World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
100
Citations
32705
World Ranking
8339
National Ranking
319

David Locker publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Locker sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 247 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David Locker D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Locker sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Locker is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and has a research focus primarily in the field of Engineering. Their work spans several subfields, including Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, and General Materials Science.

Their research topics cover a range of areas related to materials and electronic systems, with a particular emphasis on Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies. Other important themes in their work include 3D IC and TSV technologies, Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis, Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties, Radiation Effects in Electronics, Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties, and Powder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials.

David Locker has contributed to multiple publication venues, with frequent appearances in the Journal of Electronic Packaging, the 2022 21st IEEE Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (iTherm), and the 2022 International Conference on Electronics Packaging (ICEP).

Their recent papers include:

  • Evolution of Anand Parameters for Thermally Aged Sn-Ag-Cu Lead-Free Alloys at Low Operating Temperature (2022), Journal of Electronic Packaging
  • High Strain Rate Mechanical Properties of SAC-Q With Sustained Elevated Temperature Storage at 100 °C (2020), Journal of Electronic Packaging
  • Evolution of Anand Parameters With Elevated Temperature Aging for SnAgCu Lead-free Alloys (2020), Journal of Electronic Packaging
  • Low temperature interconnects in 1st level packaging and its challenges (2022), 2022 International Conference on Electronics Packaging (ICEP)
  • High Strain Rate Materials Characterization at Low Test Temperatures for Thermally Aged SAC-Q Solder Alloys (2022), 2022 21st IEEE Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (iTherm)

Collaborations feature prominently in their work, with frequent co-authors including Pradeep Lall, Jeff Suhling, Vikas Yadav, Charles Arvin, and Sze Pei Lim.

Best Publications

  • Measuring oral health: a conceptual framework.

    Locker D

  • Validity and Reliability of a Questionnaire for Measuring Child Oral-health-related Quality of Life

    A. Jokovic;D. Locker;M. Stephens;D. Kenny

  • What do measures of ‘oral health-related quality of life’ measure?

    David Locker;Finbarr Allen

  • Is dental health education effective? A systematic review of current evidence

    E. J. Kay;D. Locker

  • Age of Onset of Dental Anxiety

    David Locker;A Liddell;L Dempster;D Shapiro

  • Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population.

    Manal A Awad;James P Lund;Stanley H Shapiro;David Locker

  • Oral and general health‐related quality of life with conventional and implant dentures

    Guido Heydecke;David Locker;Manal A. Awad;James P. Lund;James P. Lund

  • Quality of life: a dynamic construct.

    P.J. Allison;D. Locker;J.S. Feine

  • A systematic review of the effectiveness of health promotion aimed at improving oral health.

    E Kay;D Locker

  • Deprivation and oral health: a review.

    D. Locker

  • Measuring the Effect of Intra-oral Implant Rehabilitation on Health-related Quality of Life in a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

    M.A. Awad;D. Locker;N. Korner-Bitensky;J.S. Feine

  • A modified short version of the oral health impact profile for assessing health-related quality of life in edentulous adults.

    Finbarr Allen;David Locker

  • Questionnaire for measuring oral health-related quality of life in eight- to ten-year-old children.

    Aleksandra Jokovic;D Locker;B Tompson;G Guyatt

  • Self-perceived Oral Health Status, Psychological Well-being, and Life Satisfaction in an Older Adult Population

    D. Locker;M. Clarke;B. Payne

  • Assessing the responsiveness of measures of oral health‐related quality of life

    David Locker;Aleksandra Jokovic;Martha Clarke

  • Comparison of the GOHAI and OHIP-14 as measures of the oral health-related quality of life of the elderly.

    David Locker;David Matear;Marlene Stephens;Herenia Lawrence

  • Short forms of the Child Perceptions Questionnaire for 11–14-year-old children (CPQ11–14): Development and initial evaluation

    Aleksandra Jokovic;David Locker;Gordan Guyatt

  • Variations in the Social Impact of Oral Conditions Among Older Adults in South Australia, Ontario, and North Carolina

    G.D. Slade;A.J. Spencer;D. Locker;R.J. Hunt

  • Validation of the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ 11-14).

    L.A. Foster Page;W.M. Thomson;A. Jokovic;D. Locker

  • Association between clinical and subjective indicators of oral health status in an older adult population

    David Locker;Gary Slade

Frequent Co-Authors

Richie Poulton
Richie Poulton University of Otago
Gary D. Slade
Gary D. Slade University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
David L. Streiner
David L. Streiner University of Toronto
Nancy R. Kressin
Nancy R. Kressin Boston University
Gordon H. Guyatt
Gordon H. Guyatt McMaster University
James D. Beck
James D. Beck University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Paul B. Pencharz
Paul B. Pencharz University of Toronto
Michael Glogauer
Michael Glogauer University of Toronto
Karen E. Waldie
Karen E. Waldie University of Auckland
Sheila M. Williams
Sheila M. Williams University of Otago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in medicine opens the door to many related fields, especially for those interested in health without becoming a physician. One fast-growing option is healthcare management. Accredited healthcare administration degree programs prepare students for leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and other healthcare organizations. Many of these programs are offered online, making them accessible for busy students and working professionals.

For registered nurses looking to advance their careers, rn to fnp programs offer specialized training to become Family Nurse Practitioners. These bridge programs are ideal for those with previous nursing experience who want to provide primary care and expand their practice options.

Those interested in preventive care and wellness may consider an online degree in nutrition. Graduates can pursue roles such as nutritionists, dietitians, or health educators, helping patients make informed dietary decisions.

Lastly, aspiring healthcare administrators often seek advanced degrees like the online mha programs cahme accredited. These master’s programs equip graduates with in-depth knowledge of hospital operations, finance, and healthcare policy, preparing them for executive roles.

Best Scientists Citing David Locker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles