World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
47
Citations
8264
World Ranking
6446
National Ranking
2802

David T. Wong publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David T. Wong sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 96 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

David T. Wong D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David T. Wong sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Prozac (fluoxetine, Lilly 110140), the first selective serotonin uptake inhibitor and an antidepressant drug: twenty years since its first publication.

    David T. Wong;Frank P. Bymaster;Eric A. Engleman

  • A selective inhibitor of serotonin uptake: Lilly 110140, 3-(p-trifluoromethylphenoxy)-N-methyl-3-phenylpropylamine.

    David T. Wong;Jong S. Horng;Frank P. Bymaster;Kenneth L. Hauser

  • Fluoxetine, but not other selective serotonin uptake inhibitors, increases norepinephrine and dopamine extracellular levels in prefrontal cortex

    Frank P. Bymaster;Wei Zhang;Petra A. Carter;Janice Shaw

  • LY248686, A New Inhibitor of Serotonin and Norepinephrine Uptake

    David T. Wong;Frank P. Bymaster;Douglas A. Mayle;Leroy R. Reid

  • 3-aryloxy-3-substituted propanamines

    David Wayne Robertson;David Taiwai Wong;Joseph Herman Krushinski

  • Olanzapine increases in vivo dopamine and norepinephrine release in rat prefrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens and striatum

    Xi-Ming Li;Kenneth W. Perry;David T. Wong;F. P. Bymaster

  • Fluoxetine, a selective inhibitor of serotonin uptake

    Ray W. Fuller;David T. Wong;David W. Robertson

  • Serotonin uptake and serotonin uptake inhibition.

    Ray W. Fuller;David T. Wong

  • Influence of fluoxetine on the ability of bupropion to modulate extracellular dopamine and norepinephrine concentrations in three mesocorticolimbic areas of rats.

    Simon Xi-Ming Li;Kenneth W Perry;David T Wong

  • Compounds having effects on serotonin-related systems

    James Edmund Audia;David J. Hibschman;Joseph Herman Krushinski;Thomas Edward Mabry

  • Chronic dietary pergolide preserves nigrostriatal neuronal integrity in aged-Fischer-344 rats.

    David L. Felten;Suzanne Y. Felten;Ray W. Fuller;Tracy D. Romano

  • Kinetics of serotonin accumulation into synaptosomes of rat brain--effects of amphetamine and chloroamphetamines.

    David T. Wong;Jong-Sin Horng;Ray W. Fuller

  • Localization of 5-HT3 receptors in the rat brain using [3H]LY278584.

    Donald R. Gehlert;Susan L. Gackenheimer;David T. Wong;David W. Robertson

  • Duloxetine (Cymbalta), a dual inhibitor of serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake.

    F.P. Bymaster;E.E. Beedle;J. Findlay;P.T. Gallagher

  • Enhancement of fluoxetine-dependent increase of extracellular serotonin (5-HT) levels by (-)-pindolol, an antagonist at 5-HT1A receptors.

    Laura J. Dreshfield;David T. Wong;Kenneth W. Perry;Eric A. Engleman

  • Potentiation of drug response

    David Taiwai Wong;Juan Ignacio Oguiza

  • Affinities of fluoxetine, its enantiomers, and other inhibitors of serotonin uptake for subtypes of serotonin receptors.

    Wong Dt;Threlkeld Pg;Robertson Dw

  • Importance of duration of drug action in the antagonism of p-chloroamphetamine depletion of brain serotonin—comparison of fluoxetine and chlorimipramine

    Ray W. Fuller;Harold D. Snoddy;Kenneth W. Perry;Frank P. Bymaster

  • Chronic effects of fluoxetine, a selective inhibitor of serotonin uptake, on neurotransmitter receptors

    D. T. Wong;L. R. Reid;F. P. Bymaster;Penny G. Threlkeld

  • Suppression of food intake in rats by fluoxetine: comparison of enantiomers and effects of serotonin antagonists.

    David T. Wong;Leroy R. Reid;Penny G. Threlkeld

  • dl-N-methyl-3-(o-methoxyphenoxy)-3-phenylpropylamine hydrochloride, Lilly 94939, a potent inhibitor for uptake of norepinephrine into rat brain synaptosomes and heart.

    David T. Wong;Jong S. Horng;Frank P. Bymaster

Frequent Co-Authors

Ray W. Fuller
Ray W. Fuller Eli Lilly (United States)
Ting-Kai Li
Ting-Kai Li Duke University
David Robertson
David Robertson Vanderbilt University
Raymond C. Rosen
Raymond C. Rosen New England Research Institutes
Gary D. Tollefson
Gary D. Tollefson Eli Lilly (United States)
Claus G. Roehrborn
Claus G. Roehrborn The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Sarah F. Leibowitz
Sarah F. Leibowitz Rockefeller University
Daniel R. Weinberger
Daniel R. Weinberger Johns Hopkins University
Joel E. Kleinman
Joel E. Kleinman Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing neuroscience opens up a range of opportunities in healthcare, research, and counseling. If you're considering expanding your expertise, several online psy d programs offer specialized training for those interested in clinical practice or neuropsychology.

Another fast-growing field is marriage and family therapy. For those seeking a shorter educational path, there are lmft programs available online, helping students become licensed therapists in less time.

For undergraduates eager to step into their neuroscience careers sooner, consider exploring accelerated programs. These condensed degrees can help you complete your studies quickly while maintaining educational quality.

Many neuroscience students also evaluate their long-term earning potential. Looking into the top degrees in the world can help guide your decisions on academic focus and future career advancement.

Best Scientists Citing David T. Wong

Recently Published Articles