World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
4636
World Ranking
11359
National Ranking
445

A. Ben Hamza publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where A. Ben Hamza sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 183 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

A. Ben Hamza D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where A. Ben Hamza sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

A. Ben Hamza is affiliated with Concordia University in Canada, with a research focus primarily in the field of Computer Science. Their work extensively covers multiple subfields, including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology, and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics.

The research topics addressed by A. Ben Hamza span various specialized areas:

  • Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Gait Recognition and Analysis

Recent publications showcase a focus on graph networks, anomaly detection, and applications in imaging and smart systems. Notable papers include:

  • "Multi-hop graph transformer network for 3D human pose estimation" (2024), Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation
  • "Regular Splitting Graph Network for 3D Human Pose Estimation" (2023), IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
  • "Graph fairing convolutional networks for anomaly detection" (2023), Pattern Recognition
  • "Classification of Developmental and Brain Disorders via Graph Convolutional Aggregation" (2023), Cognitive Computation
  • "A Federated Learning Approach to Anomaly Detection in Smart Buildings" (2021), ACM Transactions on Internet of Things

A. Ben Hamza frequently collaborates with other researchers, with several coauthors appearing repeatedly in their publications. These include:

  • Mahsa Mesgaran
  • Hasib Zunair
  • Zaedul Islam
  • Ibrahim Salim
  • Raed Abdel-Sater

Their work is published in a wide range of venues, most prominently in arXiv hosted by Cornell University, where they have contributed sixteen publications. Additional publication venues are:

  • Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation
  • IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
  • Pattern Recognition
  • Cognitive Computation

Best Publications

  • Image denoising: a nonlinear robust statistical approach

    A. Ben Hamza;H. Krim

  • A generalized divergence measure for robust image registration

    Yun He;A.B. Hamza;H. Krim

  • Removing Noise and Preserving Details with Relaxed Median Filters

    Unknown

  • Sharp U-Net: Depthwise convolutional network for biomedical image segmentation.

    Hasib Zunair;A. Ben Hamza

  • A multiscale approach to pixel-level image fusion

    A. Ben Hamza;Yun He;Hamid Krim;Alan Willsky

  • Shape Retrieval of Non-rigid 3D Human Models

    D. Pickup;X. Sun;P. L. Rosin;R. R. Martin

  • A multiresolution descriptor for deformable 3D shape retrieval

    Chunyuan Li;A. Ben Hamza

  • Geodesic Object Representation and Recognition

    A. Ben Hamza;Hamid Krim

  • SHREC'14 Track: Shape retrieval of non-rigid 3D human models

    David Pickup;Ralph Robert Martin;Paul L. Rosin;Xianfang Sun

  • Dynamic independent component analysis approach for fault detection and diagnosis

    George Stefatos;A. Ben Hamza

  • A Federated Learning Approach to Anomaly Detection in Smart Buildings

    Raed Abdel Sater;A. Ben Hamza

  • Reconstruction of reflectance spectra using robust nonnegative matrix factorization

    A.B. Hamza;D.J. Brady

  • Image watermarking scheme using nonnegative matrix factorization and wavelet transform

    Mohamed Ouhsain;A. Ben Hamza

  • Unifying probabilistic and variational estimation

    A.B. Hamza;H. Krim;G.B. Unal

  • Melanoma detection using adversarial training and deep transfer learning

    Hasib Zunair;A Ben Hamza

  • Spatially aggregating spectral descriptors for nonrigid 3D shape retrieval: a comparative survey

    Chunyuan Li;A. Ben Hamza

  • Automatic Inpainting Scheme for Video Text Detection and Removal

    A. Mosleh;N. Bouguila;A. B. Hamza

  • Geodesic matching of triangulated surfaces

    A.B. Hamza;H. Krim

  • Image Text Detection Using a Bandlet-Based Edge Detector and Stroke Width Transform.

    Ali Mosleh;Nizar Bouguila;A. Ben Hamza

  • Secret sharing approaches for 3D object encryption

    Esam Elsheh;A. Ben Hamza

  • Geometric Methods in Signal and Image Analysis: Differential geometry of curves and surfaces

    Hamid Krim;Abdessamad Ben Hamza

  • An information divergence measure for ISAR image registration

    A. Ben Hamza;Yun He;H. Krim

  • Intrinsic spatial pyramid matching for deformable 3D shape retrieval

    Chunyuan Li;A. Ben Hamza

  • Information-theoretic hashing of 3D objects using spectral graph theory

    Khaled Tarmissi;A. Ben Hamza

  • MoNuSAC2020: A Multi-organ Nuclei Segmentation and Classification Challenge

    Ruchika Verma;Neeraj Kumar;Abhijeet Patil;Nikhil Cherian Kurian

Frequent Co-Authors

Chunyuan Li
Chunyuan Li Microsoft (United States)
Hamid Krim
Hamid Krim North Carolina State University
Nizar Bouguila
Nizar Bouguila Concordia University
Alexander M. Bronstein
Alexander M. Bronstein Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Michael M. Bronstein
Michael M. Bronstein University of Oxford
Umberto Castellani
Umberto Castellani University of Verona
Ali Mosleh
Ali Mosleh University of California, Los Angeles
Paul L. Rosin
Paul L. Rosin Cardiff University
Junwei Han
Junwei Han Northwestern Polytechnical University
Ralph R. Martin
Ralph R. Martin Cardiff University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options can offer flexibility and open doors to a wide range of career possibilities for computer science students. Many people worry that their past academic performance may limit their choices, but there are excellent college with low gpa opportunities that support diverse student backgrounds and provide a pathway into tech fields.

If you're interested in combining technology with environmental impact, you may also want to look into an online environmental engineering degree science and engineering program, which merges computer science skills with sustainability challenges. Alternatively, see what kind of professional roles are available in related disciplines by reading about what can you do with an environmental studies degree.

For those eager to launch their career sooner, a fast track computer science degree program can help you complete your studies at a quicker pace without sacrificing educational quality. By considering these pathways, you can tailor your educational journey to align with your interests, schedule, and goals.

Best Scientists Citing A. Ben Hamza

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles