World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
51
Citations
10871
World Ranking
17064
National Ranking
7035

David M. Miller publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Miller sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 113 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

David M. Miller D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Miller sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

David M. Miller is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States. Their research spans multiple interconnected areas within biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, focusing notably on molecular biology, aging, endocrine and autonomic systems, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and physiology.

Their work has contributed to several key topics in contemporary biology, including:

  • Genetics, aging, and longevity in model organisms
  • Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • RNA research and splicing
  • Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • CRISPR and genetic engineering
  • Neurobiology and insect physiology research
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research

David M. Miller has authored numerous publications, with some recently published papers including:

  • "Molecular topography of an entire nervous system," 2021, Cell
  • "The neuropeptidergic connectome of C. elegans," 2023, Neuron
  • "Molecular topography of an entire nervous system," 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "In silico analysis of the transcriptional regulatory logic of neuronal identity specification throughout the C. elegans nervous system," 2021, eLife
  • "A molecular atlas of adult C. elegans motor neurons reveals ancient diversity delineated by conserved transcription factor codes," 2024, Cell Reports

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Miller include:

  • Seth R. Taylor
  • Alexis Weinreb
  • Marc Hammarlund
  • Rebecca McWhirter
  • Alec Barrett

Miller's research has been published in a variety of academic venues. Common publication platforms include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Cell Reports
  • Nature Communications
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Cell

Their body of work particularly addresses molecular and cellular aspects of nervous system biology and aging, integrating genetic and transcriptomic approaches to understand physiological mechanisms and cellular diversity. This includes detailed studies on nervous system molecular topography and the neuropeptidergic connectome, as well as the application of computational models to transcriptional regulatory networks in neuronal identity.

Best Publications

  • Integrative analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome by the modENCODE project

    Mark B. Gerstein;Zhi John Lu;Eric L. Van Nostrand;Chao Cheng

  • Molecular topography of an entire nervous system.

    Seth R. Taylor;Gabriel Santpere;Gabriel Santpere;Alexis Weinreb;Alec Barrett

  • Small-molecule inhibition of Wnt signaling through activation of casein kinase 1α

    Curtis A Thorne;Alison J Hanson;Judsen Schneider;Emilios Tahinci

  • Neurotoxin-induced degeneration of dopamine neurons in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Richard Nass;David H. Hall;David M. Miller;Randy D. Blakely

  • Time-lapse imaging and cell-specific expression profiling reveal dynamic branching and molecular determinants of a multi-dendritic nociceptor in C. elegans

    Cody J. Smith;Joseph D. Watson;W. Clay Spencer;Tim O'Brien

  • Differential localization of two myosins within nematode thick filaments

    David M. Miller;Irving Ortiz;Gary C. Berliner;Henry F. Epstein

  • Comparative analysis of the transcriptome across distant species

    Mark B. Gerstein;Joel Rozowsky;Koon Kiu Yan;Daifeng Wang

  • A spatial and temporal map of C. elegans gene expression

    W. Clay Spencer;Georg Zeller;Joseph D. Watson;Stefan R. Henz

  • Specific roles for DEG/ENaC and TRP channels in touch and thermosensation in C. elegans nociceptors.

    Marios Chatzigeorgiou;Sungjae Yoo;Joseph D. Watson;Wei Hsiang Lee

  • A Primary Culture System for Functional Analysis of C. elegans Neurons and Muscle Cells

    Michael Christensen;Ana Estevez;Xiaoyan Yin;Rebecca Fox

  • Chapter 16 Immunofluorescence Microscopy

    David M. Miller;Diane C. Shakes

  • The Caenorhabditis elegans Gene T23G5.5 Encodes an Antidepressant- and Cocaine-Sensitive Dopamine Transporter

    Jayanthi Ld;Apparsundaram S;Malone;Ward E

  • C. elegans unc-4 gene encodes a homeodomain protein that determines the pattern of synaptic input to specific motor neurons.

    David M. Miller;Michael M. Shen;Michael M. Shen;Caroline E. Shamu;Caroline E. Shamu;Thomas R. Bürglin

  • acr-16 encodes an essential subunit of the levamisole-resistant nicotinic receptor at the Caenorhabditis elegans neuromuscular junction.

    Denis Touroutine;Rebecca M. Fox;Stephen E. Von Stetina;Anna Burdina

  • C. elegans multi-dendritic sensory neurons: Morphology and function

    Adi Albeg;Cody J. Smith;Marios Chatzigeorgiou;Dror G. Feitelson

  • Immunological identification of the genes encoding the four myosin heavy chain isoforms of Caenorhabditis elegans.

    David M. Miller;Frank E. Stockdale;Jonathan Karn

  • A gene expression fingerprint of C. elegans embryonic motor neurons

    Rebecca M Fox;Stephen E Von Stetina;Susan J Barlow;Christian Shaffer

  • Cell-specific microarray profiling experiments reveal a comprehensive picture of gene expression in the C. elegans nervous system

    Stephen E Von Stetina;Joseph D Watson;Rebecca M Fox;Rebecca M Fox;Kellen L Olszewski;Kellen L Olszewski

  • The Groucho-like transcription factor UNC-37 functions with the neural specificity gene unc-4 to govern motor neuron identity in C. elegans

    A. Pflugrad;J. Y.-J. Meir;T. M. Barnes;D. M. Miller

  • UNC-4/UNC-37-dependent repression of motor neuron-specific genes controls synaptic choice in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Angela R. Winnier;James Y.-J. Meir;Jennifer M. Ross;Nektarios Tavernarakis

Frequent Co-Authors

Mei Zhen
Mei Zhen Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
Alexander Gottschalk
Alexander Gottschalk Michigan State University
Oliver Hobert
Oliver Hobert Columbia University
Nenad Sestan
Nenad Sestan Yale University
Randy D. Blakely
Randy D. Blakely Florida Atlantic University
Ralf Schnabel
Ralf Schnabel Technische Universität Braunschweig
LaDeana W. Hillier
LaDeana W. Hillier University of Washington
Aravinthan D. T. Samuel
Aravinthan D. T. Samuel Harvard University
Chao Cheng
Chao Cheng Baylor College of Medicine
Frank J. Slack
Frank J. Slack Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a background in Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to diverse and rewarding careers within the health and life sciences fields. Many students consider switching paths or advancing their careers with flexible, high-quality online programs.

For those interested in a fast entry into healthcare, a popular choice is pursuing cma to lpn programs, which let certified medical assistants advance to licensed practical nursing roles online. Similarly, online nursing programs provide a flexible route to becoming a registered nurse, perfect for those seeking patient-facing roles with strong job prospects.

If your interests lie in the scientific foundation of life, consider online biology degrees that offer an accelerated pace and the opportunity to specialize in areas like genetics or environmental biology. For those passionate about health and nutrition, earning an online nutrition degree is a great pathway into dietetics or wellness coaching.

Whatever your goals, these online degree options make it easier to gain credentials and skills—providing pathways to fulfilling careers throughout the healthcare and scientific sectors.

Best Scientists Citing David M. Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles