published multiple works in several journals, with frequent appearances in Pediatric Neurology, Pediatric Research, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

Faye S. Silverstein has worked with a range of co-authors, including Julie Sturza, John Barks, Yiqing Liu, Robin J. Cook, and Stephanie Rau, with whom they have multiple collaborations.

Best Publications

  • Neurotoxicity of N-methyl-D-aspartate is markedly enhanced in developing rat central nervous system.

    John W. McDonald;Faye S. Silverstein;Michael V. Johnston

  • Therapeutic Hypothermia after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Children

    Frank W. Moler;Faye S. Silverstein;Richard Holubkov;Beth S. Slomine

  • Cerebral Hypoxia-Ischemia Stimulates Cytokine Gene Expression in Perinatal Rats

    Jerzy Szaflarski;Douglas Burtrum;Faye S. Silverstein

  • MK-801 protects the neonatal brain from hypoxic-ischemic damage

    John W. McDonald;Faye Sarah Silverstein;Michael V. Johnston

  • Contemporary Profile of Seizures in Neonates: A Prospective Cohort Study.

    Hannah C. Glass;Renée A. Shellhaas;Courtney J. Wusthoff;Taeun Chang

  • Evidence for transient perinatal glutamatergic innervation of globus pallidus

    Timothy Greenamyre;John B. Penney;Anne B. Young;Christopher Hudson

  • Magnesium reduces N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-mediated brain injury in perinatal rats.

    John W. McDonald;Faye Sarah Silverstein;Michael V. Johnston

  • Perinatal hypoxia-ischemia disrupts striatal high-affinity [3H]glutamate uptake into synaptosomes.

    Faye S. Silverstein;Karen Buchanan;Michael V. Johnston

  • Cytokines and perinatal brain injury.

    Faye S. Silverstein;John D. E. Barks;Pamela Hagan;Xiao Hong Liu

  • Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury Induces an Acute Microglial Reaction in Perinatal Rats

    Judith A Ivacko;Rong Sun;Faye S Silverstein

  • Neonatal hypoxic-ischemic injury increases forebrain subventricular zone neurogenesis in the mouse.

    Jennifer M. Plane;Ruowen Liu;Tsu Wei Wang;Faye S. Silverstein

  • Topiramate Extends the Therapeutic Window for Hypothermia-Mediated Neuroprotection After Stroke in Neonatal Rats

    Yi Qing Liu;John D. Barks;G. Xu;Faye S. Silverstein

  • Hypoxic-ischemic injury stimulates subventricular zone proliferation and neurogenesis in the neonatal rat.

    Jennifer Ong;Jennifer M Plane;Jack M Parent;Faye S Silverstein

  • Mice deficient in interleukin-1 converting enzyme are resistant to neonatal hypoxic-ischemic brain damage

    Xiao Hong Liu;Deborah Kwon;Gerald P. Schielke;Gerald P. Schielke;Guo Yuan Yang

  • Hypoxic-Ischemic Injury Induces Macrophage Inflammatory Protein-1α Expression in Immature Rat Brain

    Rita M. Cowell;Haiyan Xu;John M. Galasso;Faye S. Silverstein

  • Hypoxic-ischemic injury results in acute disruption of myelin gene expression and death of oligodendroglial precursors in neonatal mice.

    Robert P. Skoff;Denise A. Bessert;John D.E. Barks;Dekun Song

  • Neonatal seizures: multicenter variability in current treatment practices.

    Agnes I. Bartha;Jessica Shen;Karol H. Katz;Rebecca E. Mischel

  • Off-Label Use of Antiepileptic Drugs for the Treatment of Neonatal Seizures

    Faye S. Silverstein;Donna M. Ferriero

  • Hypoxic-Ischemic Oligodendroglial Injury in Neonatal Rat Brain

    Yiqing Liu;Faye S Silverstein;Robert Skoff;John D E Barks

  • Role of Glutamate Receptor-Mediated Excitotoxicity in Bilirubin-Induced Brain Injury in the Gunn Rat Model

    John W. McDonald;Steven M. Shapiro;Faye S. Silverstein;Michael V. Johnston

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael V. Johnston
Michael V. Johnston Kennedy Krieger Institute
Richard Holubkov
Richard Holubkov University of Utah
John W. McDonald
John W. McDonald Johns Hopkins University
Vinay M. Nadkarni
Vinay M. Nadkarni Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Jerzy P. Szaflarski
Jerzy P. Szaflarski University of Alabama at Birmingham
Jeffrey S. Warren
Jeffrey S. Warren University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jack M. Parent
Jack M. Parent University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Robert P. Skoff
Robert P. Skoff Wayne State University
Donna M. Ferriero
Donna M. Ferriero University of California, San Francisco
Renée A. Shellhaas
Renée A. Shellhaas Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online pathways in Neuroscience and related fields opens up flexible options for students balancing work or family. Many universities now offer 2 year accelerated bachelor degrees that allow you to fast-track your education and begin your career sooner.

When choosing your degree, consider both your interests in Neuroscience and long-term financial outcomes. Researching the best bachelor degrees and highest paying college majors can help you discover programs that offer strong career growth and impressive starting salaries.

For those concerned about affordability, many colleges online that accept fafsa provide valuable financial aid opportunities. Combining cost-effective programs with federal aid ensures a better return on your educational investment and reduces student debt.

Whether you’re hoping to enter research, healthcare, or other science-driven sectors, online degree pathways in Neuroscience offer flexible, credible, and affordable routes to rewarding careers in a high-demand field.

Best Scientists Citing Faye S. Silverstein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles