What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Ecology
- Paleontology
- Archaeology
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Plateau, Holocene, Ecology, Archaeology and Pleistocene.
His Plateau study combines topics in areas such as Colonization, Upper Paleolithic, Climate change and Monsoon.
His Monsoon research integrates issues from Arid and Holocene climatic optimum.
David B. Madsen combines subjects such as East Asian Monsoon, Steppe, Environmental change, Shore and Quaternary with his study of Holocene.
His work is dedicated to discovering how East Asian Monsoon, Structural basin are connected with Resource and other disciplines.
His Pleistocene research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Loess plateau, Mammal, Domestication, Mesolithic and Qinghai lake.
His most cited work include:
- Holocene moisture evolution in arid central Asia and its out-of-phase relationship with Asian monsoon history (692 citations)
- Mass collecting and the diet breadth model: A Great Basin example (136 citations)
- Age constraints on the late Quaternary evolution of Qinghai Lake, Tibetan Plateau (109 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His main research concerns Holocene, Plateau, Physical geography, Structural basin and Archaeology.
His research integrates issues of Arid, Ecology, Pleistocene, Quaternary and Shore in his study of Holocene.
His work in Arid addresses subjects such as Climate change, which are connected to disciplines such as Marine isotope stage.
His work deals with themes such as Domestication and East Asian Monsoon, which intersect with Plateau.
His Physical geography research includes elements of Glacial period, Climatology, Monsoon, Thermoluminescence dating and Qinghai tibetan plateau.
His Structural basin study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Geochemistry, Cave, Marine Isotope Stage 5 and Optically stimulated luminescence.
He most often published in these fields:
- Holocene (53.47%)
- Plateau (35.64%)
- Physical geography (33.66%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?
- Holocene (53.47%)
- Plateau (35.64%)
- Physical geography (33.66%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of investigation include Holocene, Plateau, Physical geography, Structural basin and Upper Paleolithic.
In his research, David B. Madsen performs multidisciplinary study on Holocene and Solar irradiance.
The concepts of his Plateau study are interwoven with issues in Pleistocene, Interglacial, Westerlies, Monsoon and Chronology.
His work carried out in the field of Physical geography brings together such families of science as Arid and Thermoluminescence dating.
His Structural basin study incorporates themes from Coprophilous fungi, Human settlement and Qinghai tibetan plateau.
His Upper Paleolithic study necessitates a more in-depth grasp of Archaeology.
Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Late Upper Paleolithic occupation at Cooper's Ferry, Idaho, USA, ~16,000 years ago. (43 citations)
- A Tianshan Mountains loess-paleosol sequence indicates anti-phase climatic variations in arid central Asia and in East Asia (23 citations)
- Dust Storm Outbreak in Central Asia After ~3.5 kyr BP (12 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Ecology
- Paleontology
- Archaeology
His scientific interests lie mostly in Plateau, Chronology, Arid, Physical geography and Holocene.
His Plateau research incorporates themes from Karst, Paleontology and Pleistocene.
The various areas that David B. Madsen examines in his Chronology study include Structural basin, Sequence, Paleosol and East Asia.
David B. Madsen has researched Arid in several fields, including Westerlies, Monsoon and Marine isotope stage, Interglacial.
His Physical geography study frequently intersects with other fields, such as Loess.
David B. Madsen has included themes like Northern Hemisphere, Dust storm and Zonal and meridional in his Holocene study.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
