World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
46
Citations
6430
World Ranking
6947
National Ranking
3037

Cornelia Fermüller publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cornelia Fermüller sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 227 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Cornelia Fermüller D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cornelia Fermüller sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Cornelia Fermüller is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their research spans primarily across the fields of Computer Science and Engineering, with a substantial focus on subfields including Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Aerospace Engineering, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics relevant to advanced computational methods and robotics. These main areas include:

  • Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
  • Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Neural dynamics and brain function

Fermüller has contributed extensively to the scientific literature, with over one hundred publications, frequently appearing in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Frontiers in Robotics and AI, Science Robotics, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, and the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Fermüller include:

  • "Forecasting Action Through Contact Representations From First Person Video," 2021, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
  • "SpikeMS: Deep Spiking Neural Network for Motion Segmentation," 2021, 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)
  • "DiffPoseNet: Direct Differentiable Camera Pose Estimation," 2022, 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
  • "Symbolic Representation and Learning With Hyperdimensional Computing," 2020, Frontiers in Robotics and AI
  • "Robust Nonlinear Control-Based Trajectory Tracking for Quadrotors Under Uncertainty," 2020, IEEE Control Systems Letters

Throughout their career, Fermüller has collaborated with various researchers frequently. Some of the most common co-authors include:

  • Yiannis Aloimonos
  • Nitin J. Sanket
  • Chahat Deep Singh
  • Chethan M. Parameshwara
  • Snehesh Shrestha

Their research contributions focus on advancing computational models and intelligent systems integrating vision, neural computing, and robotics technologies. The work often addresses complex perception and control challenges, including action recognition, motion segmentation, and camera pose estimation, contributing to fields that intersect AI and engineering disciplines.

Best Publications

  • Viewpoint Invariant Texture Description Using Fractal Analysis

    Yong Xu;Hui Ji;Cornelia Fermüller

  • Event-Based Moving Object Detection and Tracking

    Anton Mitrokhin;Cornelia Fermuller;Chethan Parameshwara;Yiannis Aloimonos

  • Affordance detection of tool parts from geometric features

    Austin Myers;Ching L. Teo;Cornelia Fermuller;Yiannis Aloimonos

  • Robot learning manipulation action plans by Watching unconstrained videos from the world wide web

    Yezhou Yang;Yi Li;Cornelia Fermuller;Yiannis Aloimonos

  • Robust Wavelet-Based Super-Resolution Reconstruction: Theory and Algorithm

    Hui Ji;C. Fermuller

  • Motion segmentation using occlusions

    A.S. Ogale;C. Fermuller;Y. Aloimonos

  • The Statistics of Optical Flow

    Cornelia Fermüller;David Shulman;Yiannis Aloimonos

  • Scale-space texture description on SIFT-like textons

    Yong Xu;Sibin Huang;Hui Ji;Cornelia FermüLler

  • Qualitative egomotion

    Cornelia Fermüller;Yiannis Aloimonos

  • Learning sensorimotor control with neuromorphic sensors: Toward hyperdimensional active perception.

    Anton Mitrokhin;Peter Sutor;Cornelia Fermüller;Yiannis Aloimonos

  • A Projective Invariant for Textures

    Yong Xu;Hui Ji;C. Fermuller

  • Direct perception of three-dimensional motion from patterns of visual motion

    Cornelia Fermüller;Yiannis Aloimonos

  • Effects of Errors in the Viewing Geometry on Shape Estimation

    LoongFah Cheong;Cornelia Fermüller;Yiannis Aloimonos

  • Uncertainty in visual processes predicts geometrical optical illusions.

    Cornelia Fermüller;Henrik Malm

  • EV-IMO: Motion Segmentation Dataset and Learning Pipeline for Event Cameras

    Anton Mitrokhin;Chengxi Ye;Cornelia Fermuller;Yiannis Aloimonos

  • GapFlyt: Active Vision Based Minimalist Structure-Less Gap Detection For Quadrotor Flight

    Nitin J. Sanket;Chahat Deep Singh;Kanishka Ganguly;Cornelia Fermuller

  • Grasp type revisited: A modern perspective on a classical feature for vision

    Yezhou Yang;Cornelia Fermuller;Yi Li;Yiannis Aloimonos

  • Observability of 3D Motion

    Cornelia Fermüller;Yiannis Aloimonos

  • A spherical eye from multiple cameras (makes better models of the world)

    P. Baker;C. Fermuller;Y. Aloimonos;R. Pless

  • Image Understanding using vision and reasoning through Scene Description Graph

    Somak Aditya;Yezhou Yang;Chitta Baral;Yiannis Aloimonos

  • The role of fixation in visual motion analysis

    Cornelia Fermüller;Yiannis Aloimonos

  • Real-Time Clustering and Multi-Target Tracking Using Event-Based Sensors

    Francisco Barranco;Cornelia Fermuller;Eduardo Ros

  • Vision and action

    Cornelia Fermüller;Yiannis Aloimonos

  • Wavelet-Based Super-Resolution Reconstruction : Theory and Algorithm

    Hui Ji;Cornelia Fermüller

Frequent Co-Authors

Yiannis Aloimonos
Yiannis Aloimonos University of Maryland, College Park
Hui Ji
Hui Ji National University of Singapore
Robert Pless
Robert Pless George Washington University
Michael Pfeiffer
Michael Pfeiffer Bosch Center for Artificial Intelligence
Chitta Baral
Chitta Baral Arizona State University
Tobi Delbruck
Tobi Delbruck ETH Zurich
Hal Daumé
Hal Daumé University of Maryland, College Park
Jana Kosecka
Jana Kosecka George Mason University
Daniel DeMenthon
Daniel DeMenthon Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Tom Goldstein
Tom Goldstein University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Thinking beyond a traditional Computer Science degree? Online education in the USA now offers many flexible options to suit your goals and timeline. You can accelerate your advancement with the quickest masters degree online programs, which let working professionals enter specialized tech fields—like data science or cybersecurity—even faster.

When selecting a degree, it’s wise to consider masters degrees that are worth it. Highly-valued and in-demand tech master’s programs can lead to strong job prospects, higher salaries, and increased job security.

If you’re just starting out or looking to change careers, explore the benefits of online associate degree programs. These affordable pathways are flexible and offer a practical entry into the computer science field, often counting toward future bachelor’s degrees.

Whichever path you choose, budget is an important factor. Consider the many affordable online degree programs to help you minimize student debt while maximizing career opportunities in a dynamic and growing industry.

Best Scientists Citing Cornelia Fermüller

Trending Scientists