World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
64
Citations
13892
World Ranking
9725
National Ranking
4282

Ray W. Fuller publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ray W. Fuller sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 315 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Ray W. Fuller D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ray W. Fuller sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ray W. Fuller was primarily affiliated with Eli Lilly in the United States throughout their career. Their research work was situated within the field of Environmental Science, contributing extensively to areas such as Ecology, Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis.

The scientist explored a diverse set of main topics including Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Avian Ecology and Behavior, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Urban Green Space and Health, Animal and Plant Science Education, and Plant and Animal Studies.

Fuller had numerous collaborations with other researchers, frequently co-authoring works with:

  • Tatsuya Amano
  • Shawan Chowdhury
  • James Watson
  • Rachel Rui Ying Oh
  • Bradley K. Woodworth

Their publications appeared regularly in several scientific venues. The most frequent venues for their work included:

  • Conservation Biology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • People and Nature
  • Biological Conservation
  • Global Ecology and Conservation

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Ray W. Fuller include:

  • Protected areas have a mixed impact on waterbirds, but management helps, 2022, Nature
  • Urban green space use during a time of stress: A case study during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brisbane, Australia, 2021, People and Nature
  • Global conservation of species' niches, 2020, Nature
  • Integrating solutions to adapt cities for climate change, 2021, The Lancet Planetary Health
  • Life satisfaction linked to the diversity of nature experiences and nature views from the window, 2020, Landscape and Urban Planning

Best Publications

  • Vasopressin/Serotonin Interactions in the Anterior Hypothalamus Control Aggressive Behavior in Golden Hamsters

    Craig F. Ferris;Richard H. Melloni;Gary Koppel;Kenneth W. Perry

  • Uptake inhibitors increase extracellular serotonin concentration measured by brain microdialysis

    Ray W. Fuller

  • Effect of fluoxetine on serotonin and dopamine concentration in microdialysis fluid from rat striatum

    Kenneth W. Perry;Ray W. Fuller

  • Dopamine deficiency in the weaver mutant mouse

    M. J. Schmidt;B. D. Sawyer;K. W. Perry;R. W. Fuller

  • Effect of an uptake inhibitor on serotonin metabolism in rat brain: Studies with 3-(p-trifluoromethylphenoxy)-n-methyl-3-phenylpropylamine (Lilly 110140)

    Ray W. Fuller;Kenneth W. Perry;Bryan B. Molloy

  • Evidence for 5-HT2 receptors mediating contraction in vascular smooth muscle.

    M L Cohen;R W Fuller;K S Wiley

  • Fluoxetine, a selective inhibitor of serotonin uptake

    Ray W. Fuller;David T. Wong;David W. Robertson

  • Serotonergic stimulation of pituitary-adrenocortical function in rats.

    Ray W. Fuller

  • Absolute configurations and pharmacological activities of the optical isomers of fluoxetine, a selective serotonin-uptake inhibitor.

    D W Robertson;J H Krushinski;R W Fuller;J D Leander

  • Serotonin uptake and serotonin uptake inhibition.

    Ray W. Fuller;David T. Wong

  • Mechanisms of effects of d-fenfluramine on brain serotonin metabolism in rats: uptake inhibition versus release.

    Ray W. Fuller;Harold D. Snoddy;David W. Robertson

  • Chronic dietary pergolide preserves nigrostriatal neuronal integrity in aged-Fischer-344 rats.

    David L. Felten;Suzanne Y. Felten;Ray W. Fuller;Tracy D. Romano

  • Neurochemical evidence for antagonism by olanzapine of dopamine, serotonin, α1-adrenergic and muscarinic receptors in vivo in rats

    F. P. Bymaster;S. K. Hemrick-Luecke;K. W. Perry;R. W. Fuller

  • Disposition and pharmacological effects of m-Chlorophenylpiperazine in rats

    R.W. Fuller;H.D. Snoddy;N.R. Mason;J.E. Owen

  • NMDA receptor antagonists suppress behaviors but not norepinephrine turnover or locus coeruleus unit activity induced by opiate withdrawal.

    Kurt Rasmussen;Ray W. Fuller;Marsha E. Stockton;Kenneth W. Perry

  • Resolution and absolute configuration of an ergoline-related dopamine agonist, trans-4,4a,5,6,7,8,8a,9-Octahydro-5-propyl-1H(or 2H)-pyrazolo[3,4-g]quinoline

    Titus Rd;Kornfeld Ec;Jones Nd;Clemens Ja

  • LOWERING OF BRAIN SEROTONIN LEVEL BY CHLORAMPHETAMINES.

    Ray W. Fuller;C.W. Hines;J. Mills

  • Kinetics of serotonin accumulation into synaptosomes of rat brain--effects of amphetamine and chloroamphetamines.

    David T. Wong;Jong-Sin Horng;Ray W. Fuller

  • Long-lasting depletion of striatal dopamine by a single injection of amphetamine in iprindole-treated rats

    Ray W. Fuller;Susan Hemrick-Luecke

  • LY53857, a selective and potent serotonergic (5-HT2) receptor antagonist, does not lower blood pressure in the spontaneously hypertensive rat.

    M L Cohen;R W Fuller;K D Kurz

Frequent Co-Authors

David T. Wong
David T. Wong University of California, Los Angeles
Richard M. Kostrzewa
Richard M. Kostrzewa East Tennessee State University
David T.W. Wong
David T.W. Wong University of California, Los Angeles
Bernardino Ghetti
Bernardino Ghetti Indiana University
Suzanne Y. Felten
Suzanne Y. Felten University of Rochester
Richard E. Heikkila
Richard E. Heikkila Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Paul L. Ornstein
Paul L. Ornstein Eli Lilly and Company
David L. Felten
David L. Felten University of Medicine and Health Sciences
John I. Nurnberger
John I. Nurnberger Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA, consider the wide range of online degree options and career pathways available in the health sciences. Many students combine their foundational science knowledge with a specialization, leading to rewarding roles in healthcare and research settings.

If you are passionate about health and wellness, enrolling in one of the best online nutrition programs can open doors to careers in dietetics, nutrition consulting, or public health. For those aiming at healthcare management, cahme accredited mha programs offer essential leadership training for hospital and clinic administration.

Many professionals also advance with online doctoral programs. If you’re interested in nursing, options like a dnp program no clinical provide flexibility, focusing on leadership and policy without in-person requirements. For broader administrative roles, consider online doctoral programs healthcare administration, which prepare graduates for upper-level leadership, policy, or academic careers.

These online degrees enable you to tailor your path and take advantage of diverse career opportunities in healthcare, biosciences, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Ray W. Fuller

Recently Published Articles