World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 51 3876 3658 8 7 148 7881

Eissa Faqeih publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eissa Faqeih between 2005 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eissa Faqeih published across 22 years, from 2005 to 2026, averaging 7.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2017. 6 of the 167 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2017. 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 5 publications 2026: 1 publication
2005 2026

167 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eissa Faqeih: publications per year, 2005 to 2026
Year Publications
2005 2
2006 1
2007 1
2008 3
2009 2
2010 0
2011 3
2012 6
2013 11
2014 10
2015 10
2016 14
2017 19
2018 16
2019 10
2020 13
2021 12
2022 9
2023 9
2024 10
2025 5
2026 1
Total 167
Download as CSV

Eissa Faqeih publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eissa Faqeih sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 145–154 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 148 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193 148
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Eissa Faqeih D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eissa Faqeih sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141 51
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Eissa Faqeih is affiliated with King Fahd Medical City in Saudi Arabia. Their research spans multiple fields predominantly within Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions also in Medicine.

Their work covers a variety of subfields including Molecular Biology, Genetics, Clinical Biochemistry, Physiology, and Cell Biology. These areas align with the main topics of their research, which include:

  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases

Faqeih has published extensively, with a number of papers appearing in prominent venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Nature Communications
  • Genetics in Medicine
  • Genome Medicine
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Faqeih include:

  • "NEMF mutations that impair ribosome-associated quality control are associated with neuromuscular disease," 2020, Nature Communications
  • "DALRD3 encodes a protein mutated in epileptic encephalopathy that targets arginine tRNAs for 3-methylcytosine modification," 2020, Nature Communications
  • "Loss-of-function mutations in UDP-Glucose 6-Dehydrogenase cause recessive developmental epileptic encephalopathy," 2020, Nature Communications
  • "Diagnostic implications of pitfalls in causal variant identification based on 4577 molecularly characterized families," 2023, Nature Communications
  • "Categorized Genetic Analysis in Childhood-Onset Cardiomyopathy," 2020, Circulation Genomic and Precision Medicine

Faqeih frequently collaborates with other researchers, including:

  • Fowzan S. Alkuraya
  • Fuad Al Mutairi
  • Majid Alfadhel
  • Mohammed Almannai
  • Naif A. M. Almontashiri

Best Publications

  • Accelerating novel candidate gene discovery in neurogenetic disorders via whole-exome sequencing of prescreened multiplex consanguineous families.

    Anas M. Alazami;Nisha Patel;Hanan E. Shamseldin;Shamsa Anazi

  • The landscape of genetic diseases in Saudi Arabia based on the first 1000 diagnostic panels and exomes.

    Dorota Monies;Mohamed Abouelhoda;Moeenaldeen AlSayed;Zuhair Alhassnan

  • Clinical genomics expands the morbid genome of intellectual disability and offers a high diagnostic yield

    S Anazi;S Maddirevula;E Faqeih;H Alsedairy

  • Mutations in FBXL4 Cause Mitochondrial Encephalopathy and a Disorder of Mitochondrial DNA Maintenance

    Penelope E. Bonnen;John W. Yarham;Arnaud Besse;Ping Wu

  • Genomic analysis of primordial dwarfism reveals novel disease genes

    Ranad Shaheen;Eissa Faqeih;Shinu Ansari;Ghada Abdel-Salam

  • Study of autosomal recessive osteogenesis imperfecta in Arabia reveals a novel locus defined by TMEM38B mutation.

    Ranad Shaheen;Anas M Alazami;Muneera J Alshammari;Eissa Faqeih

  • Recessive Mutations in DOCK6, Encoding the Guanidine Nucleotide Exchange Factor DOCK6, Lead to Abnormal Actin Cytoskeleton Organization and Adams-Oliver Syndrome

    Ranad Shaheen;Eissa Faqeih;Asma Sunker;Heba Morsy

  • Expanding the genetic heterogeneity of intellectual disability.

    Shams Anazi;Sateesh Maddirevula;Vincenzo Salpietro;Yasmine T. Asi

  • Characterizing the morbid genome of ciliopathies

    Ranad Shaheen;Katarzyna Szymanska;Basudha Basu;Nisha Patel

  • In search of triallelism in Bardet–Biedl syndrome

    Leen Abu-Safieh;Shamsa Al-Anazi;Lama Al-Abdi;Mais Hashem

  • A homozygous truncating mutation in PUS3 expands the role of tRNA modification in normal cognition.

    Ranad Shaheen;Lu Han;Eissa Faqeih;Nour Ewida

  • The genetic landscape of familial congenital hydrocephalus.

    Ranad Shaheen;Mohammed Adeeb Sebai;Nisha Patel;Nour Ewida

  • Bi-allelic Alterations in AEBP1 Lead to Defective Collagen Assembly and Connective Tissue Structure Resulting in a Variant of Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome

    Patrick R. Blackburn;Zhi Xu;Kathleen E. Tumelty;Rose W. Zhao

  • Mutations in EOGT Confirm the Genetic Heterogeneity of Autosomal-Recessive Adams-Oliver Syndrome

    Ranad Shaheen;Mona Aglan;Kim Keppler-Noreuil;Eissa Faqeih

  • Expanding the clinical and genetic heterogeneity of hereditary disorders of connective tissue.

    Anas M. Alazami;Sarah M. Al-Qattan;Eissa Faqeih;Amal Alhashem

  • AMPD2 Regulates GTP Synthesis and Is Mutated in a Potentially Treatable Neurodegenerative Brainstem Disorder

    Naiara Akizu;Vincent Cantagrel;Jana Schroth;Na Cai

  • Molecular autopsy in maternal–fetal medicine

    Hanan E Shamseldin;Wesam Kurdi;Fatima Almusafri;Maha Alnemer

  • ISCA2 mutation causes infantile neurodegenerative mitochondrial disorder

    Zuhair N Al-Hassnan;Mazhor Al-Dosary;Majid Alfadhel;Eissa A Faqeih

  • Expanded Newborn Screening Program in Saudi Arabia: Incidence of screened disorders

    Majid Alfadhel;Majid Alfadhel;Majid Alfadhel;Ali Al Othaim;Ali Al Othaim;Ali Al Othaim;Saif Al Saif;Saif Al Saif;Saif Al Saif;Fuad Al Mutairi;Fuad Al Mutairi;Fuad Al Mutairi

  • Exome sequencing in mostly consanguineous Arab families with neurologic disease provides a high potential molecular diagnosis rate

    Wu Lin Charng;Wu Lin Charng;Ender Karaca;Ender Karaca;Zeynep Coban Akdemir;Zeynep Coban Akdemir;Tomasz Gambin;Tomasz Gambin

Frequent Co-Authors

Fowzan S. Alkuraya
Fowzan S. Alkuraya Alfaisal University
Ranad Shaheen
Ranad Shaheen King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre
Mustafa A. Salih
Mustafa A. Salih King Saud University
Stefan T. Arold
Stefan T. Arold King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Maha S. Zaki
Maha S. Zaki National Research Centre, Egypt
Joseph G. Gleeson
Joseph G. Gleeson University of California, San Diego
Lee-Jun C. Wong
Lee-Jun C. Wong Baylor College of Medicine
Jill A. Rosenfeld
Jill A. Rosenfeld Baylor College of Medicine
Clare V. Logan
Clare V. Logan University of Edinburgh
Jennifer E. Posey
Jennifer E. Posey Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Genetics opens doors to a diverse range of online education and career options. Many students interested in healthcare administration fields find value in online medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa, making education more accessible and affordable.

For those eager to accelerate their studies and enter the workforce sooner, enrolling in a fast track program can be a smart choice. These programs allow motivated students to complete degrees in less time than traditional pathways.

Flexibility is another important factor. Many learners balance work, life, and study, which is why enrolling in a self paced online college is increasingly popular. This approach gives students control over their own learning schedules.

Applying to universities no longer has to be costly or complicated. Prospective students can consider no application fee universities to remove financial barriers and get started with their education journey sooner.

Best Scientists Citing Eissa Faqeih

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles