World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 52 3043 2776 1238 1099 247 9893

Eric Larour publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eric Larour between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eric Larour published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 12 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2016. 11 of the 289 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2016. 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 30 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 33 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 9 publications
2002 2025

289 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eric Larour: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 3
2003 1
2004 3
2005 1
2006 1
2007 3
2008 6
2009 6
2010 8
2011 30
2012 14
2013 16
2014 20
2015 12
2016 33
2017 20
2018 17
2019 17
2020 27
2021 15
2022 13
2023 12
2024 2
2025 9
Total 289
Download as CSV

Eric Larour publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Larour sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 238–247 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 247 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243 247
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Eric Larour D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Larour sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182 52
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Eric Larour is affiliated with the California Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a strong focus on several related subfields including Atmospheric Science, Oceanography, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Geophysics, and Global and Planetary Change.

The scientist's work covers multiple main topics, notably Cryospheric studies and observations, Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics, Geophysics and Gravity Measurements, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, Landslides and related hazards, and Climate change and permafrost.

Eric Larour has contributed to notable research papers over recent years. Recent publications include:

  • Projected land ice contributions to twenty-first-century sea level rise, 2021, Nature
  • ISMIP6 Antarctica: a multi-model ensemble of the Antarctic ice sheet evolution over the 21st century, 2020, The Cryosphere
  • The future sea-level contribution of the Greenland ice sheet: a multi-model ensemble study of ISMIP6, 2020, The Cryosphere
  • Experimental protocol for sea level projections from ISMIP6 stand-alone ice sheet models, 2020, The Cryosphere
  • Understanding of Contemporary Regional Sea-Level Change and the Implications for the Future, 2020, Reviews of Geophysics

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Eric Larour include Nicole-Jeanne Schlegel, Hélène Seroussi, Sophie Nowicki, Erik R. Ivins, and Surendra Adhikari.

In terms of publication venues, Eric Larour has most often published in Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), The Cryosphere, Harvard Dataverse, Geophysical Research Letters, and Geoscientific Model Development.

Best Publications

  • Continental scale, high order, high spatial resolution, ice sheet modeling using the Ice Sheet System Model (ISSM)

    E. Larour;H. Seroussi;H. Seroussi;M. Morlighem;M. Morlighem;E. Rignot;E. Rignot

  • Projected land ice contributions to twenty-first-century sea level rise

    Tamsin L Edwards;Sophie Nowicki;Sophie Nowicki;Ben Marzeion;Regine Hock;Regine Hock

  • ISMIP6 Antarctica: a multi-model ensemble of the Antarctic ice sheet evolution over the 21st century

    Hélène Seroussi;Sophie Nowicki;Antony J. Payne;Heiko Goelzer;Heiko Goelzer

  • Spatial patterns of basal drag inferred using control methods from a full-Stokes and simpler models for Pine Island Glacier, West Antarctica

    M. Morlighem;M. Morlighem;E. Rignot;E. Rignot;H. Seroussi;H. Seroussi;E. Larour

  • Grounding-line migration in plan-view marine ice-sheet models: results of the ice2sea MISMIP3d intercomparison

    Frank Pattyn;Laura Perichon;Gaël Durand;Lionel Favier

  • The future sea-level contribution of the Greenland ice sheet: a multi-model ensemble study of ISMIP6

    Heiko Goelzer;Heiko Goelzer;Heiko Goelzer;Sophie Nowicki;Anthony Payne;Eric Larour

  • Deeply incised submarine glacial valleys beneath the Greenland ice sheet

    M. Morlighem;E. Rignot;E. Rignot;J. Mouginot;H. Seroussi

  • GIA Model Statistics for GRACE Hydrology, Cryosphere, and Ocean Science

    L. Caron;E. R. Ivins;E. Larour;S. Adhikari

  • Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project (ISMIP6) contribution to CMIP6

    Sophie M. J. Nowicki;Anthony Payne;Eric Larour;Helene Seroussi

  • Continued retreat of Thwaites Glacier, West Antarctica, controlled by bed topography and ocean circulation

    H. Seroussi;Y. Nakayama;E. Larour;D. Menemenlis

  • A mass conservation approach for mapping glacier ice thickness

    M. Morlighem;M. Morlighem;E. Rignot;E. Rignot;H. Seroussi;H. Seroussi;E. Larour

  • The future sea-level contribution of the Greenland ice sheet: a multi-model ensemble study of ISMIP6

    Unknown

  • Inversion of basal friction in Antarctica using exact and incomplete adjoints of a higher‐order model

    M. Morlighem;H. Seroussi;E. Larour;E. Rignot;E. Rignot

  • Modeling of Store Gletscher's calving dynamics, West Greenland, in response to ocean thermal forcing

    Mathieu Morlighem;Johannes Bondzio;Johannes Bondzio;Hélène Seroussi;E. Rignot;E. Rignot

  • Dependence of century-scale projections of the Greenland ice sheet on its thermal regime

    H. Seroussi;M. Morlighem;E. Rignot;A. Khazendar

  • Ice flux divergence anomalies on 79north Glacier, Greenland

    H. Seroussi;H. Seroussi;M. Morlighem;M. Morlighem;E. Rignot;E. Rignot;E. Larour

  • Experimental protocol for sea level projections from ISMIP6 stand-alone ice sheet models

    Sophie Nowicki;Heiko Goelzer;Heiko Goelzer;Hélène Seroussi;Anthony J. Payne

  • Understanding of Contemporary Regional Sea-Level Change and the Implications for the Future

    Benjamin D. Hamlington;Alex S. Gardner;Erik Ivins;Jan T.M. Lenaerts

  • Insights into spatial sensitivities of ice mass response to environmental change from the SeaRISE ice sheet modeling project I: Antarctica

    Sophie Nowicki;Robert A. Bindschadler;Ayako Abe-Ouchi;Andy Aschwanden

  • Design and results of the ice sheet model initialisation experiments initMIP-Greenland: an ISMIP6 intercomparison

    Heiko Goelzer;Heiko Goelzer;Sophie Nowicki;Tamsin Edwards;Tamsin Edwards;Matthew Beckley

  • A damage mechanics assessment of the Larsen B ice shelf prior to collapse: Toward a physically-based calving law

    C. P. Borstad;A. Khazendar;E. Larour;M. Morlighem

  • Rheology of the Ronne Ice Shelf, Antarctica, inferred from satellite radar interferometry data using an inverse control method

    Eric Larour;E. Rignot;I. Joughin;Denis Aubry

  • Slowdown in Antarctic mass loss from solid Earth and sea-level feedbacks

    E. Larour;H. Seroussi;S. Adhikari;E.R. Ivins

  • The future sea-level contribution of the Greenland ice sheet: a multi-model ensemble study of ISMIP6

    Heiko Goelzer

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric Rignot
Eric Rignot University of California, Irvine
Mathieu Morlighem
Mathieu Morlighem Dartmouth College
Helene Seroussi
Helene Seroussi Dartmouth College
Erik R. Ivins
Erik R. Ivins California Institute of Technology
Sophie Nowicki
Sophie Nowicki University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Heiko Goelzer
Heiko Goelzer Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research
Angelika Humbert
Angelika Humbert Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Jonathan M. Gregory
Jonathan M. Gregory University of Reading
William H. Lipscomb
William H. Lipscomb National Center for Atmospheric Research
Ayako Abe-Ouchi
Ayako Abe-Ouchi University of Tokyo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways, many of which can be enhanced through complementary online degrees. For instance, pursuing an online degree in Spanish can be a strategic advantage for professionals interested in environmental work involving Spanish-speaking regions, improving communication and collaboration abroad.

Veterans seeking flexible study options will find numerous military friendly online Spanish degree programs, which can complement Earth Science expertise with critical language skills while accommodating the unique needs of servicemembers transitioning into civilian careers.

For those inclined towards creativity and visualization of geological data, integrating an online MFA visual arts can expand career possibilities in scientific illustration, environmental design, and education outreach.

Additionally, leadership roles within environmental organizations often benefit from advanced business knowledge. An human resource management masters degree online can sharpen skills in team management and strategic planning, indispensable for managing multidisciplinary earth science projects effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Eric Larour

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles