World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
56
Citations
10560
World Ranking
4539
National Ranking
2049

Clyde W. Hodge publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clyde W. Hodge sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 152 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Clyde W. Hodge D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clyde W. Hodge sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Adolescent cortical development : A critical period of vulnerability for addiction

    Fulton Crews;Jun He;Clyde Hodge

  • A novel nociceptor signaling pathway revealed in protein kinase c ε mutant mice

    Sachia G. Khasar;Yu Huei Lin;Annick Martin;Jahan Dadgar

  • Stimulation of Endorphin Neurotransmission in the Nucleus Accumbens by Ethanol, Cocaine, and Amphetamine

    M. F. Olive;H. N. Koenig;M. A. Nannini;C. W. Hodge

  • Supersensitivity to allosteric GABA A receptor modulators and alcohol in mice lacking PKCε

    Clyde W. Hodge;Kristin K. Mehmert;Stephen P. Kelley;Thomas McMahon

  • Elevated extracellular CRF levels in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis during ethanol withdrawal and reduction by subsequent ethanol intake.

    M.Foster Olive;Heather N. Koenig;Michelle A. Nannini;Clyde W. Hodge

  • Increased anxiety and altered responses to anxiolytics in mice deficient in the 65-kDa isoform of glutamic acid decarboxylase

    Shera F. Kash;Laurence H. Tecott;Clyde Hodge;Steinunn Baekkeskov

  • Alcohol self-administration: further examination of the role of dopamine receptors in the nucleus accumbens.

    Clyde W. Hodge;Herman H. Samson;Ann M. Chappelle

  • Effect of dopamine agonists and antagonists on ethanol-reinforced behavior: The involvement of the nucleus accumbens

    Herman H. Samson;Clyde W. Hodge;Gerald A. Tolliver;M. Haraguchi

  • GABAA receptor alpha-1 subunit deletion alters receptor subtype assembly, pharmacological and behavioral responses to benzodiazepines and zolpidem

    J.E. Kralic;T.K. O’Buckley;R.T. Khisti;C.W. Hodge

  • The mGluR5 antagonist MPEP decreases operant ethanol self-administration during maintenance and after repeated alcohol deprivations in alcohol-preferring (P) rats

    Jason P. Schroeder;David H. Overstreet;Clyde W. Hodge

  • Abstinence following Alcohol Drinking Produces Depression-Like Behavior and Reduced Hippocampal Neurogenesis in Mice

    Jennie R Stevenson;Jason P Schroeder;Jason P Schroeder;Kimberly Nixon;Kimberly Nixon;Joyce Besheer

  • Expression Profiling of Neural Cells Reveals Specific Patterns of Ethanol-Responsive Gene Expression

    Christelle Thibault;Christelle Thibault;Chaoqiang Lai;Norbert Wilke;Bao Duong

  • The mGluR5 antagonist MPEP selectively inhibits the onset and maintenance of ethanol self-administration in C57BL/6J mice

    Clyde W. Hodge;Michael F. Miles;Amanda C. Sharko;Rebekah A. Stevenson

  • Alcohol self-administration: role of mesolimbic dopamine.

    Herman H. Samson;Gerald A. Tolliver;Miki Haraguchi;Clyde W. Hodge

  • CRF-1 antagonist and CRF-2 agonist decrease binge-like ethanol drinking in C57BL/6J mice independent of the HPA axis.

    Emily G Lowery;Marina Spanos;Montserrat Navarro;Angela M Lyons

  • Reduced operant ethanol self-administration and in vivo mesolimbic dopamine responses to ethanol in PKCε-deficient mice

    M. F. Olive;K. K. Mehmert;Robert O Messing;C. W. Hodge

  • Decreased anxiety-like behavior, reduced stress hormones, and neurosteroid supersensitivity in mice lacking protein kinase Cε

    Clyde W. Hodge;Jacob Raber;Thomas McMahon;Helen Walter

  • The discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol are mediated by NMDA and GABA(A) receptors in specific limbic brain regions.

    Clyde W. Hodge;Amy A. Cox

  • Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 5 Activity in the Nucleus Accumbens Is Required for the Maintenance of Ethanol Self-Administration in a Rat Genetic Model of High Alcohol Intake

    Joyce Besheer;Julie J.M. Grondin;Reginald Cannady;Amanda C. Sharko

  • Targeted gene deletion of the 5-HT3A receptor subunit produces an anxiolytic phenotype in mice

    Stephen P. Kelley;Alison M. Bratt;Clyde W. Hodge

Frequent Co-Authors

Herman H. Samson
Herman H. Samson Wake Forest University
M. Foster Olive
M. Foster Olive Arizona State University
Robert O. Messing
Robert O. Messing The University of Texas at Austin
David H. Overstreet
David H. Overstreet University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Thomas A. McMahon
Thomas A. McMahon University of Melbourne
A. Leslie Morrow
A. Leslie Morrow University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Benjamin D. Philpot
Benjamin D. Philpot University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
R. Mark Wightman
R. Mark Wightman University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Kimberly Nixon
Kimberly Nixon The University of Texas at Austin
Todd E. Thiele
Todd E. Thiele University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Clyde W. Hodge

Recently Published Articles