World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Animal Science and Veterinary

D-Index
41
Citations
5362
World Ranking
1113
National Ranking
329

Daniela Lourenco publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniela Lourenco sits on this spectrum.

29–33 publications: 1 scientists 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29 publications 442+

This scientist: 316 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

Daniela Lourenco D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniela Lourenco sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Genetic evaluation using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in American Angus.

    D. A. L. Lourenco;S. Tsuruta;B. O. Fragomeni;Y. Masuda

  • Weighting Strategies for Single-Step Genomic BLUP: An Iterative Approach for Accurate Calculation of GEBV and GWAS.

    Xinyue Zhang;Daniela Lourenco;Ignacio Aguilar;Andres Legarra

  • Frequentist p-values for large-scale-single step genome-wide association, with an application to birth weight in American Angus cattle

    Ignacio Aguilar;Andres Legarra;Fernando Cardoso;Fernando Cardoso;Yutaka Masuda

  • Current status of genomic evaluation.

    Ignacy Misztal;Daniela Lourenco;Andres Legarra

  • Single-Step Genomic Evaluations from Theory to Practice: Using SNP Chips and Sequence Data in BLUPF90.

    Daniela Lourenco;Andres Legarra;Shogo Tsuruta;Yutaka Masuda

  • The Dimensionality of Genomic Information and Its Effect on Genomic Prediction.

    Ivan Pocrnic;Daniela A L Lourenco;Yutaka Masuda;Andres Legarra

  • Accurate genomic predictions for BCWD resistance in rainbow trout are achieved using low-density SNP panels: Evidence that long-range LD is a major contributing factor.

    Unknown

  • Incorporation of causative quantitative trait nucleotides in single-step GBLUP

    Breno O. Fragomeni;Daniela A. L. Lourenco;Yutaka Masuda;Andres Legarra

  • Changes in genetic trends in US dairy cattle since the implementation of genomic selection.

    Unknown

  • Accuracy of estimated breeding values with genomic information on males, females, or both: an example on broiler chicken

    Daniela A. L. Lourenco;Breno O. Fragomeni;Shogo Tsuruta;Ignacio Aguilar

  • Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses

    D.A.L. Lourenco;I. Misztal;S. Tsuruta;I. Aguilar

  • Are evaluations on young genotyped animals benefiting from the past generations

    D.A.L. Lourenco;I. Misztal;S. Tsuruta;I. Aguilar

  • Invited review: Advances and applications of random regression models: From quantitative genetics to genomics

    H R Oliveira;L F Brito;D A L Lourenco;F F Silva

  • Hot topic: Use of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) with a large number of genotypes.

    B.O. Fragomeni;D.A.L. Lourenco;Shogo Tsuruta;Yutaka Masuda

  • Implementation of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor for US Holsteins with a large number of genotyped animals.

    Y. Masuda;I. Misztal;S. Tsuruta;A. Legarra

  • Development of genomic predictions for harvest and carcass weight in channel catfish

    Andre L. S. Garcia;Brian Bosworth;Geoffrey Waldbieser;Ignacy Misztal

  • Dimensionality of genomic information and performance of the Algorithm for Proven and Young for different livestock species

    Ivan Pocrnic;Daniela A. L. Lourenco;Yutaka Masuda;Ignacy Misztal

  • Changes in genetic parameters for fitness and growth traits in pigs under genomic selection.

    Jorge Hidalgo;Shogo Tsuruta;Daniela Lourenco;Yutaka Masuda

  • Genome-wide association for milk production traits and somatic cell score in different lactation stages of Ayrshire, Holstein, and Jersey dairy cattle.

    H.R. Oliveira;H.R. Oliveira;J.P. Cant;L.F. Brito;F.L.B. Feitosa

  • A genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism and copy number variation analysis for number of piglets born alive

    Unknown

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their knowledge beyond traditional Animal Science and Veterinary studies, several online degree options offer unique career pathways. For example, professionals looking to support animal caregivers and pet owners might consider an online substance abuse counseling degree, which equips graduates with skills to assist clients facing addiction challenges. Such expertise is valuable when addressing the well-being of families and individuals impacted by pet-related issues.

Similarly, pursuing an mft master's programs online can prepare students to offer mental health support in family and marriage contexts, often including pet therapy or animal-assisted interventions as complementary methods. This degree emphasizes empathy and communication skills that can enhance veterinary care environments and client relationships.

For those aiming for advanced leadership roles or academic careers, earning a doctorate in counseling online provides in-depth knowledge of behavioral science and counseling techniques. Such expertise can lead to improved animal welfare programs or pioneering research in human-animal interactions.

Beyond counseling, exploring careers with animals that pay well highlights diverse options in the animal industry, including veterinary technology, wildlife management, and animal nutrition. These pathways not only offer competitive salaries but also the chance to make a meaningful impact on animal health and conservation.

Recently Published Articles