World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
5157
World Ranking
9547
National Ranking
417

Elisabeth H. Bos publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elisabeth H. Bos sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 87 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Elisabeth H. Bos D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elisabeth H. Bos sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Elisabeth H. Bos is affiliated with the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple areas within psychology and medicine, with a particular focus on mental health topics. The scientist has contributed extensively to fields such as experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, and psychiatry and mental health.

The main topics in Bos's work include mental health research, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment and cognitive processes, behavioral health and interventions, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, health disparities and outcomes, as well as mental health treatment and access.

Notable recent publications by Elisabeth H. Bos include:

  • Single-Subject Research in Psychiatry: Facts and Fictions (2020, Frontiers in Psychiatry)
  • The bidirectional relationship between anxiety disorders and alcohol use disorders in adults: Findings from a longitudinal population-based study (2022, Journal of Affective Disorders)
  • Seasonality of mood and affect in a large general population sample (2020, PLoS ONE)
  • Exploring temporal relationships among worrying, anxiety, and somatic symptoms (2020, Journal of Psychosomatic Research)
  • Age differences in hedonic adaptation to societal restrictions? Positive and negative affect trajectories during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in 33 nations (2022, Emotion)

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Bos include:

  • Peter de Jonge
  • Ron de Graaf
  • Margreet ten Have
  • Judith G.M. Rosmalen
  • Marij Zuidersma

Publications have appeared in several specialized journals, notably:

  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • PLoS ONE
  • Emotion

The scientist's research contributions are primarily concentrated in psychology and medicine, with fifteen publications in psychology and eight in medicine. Their subfields of study include:

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Applied Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Best Publications

  • Neuroticism and common mental disorders : Meaning and utility of a complex relationship

    Johan Ormel;Bertus F Jeronimus;Roman Kotov;Harriëtte Riese

  • Prognostic association of depression following myocardial infarction with mortality and cardiovascular events: A meta-analysis of 25 years of research

    Anna Meijer;Henk Jan Conradi;Henk Jan Conradi;Elisabeth H. Bos;Brett D. Thombs;Brett D. Thombs

  • The biological and psychological basis of neuroticism: Current status and future directions

    Johan Ormel;A. Bastiaansen;Harriëtte Riese;Elisabeth H. Bos

  • Adjusted prognostic association of depression following myocardial infarction with mortality and cardiovascular events: individual patient data meta-analysis.

    A. Meijer;H. J. Conradi;Elisabeth Bos;M. Anselmino

  • The reciprocity of prosocial behavior and positive affect in daily life.

    Evelien Snippe;Evelien Snippe;Bertus F Jeronimus;Marije Aan Het Rot;Elisabeth H Bos

  • Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Sex Differences in Depression and Prognosis in Persons With Myocardial Infarction: A MINDMAPS Study.

    Frank Doyle;Hannah McGee;Ronán Conroy;Henk Jan Conradi

  • Low-intensity blue-enriched white light (750 lux) and standard bright light (10,000 lux) are equally effective in treating SAD. A randomized controlled study.

    Ybe Meesters;Vera Dekker;Luc J. M. Schlangen;Elisabeth Bos

  • HowNutsAreTheDutch (HoeGekIsNL): A crowdsourcing study of mental symptoms and strengths.

    Lian Van Der Krieke;Bertus F. Jeronimus;Frank J. Blaauw;Frank J. Blaauw;Rob B.K. Wanders

  • Revealing Causal Heterogeneity Using Time Series Analysis of Ambulatory Assessments: Application to the Association Between Depression and Physical Activity After Myocardial Infarction

    Judith G.M. Rosmalen;Angela M.G. Wenting;Annelieke M. Roest;Peter de Jonge

  • The temporal order of change in daily mindfulness and affect during mindfulness-based stress reduction

    Evelien Snippe;Ivan Nyklicek;Maya J. Schroevers;Elisabeth H. Bos

  • Cortisol and α-Amylase Secretion Patterns between and within Depressed and Non-Depressed Individuals

    Sanne H. Booij;Elisabeth H. Bos;Mara E. J. Bouwmans;Martijn van Faassen

  • Affective variability in depression: Revisiting the inertia-instability paradox

    Elisabeth H. Bos;Peter de Jonge;Ralf F. A. Cox

  • Sleep quality predicts positive and negative affect but not vice versa. An electronic diary study in depressed and healthy individuals

    Mara E J Bouwmans;Elisabeth H Bos;H J Rogier Hoenders;Albertine J Oldehinkel

  • Preserving Subjective Wellbeing in the Face of Psychopathology: Buffering Effects of Personal Strengths and Resources

    Elisabeth H Bos;Evelien Snippe;Peter de Jonge;Bertus F Jeronimus

  • A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Dutch Version of Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving for Borderline Personality Disorder

    Elisabeth H. Bos;E. Bas van Wel;Martin T. Appelo;Marc J. P. M. Verbraak

  • A Primrose Path? Moderating Effects of Age and Gender in the Association between Green Space and Mental Health.

    Elisabeth H. Bos;Leon van der Meulen;Marieke Wichers;Bertus F. Jeronimus

  • Temporal Dynamics of Health and Well-Being: A Crowdsourcing Approach to Momentary Assessments and Automated Generation of Personalized Feedback.

    Lian van der Krieke;Frank J Blaauw;Ando C Emerencia;Hendrika M Schenk

  • A Qualitative Approach to Guide Choices for Designing a Diary Study

    Karin A. M. Janssens;Elisabeth H. Bos;Elisabeth H. Bos;Judith G. M. Rosmalen;Marieke C. Wichers

  • An investigation of emotion dynamics in major depressive disorder patients and healthy persons using sparse longitudinal networks.

    Stijn de Vos;Klaas J. Wardenaar;Elisabeth H. Bos;Elisabeth H. Bos;Ernst C. Wit

  • Cognitive, physiological, and personality correlates of recurrence of depression.

    Elisabeth H. Bos;Antoinette L. Bouhuys;Erwin Geerts;Titus W. D. P. van Os

  • Ecological Momentary Assessments and Automated Time Series Analysis to Promote Tailored Health Care: A Proof-of-Principle Study

    Lian van der Krieke;Ando C Emerencia;Elisabeth H Bos;Judith Gm Rosmalen

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter de Jonge
Peter de Jonge University of Groningen
Albertine J. Oldehinkel
Albertine J. Oldehinkel University Medical Center Groningen
Bertus F. Jeronimus
Bertus F. Jeronimus University of Groningen
Judith G.M. Rosmalen
Judith G.M. Rosmalen University Medical Center Groningen
Marieke Wichers
Marieke Wichers Maastricht University
Annelieke M. Roest
Annelieke M. Roest University of Groningen
Johan Ormel
Johan Ormel University Medical Center Groningen
Harriette Riese
Harriette Riese University Medical Center Groningen
Joop T. V. M. de Jong
Joop T. V. M. de Jong University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online psychology degree in the USA has become increasingly popular due to its flexibility and accessibility. Many accredited programs offer a broad range of options tailored to meet your educational and career goals, from undergraduate to graduate levels. This flexibility allows students to balance work, family, and education more easily than traditional on-campus programs.

For those interested in graduate study, Pennsylvania offers some of the easiest psychology master's degree online programs, designed for both recent graduates and working professionals. Meanwhile, students in the Midwest can find several easiest online psychology degrees in the Midwest, providing diverse pathways in clinical and counseling psychology.

Regional options are also available, such as the San Antonio easiest psychology degrees online for Texas-based students seeking affordable and accessible programs. Additionally, the easiest online psychology degree programs in the South offer flexible learning for those based in southern states.

Graduates with online psychology degrees are well-positioned for various career pathways, including mental health services, counseling, human resources, and research. Online education opens new avenues for professional growth and helps prepare students for rewarding roles in both public and private sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Elisabeth H. Bos

Trending Scientists